this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
138 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13823 readers
687 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] lorty@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

But the second one has something different to stop the same problem from occuring? Or is it just the fact that there are two?

[–] Runcible@hexbear.net 17 points 3 days ago

It's just the fact that there are two. Redundancy is an incredibly common (and valuable) approach with safety critical features

[–] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Maybe I'm built different, but I would simply not be prevented from evacuating an emergency situation

[–] LaGG_3@hexbear.net 1 points 2 days ago

smuglord I would simply ~noclip on my way out of the building

[–] Muinteoir_Saoirse@hexbear.net 12 points 3 days ago

Are you being purposefully obtuse? The point being that if there is only one point of exit in an emergency then you are more likely to get into a situation where that exit is blocked. if there are two exits than it is more likely that at least one of the exits is safe to use.