this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
401 points (98.5% liked)

Academia

925 readers
27 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's where you are wrong bucko.

If you let a blue dog lead you off the cliff, it's not the dogs fault: it's yours.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

are you sure you were fully supporting the democrats a year ago?

are you sure?

If you let a blue dog lead you off the cliff, it's not the dogs fault: it's yours

i can see why you're attracted to socialism, it is just an artistic fantasy

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean you just keep trying to project narratives onto what I'm actually saying instead of addressing what I'm actually saying.

If this is how you approach people trying to convince them to vote Democrat, not even having the comprehension to actually listen to them, then it should be obvious to you how you cost the Democrats this election.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

so why did you campaign against the democrats?

did you just want to destroy the US?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

👆

Edit: Here, let me help you understand yourself; the definition of what you are doing:

Psychological Projection:

Projection acts as a psychological safeguard, helping individuals deal with thoughts or feelings that they find difficult to accept. Several underlying reasons explain why people project:

Ego Protection: When faced with uncomfortable emotions or impulses, projection helps shield the ego from perceived threats.

Avoiding Responsibility: Projection enables individuals to sidestep accountability for their actions or feelings by attributing them to others.

Coping with Anxiety: Internal conflicts can be overwhelming. Projection externalizes these conflicts, reducing internal stress.

Reinforcing Worldviews: People often project to validate their beliefs or assumptions about others, even when these assumptions are inaccurate.

Understanding these motivations can provide insight into why projection occurs and how it manifests in daily life.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that describes your inability to confront that you helped trump to victory perfectly

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You damaged the ability of Democrats to win the election by preventing us from moving them to an electable position. You project onto people who were genuinely trying to help Democrats not lose, because they wanted Democrats to move away positions which were unelectable (pro-billionaire, campaigning with Cheney, pro-genocide, etc..), this idea that by asking/ demanding Democrats do better, that they were the ones doing the damage, when in-fact, by attacking them, it was you doing the damage. I know deep inside you, you know this.

In the future, just keep all your political opinions and strategies to yourself, so that we can actually get Democrats to win elections. If you keep demanding that your approach to electoralism be elevated and centered; the strategy of silencing criticisms and carrying water for bad policy; the strategy of marginalizing voices in a big tent party: if you keep demanding this, the Democrats will never win another election again.

Because the fact of the matter is: you are a loser.

As in, your strategy, your approach to electoralism was precisely what was elevated, centered, and focused on by Democratic strategists this election: and its a losing strategy. It lost the election. We've received the wages of your approach: Trump.

So in the future, just stfu and get carried by your political betters.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

i didn't stop you from doing anything unfortunately

i tried to support the democrats because i saw the danger of trump

you just cared about taking away votes from the democrats by blaming them for gaza, and ridiculously calling them a billionaire republican party

because you're a fundamentalist that hates the US and democracy and loves terrorists

as you said, stop projecting and take responsibility

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Look, its obvious you don't understand politics. If you don't keep it to yourself in the future and allow us to move the Democrats to a position they can actually win from, they WILL lose again.

6 million people didn't show up the this election because of the Democrats position on Gaza. They didn't need to be told that voting for a pro-genocide candidate was a bad thing. Its the politicians that needed to move to where the members of their party were. By defending these indefensible positions, you created a permission structure were Democratic politicians believed they didn't have to change their policy.

It wasn't the activist left that convinced people that supporting a genocide is a bad thing. Thats just, a basic morality every person should have. What did you think was going to happen running a pro-genocide candidate in the anti-genocide party? What did you think was going to happen running a pro-billionaire candidate in the anti-billionaire party?

Its physically impossible and completely impractical to "move" the voters of the Democratic party in a single election cycle, let alone an extremely compressed one like we experienced. Not just that, but these policy positions are ones that have been cultivated for literally decades under the Democratic brand. And you expected to do what? Shift the entire philosophical and rhetorical basis of the modern Democratic party in 12 weeks? Through suppression?

Actually take a beat and think about your approach to rhetoric: Its quite literally, epifacial, preposterous.

So I'm sorry that you hurt us. It sucks. It sucks that the damage you've done to this country. We could have won. But we needed to move the candidate. And your answer to that was to demonize anyone trying to save the election from the damage you were doing.

And I know I'm not actually convincing you of anything, but by continuing to respond, you give me the opportunity to convince others the absurdity of your perspective. And it is working. I am shifting the basis and I know it, because I've seen how the tone and narrative has shifted. This is theatrics. Its a performance, and it works.

So thank you for being my partner in this dance. The more you respond, the deeper and more obvious the idiocy is that underpins your approach becomes; the more people are convinced and develop support for my approach.

Please continue; I can do this all day, and you are helping me gather people to my approach to politics.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

that's right you did make a big deal out of gaza didn't you, because you love terrorists and hate democrats

why do you love the terrorists so much, is it their refusal to make peace for 100 years?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Please. Stop. How will I ever convince any one the absurdity of your position with you putting out rhetoric like this? (hard /s)

But seriously, your answer to my point is just racism? Or further: Is it that you actually want the Democrats to become a party of racists? What exactly is it that you are arguing for? Your answer to being against a genocide is to call the people being genocided all terrorists?

Is this it? Have we gotten to your core? Is this why you didn't want the Democrats to stand up against genocide?

