this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
1084 points (98.0% liked)

News

29346 readers
3388 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Republicans are drunk with power. What a stupid fucking idea. There’s no chance of banning porn. Then they wouldn’t be able to jerk to Trans women and feel shame after.

Trans women are hot, in case that reads as though the shame is correct. It’s not.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 301 points 23 hours ago (5 children)

They don't intend to ban anything. They're just creating reasons to lock people up.

They are, to a man, insane authoritarian shitbags. All they care about is control.

[–] CalipherJones@lemmy.world 211 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

The plan according to project 2025 is to classify trans people existing as pornographic. Wish I was joking. Been warning people about this for a year now.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 100 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Anything related to queer identities could fall under obscenity by whatever arbitrary definitions they want to use.

No more pride or rainbow flags, no support groups for queer youth, no sex education, all of that is obscene.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 44 points 23 hours ago

Basically everything they have to say on the subject is thinley veiled homophobia and should be treated as such

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 31 points 23 hours ago

so just like Russia

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Yup, it’s the typical conservative playbook: If you don’t like something, redefine it as something unpopular. Then target the unpopular thing, so democrats can’t oppose it without inciting “this democrat voted against a bill to protect/stop {sympathetic demographic} from {unpopular thing}” smear campaigns.

Step 1 was equating trans people with sexual predators. You keep that messaging consistent and constant. Find stories of trans people doing normal things, but spin it as if they’re dangerous. Invent stories if you need to, because debunking them takes a lot more time than inventing them…

They weren’t jogging in a neighborhood; they were casing the neighborhood. They weren’t using a public restroom; they were looking for people to sexually assault. They weren’t trying on clothes to see if they fit; they were looking to assault women and children in the changing rooms. They weren’t volunteering for the local women’s shelter; They were looking for defenseless victims. They weren’t writing a book for other trans people; They were indoctrinating kids and trying to turn them trans. Et cetera, et cetera…

Once conservative voters have started to accept that messaging, you move onto step 2:
“This bill will protect children from sexual predators” means it bans trans people from being able to pee.
“This bill will protect children from being exposed to dangerous sexual material” means it bans any kind of trans iconography by labeling it as porn.
“This bill will stop sexual predators from hiding in your neighborhood” means it requires trans people to register in a public database/wear a {pink triangle} badge.
“This bill will ensure sexual predators are kept away from the rest of the population” means it rounds trans people up into camps.

And if anybody ever tries to point out what the bill is really doing, put them on blast with the “radical left is trying to let sexual predators steal your kids and assault your women” messaging.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 4 points 18 hours ago

Sure would be nice if the not-as-conservatives could use their own tactics to flip the script on them.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world -1 points 15 hours ago

I disagree that it's conservative. It's nazi/ authoritarian/radical. For 50 odd years afer ww2 the cons knew this was a daft tactic. Prior to that (well prior to 1790 ish ) con/feudal/landowners managed their serfs and peasants, they didn't want infighting. (outfighting, thats a different , maybe lucrative albeit lottery).

Cons are just common or garden cunts. populists are serious, they can mobilise labour .

The traditional cons wil ride the wave because they have no choice and no friends. until they realise they'll be expropriated eventually, which the nazis won't do until after they have critical mass. Fucking con Niemollers

[–] shiroininja@lemmy.world 26 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

The original documents for project 2025 were released in 2017 well leaked in 2017. And it was talked about for about the day and disappeared and here we are.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 29 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (2 children)

It really made the rounds again in 2020, even to the point of breaking into the mainstream. Probably a lot more people are aware of it than you might think, it's just the doing something about it that we're all sticking on.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

In 2020 we didn’t have to do anything about it. It was just another set of online nutcases, no one who could get elected would actually try that.

2025: hold my beer

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

I meant to say 2024, during the election. The past few years have been a blur to me.

[–] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's well known now.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 7 points 21 hours ago

It's unfortunately not. Go ask your (general) parents or grandparents what it is and what it means. Ask them if they think it's happening right now and to what extent.

I bet their answers will be surprising to a lot of people.

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Project 2025 has been happening in Oklahoma since 2017. No one gave a shit when it was the asshole of the country, but shit spreads.

Y’all get to enjoy the suffering I’ve been enjoying for the past ten years.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 13 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Oh boy, I can't wait to find out if Oklahoma is a shining utopia, a guiding beacon of the future for the rest of the country.

[–] yggstyle@lemmy.world 7 points 18 hours ago

I've got some bad news.

[–] atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works 13 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

The text that became Project 2025 has been published every four years or so since the Regan administration.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 12 points 22 hours ago

That is the pragmatic and short term outcome, but I would not discount the level of power hard-line Christian nationalists have over the far right. Many of them believe "moral degeneracy" like porn is the most grave problem of western society and would be glad to "correct" it given the chance.

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 10 points 22 hours ago

For-profit prison system goes, "Brrrrrrrrrr!!"

[–] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair, Control is a pretty great game

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It is.

We need more media to take advantage of the SCP Foundation. Movies, games, etc. Give the authors credit. Pay them. Because there's a whole lot of great stuff there.

SCP-001 "When Day Breaks" would make an incredible horror movie.

[–] frigidaphelion@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

Oh definitely, 100%

[–] MajinBlayze@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Please don't drag the insane down to this level. This is planned and intentional (even if there is factional opposition)