this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
850 points (95.2% liked)

me_irl

6322 readers
615 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Nougat@fedia.io 168 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Whether you had fun and the quality of the movie are not entirely related.

Often times I find that highly rated movies aren't fun to watch. They follow the 'good movie' formula and it shows. I really only like comedy and action movies, personally, but don't want every movie to follow the hero's journey. I don't need them all to be the tale of an underdog who really has the greatest power. I don't need the camera framing to hint at who the antagonist is.

I just want to see the girl and her dog defeat Predator or James MacAvoy's beastly terror in Split. If they happen to also include some of the formula, that's okay but it certainly isn't what made the movie good to me.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 days ago (12 children)

Says who? Is the whole point of movies not for you to have fun?

[–] StaticFalconar@lemmy.world 105 points 2 days ago (4 children)

In the same sense the point of food is to get you full. There's more nuance to it.

[–] pimento64@sopuli.xyz 41 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm sick of these elitists telling me it's gross to eat nothing but five cans of refried beans, like, let people enjoy things!

[–] Empricorn 5 points 1 day ago

I mean, nobody wants to admit they ate nine cans of ravioli, but I did. I'm ashamed of myself... The first doesn't count. Then you get to the second, then the third. And the fourth, and the fifth I think I burned with a blowtorch. And then I just kept eating...

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's why I find myself staring at a half eaten jar of green olives or an empty sleeve of crackers during the wee hours. Sometimes we just want to get to the point and not bother with the journey.

[–] OceanSoap@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Great analogy. I'm going to use this next time someone tells me I should just ignore the shitty writing in self published books and have fun reading it.

Fuck you, I paid money for this, I get to bitch about why it sucks.

[–] youCanCallMeDragon@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but if I enjoyed eating the food it was good food.

[–] 9bananas@feddit.org 5 points 1 day ago

junk food is still junk food, even if you enjoyed it.

that was the point of the comparison in the previous comment.

the nutritional quality of food has little to do with your enjoyment of it.

[–] Ioughttamow@fedia.io 35 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Children of Men, good movie, not fun

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

What makes it good to you?

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Also Pig, too autheur for me, not fun, but i still like it.

[–] SARGE@startrek.website 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Evolution (2001) is an objectively bad movie.

It is also one of my all time favorites because it's fun and doesn't take itself too seriously.

Schindler's List is an objectively good movie. It is decidedly not fun.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Yo, I completely forgot about Evolution! Definitely putting that on the rewatch list.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Some movies are intentionally not fun, because their message isn't about fun things.

Leaving Las Vegas isn't fun.

[–] Carnelian@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah movies are ranked on a set of objective criteria such variety and use of color, the use of varied angles, runtime:budget ratio, and so on. Technically speaking the best movies are usually produced by accidentally dropping a cellphone from a hot air balloon

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] tomenzgg@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago

Thank you for this; best thing I've seen all week.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you should read my previous comment again.

One can have fun watching a bad movie. One can have no fun watching a good movie.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (3 children)

One can have no fun watching a good movie

Requiem for a Dream

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I had a lot of fun watching that. I played a drinking game where every time he took a drink, so did I.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 8 points 2 days ago

How are you posting if you're dead?

[–] NecroParagon@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago

Such a perfect example. I had the opposite of fun watching that the first time but it's still one of my favorite movies.

[–] morgunkorn@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

Dancer in the Dark

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Schindler's List is not a fun movie.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Movies are art, the point of art is to elicit emotion. If a movie does that, it's probably a good movie.

[–] vala@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Having fun is always a valid reason to watch a movie. And making a fun movie is a valid pursuit.

Buuuut at the same time movies can be more than just fun and some people really want that.

Expecting a movie to be more than just fun can lead to let downs.

Tl;Dr people take movies too seriously

[–] 0ops@lemm.ee 2 points 2 days ago

Imo if it's fun then it's good, but being fun isn't the only path to "goodness". Lots of good movies out there that are the opposite of fun

No idea why you’re getting downvoted. Did all the lemmings forget how to experience joy? If you like the art, it’s good art. That’s the whole point.

[–] sangriaferret@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Dancer in the Dark