Can't you do better? This game isn't (as) fun if you can't do better than simply being racist. Then of course we'll have to get you banned from .world too.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

hey are you doing that projection thing again? naughty

so you wanted to save the terrorists and help them keep the hostages

and you thought the best way to do that was defeat the democrats and help trump get elected

don't you think they would have had more leverage with the democrats than with trump?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm not the one who called all Gazans terrorists; you did and its a deeply racist sentiment. Once I get you to fully document this, I'll of course be reporting you for racism.

so you wanted to save the terrorists and help them keep the hostages

To be clear, you think all Gazans are terrorists? Or that they are all expendable?

I mean, if this was the voter that the Democrats were catering to, its obvious why the lost. Thankfully, the vast majority of Democratic voters aren't racist like this.

I mean if all you wanted to do was support genocide, why didn't you just go be a Republican? We could have stopped Trump if we could have gotten the candidate to oppose genocide. Obviously, as a defender of genocide, that was a deal breaker for you. But you had another pro-genocide option. So you could have still voted your racist, pro-genocide conscious and we still could have beaten Trump.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

wooooooow i think you out-of-body projected there

such evasion, come on would it have been better for the gazans with harris as president?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

such evasion, come on would it have been better for the gazans with harris as president?

Don't pretend to care about the people of Gaza. You literally just called them all terrorists and expendable.

You don't care about the people of Gaza and you never have. You exposed your true self not more than 2 replies back: It was less important for you for the Democrats to win the election, than it was that they keep a pro-genocide stance.,

You are pro-genocide, and if the party would have turned against that, it would have been a problem for you.

So it comes back to the first point which started this all: If Democrats are centering a racist and progenocide voters priorities, they will not win elections.

Thank you for giving us a lens into your thinking. You've even given me considerations I hadn't had before. Previously I assumed this "shut the fuck up and line up behind in support of genocide" approach to politics coming from your camp as based in fear. That you genuinely were afraid of Trump, of losing to Trump, of the consequences of that. I had offered you at least the charity that it wasn't something more nefarious.

But you've done the work for me. For you, it was never about beating Trump. It was always about keeping the Democrats supporting a genocide. When I have to make this point again, I'll be referencing this thread.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

you sure did the work for trump by attacking the democrats, i don't think he's gonna thank you though, and the damage on the US might well be permanent

do you think the US would have been better off with Harris?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Who is it that you think your rhetoric is working on?

Since its become clear that your only point in silencing dissent within the party was to keep the candidates support for a genocide in place, every continuance you offer simply affirms the, now demonstrated to be fact, assumption that you criticisms were always in bad faith.

Have you been banned for this racism before? If I dig into the details of your account, will I find out that this is a consistent pattern of behavior from you?

Edit: Bing bing bing bing! We have a winner:

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i've noticed with fundamentalists that they can't answer direct questions

they live in a myopic fantasy world and can't acknowledge the consequences of their actions

if you do they lash out with baseless accusations

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

if you do they lash out with baseless accusations

Baseless? My poor child, just click back a few threads. Your words are the basis. The things you do are the basis. The part where you equated being Gazan with being a terrorist, in a racist manner: thats the racism.

When you do that thing: its called racism. And it seems, by looking at your account, that you've been banned not only once, but many many times for demonstrating this kind of racism. Here is a link to you being banned for this specific form of racism, well, regularly: https://lemmy.world/modlog?userId=346837

I didn't ban you for racism. I didn't even know you had been banned for being racist against Palestinians until you outed yourself here, by being racist, and I looked further.

But again, I must say thank you. As you continue to behave as you are behaving here, you gather support to me, and diminish support from yourself. I appreciate you doing the work of convincing people to abandon your approach to politics, because it means I have to do far less. If you were able to better disguise your motives, this could actually be challenging. Thankfully, you aren't that subtle.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

what racism?

do you work in a cinema, with this amount of projection...

thanks to you people are too worried about trump and putin to care about whatever extremist cause you're peddling

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Bruh you've been banned no fewer than 8 times for racism.

You interchangeably use the word "Gazan" and "terrorist".

Which is like, terrible. But please, if you want precisely 0 people to ever even consider your stance or politics in good faith, continuing putting yourself on display. Because its working. You'll have driven literally everyone away from your positions with this approach to rhetoric. My role in this is to keep you going, to continue to put yourself on display. Because from my perspective, the more people who understand that by adopting your approaches to politics and strategy, that they are supporting racism; that its not in good faith: the easier it will be to convince them that they need to reject racism and demand better from candidates in the future. I'll be able to win the rhetorical hearts and minds, because it will be impeccably clear that your entire approach to politics is a flimsy veil for your racism.

It will be far easier to convince people to demand more from their candidates when I can show, that those arguing for us to simply "get in line and shut the fuck up" were actually deeply racist and only doing so to ensure that the candidate maintained a pro-genocide stance.

Every reply you offer, it gathers strength to my cause.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

hmm that's not what the logs show

you made the racist inference not me

you're projecting again and throwing accusations because that's your only way of handling tough questions

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Just in case you wise up and start deleting your comments to hide your racism, I want to make sure I screen cap it and post it so it can stay on display in perpetuity:

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

lol, like i said you made the racist inference not me

tell me your thoughts on october 7th

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Are you ready for your ban yet? Or do you have some more racist venom you need to get out first?

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

what are your thoughts on october 7th?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

and like all authoritarian fundamentalists you will oppress any dissenting voices

even if they're not racist

i guess you have no opinion on october 7th, that's an easy one for you to answer no?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Edit:

Looks like you done son. Stay down next time I knock yo' ass out:

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

you stopped responding a long time ago because you can't

in one of the previous conversations i had talked about south africa. that was my favorite conversation i had; was actually in c/Palestine

i think a much more applicable case is northern ireland

do you see that as a path to peace?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

You just a racist trying to keep the Dem's racist. You gave up the game son.