this post was submitted on 15 Jun 2025
59 points (100.0% liked)

askchapo

23040 readers
206 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In terms of theory, I don't consider myself well read. Theory is often really tough for me to read. Even with very easy-to-read writers like Michael Parenti, it's dense with mindblowing info. And things like the book Will to Change by Bell Hooks hits me in really raw feelings so I stopped at the first chapter. I need the easiest authors and their easiest-to-read works, or else I'm just not reading.

-Micahel Parenti: What’s a Slum? Urban Poverty and Marginality in America

-"I Have a Dream, a Blurred Vision" by Michael Parenti"

-Friendly Feudalism: The Tibet Myth

No idea how I got through "Friendly Feudalism." I read these all about 3.5 years ago before I lost the bandwidth to go further.


Edit: I tend to watch things more so I guess you can add video links after everything else too.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 30 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

You may like this Marxist-Leninist intro list I made. Rather than just recommending a bunch of good works, it's formatted to build up on itself over time, so you are more prepared for the later works by reading the earlier ones. Might fix your momentum obstacle!

[–] randomquery@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Politzer's Elementary Principles of Philosophy is the first ever book on philosophy I tried to read as a child: I found it in my parent's bookcase and I was curious to know what philosophy was about. Even though I gave up very quickly, the first distinction it makes between materialist and idealist philosophy had left quite an impression on me. Seeing the title brought back some memories blob-no-thoughts

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Ah, what I would give to have an old, physical copy! Used copies are prohibitively expensive these days. I love the book, it's really such a great intro and really gets you excited about philosophy.

[–] Sam@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I bought a new print from the Foreign Languages Press, it took a while to get here but it was cheap and nicely made and when it comes to out of print theory thats all I can ask for.

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 2 points 3 days ago

Yep, considered giving that a go. Glad to hear it turned out well!

[–] randomquery@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When I visit my parent's place I will look to see if I can find it again and give it a real read this time very-smart

[–] Cowbee@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

Go for it! It's a great intro and really helps contextualize philosophy for other theory. When Marx or Lenin talk about other philosophers, you aren't grasping in the dark like some intros to just Dialectical Materialism can do.