this post was submitted on 11 May 2025

138 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13823 readers

688 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net

MiraculousMM@hexbear.net

Nakoichi@hexbear.net

corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net

PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

sweet_pecan@hexbear.net

a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net

khizuo@hexbear.net

gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net

thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net

context@hexbear.net

Infamousblt@hexbear.net

Sulvy@hexbear.net

138

One of the buzziest ideas in fire safety is letting fire safety officers chop these people into small bits with fire axes. (hexbear.net)

submitted 3 days ago by Posadas@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

https://xcancel.com/rmc031/status/1920440113680572526

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] supplier@hexbear.net 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Honestly. Who tf honestly believes "developers" would take the savings from a single stairwell per building and turn it into more housing? Anyone who's rented an apartment can tell you they'll just line their fat fucking pockets

[–] spectre@hexbear.net 10 points 3 days ago

It's not about cost savings, it has to do with the architecture and floorplanning that can be severely limited by these standards. It's a large enough effect that is worth discussing, but I am not well read enough to outline the whole situation here.