this post was submitted on 04 Jun 2025
194 points (97.1% liked)

politics

23948 readers
2732 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

"Let’s start with the obvious — a tyrant sits in the White House," Walsh added. "The very thing our Founders feared most is here. Throw in the fact that one of our two major political parties is a real and direct threat to democracy and the rule of law. These are unprecedented, dangerous times in America. I know it. You know it. There are even Republicans who know it."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I mean, the Tea Party was largely funded by the Koch brothers to fight to remove taxes on them. Many Libertarian movements only exist for those sorts of reasons.

Koch eventually went Democrats because he wanted open borders because the cheap labour reduces wages for everyone.

So it makes sense that Koch related followers are doing the same.

[–] faltryka@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] baronvonj@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

He died.

His surviving brother still seems pretty Libertarian.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

They didn't, they just supported illegal immigration because it gave them low wage workers that they could exploit in their pollution factories. To some shallow political thinkers, that's the equivalent of a Democratic position, and if you have one Democratic position, even if it is blatantly self-serving, it means you're a Democrat.

[–] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's a bunch of articles about it, he's talked about it. He donated to them, and opened his networks up to their usage/advertising:

https://www.google.com/search?q=Koch+supports+democrats

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Charles Koch says he'd work with Democrats who share his values

Sure, he'll support Democrats as long as they have Republican values.