this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
403 points (98.6% liked)

Academia

925 readers
7 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Who is it that you think your rhetoric is working on?

Since its become clear that your only point in silencing dissent within the party was to keep the candidates support for a genocide in place, every continuance you offer simply affirms the, now demonstrated to be fact, assumption that you criticisms were always in bad faith.

Have you been banned for this racism before? If I dig into the details of your account, will I find out that this is a consistent pattern of behavior from you?

Edit: Bing bing bing bing! We have a winner:

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

i've noticed with fundamentalists that they can't answer direct questions

they live in a myopic fantasy world and can't acknowledge the consequences of their actions

if you do they lash out with baseless accusations

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

if you do they lash out with baseless accusations

Baseless? My poor child, just click back a few threads. Your words are the basis. The things you do are the basis. The part where you equated being Gazan with being a terrorist, in a racist manner: thats the racism.

When you do that thing: its called racism. And it seems, by looking at your account, that you've been banned not only once, but many many times for demonstrating this kind of racism. Here is a link to you being banned for this specific form of racism, well, regularly: https://lemmy.world/modlog?userId=346837

I didn't ban you for racism. I didn't even know you had been banned for being racist against Palestinians until you outed yourself here, by being racist, and I looked further.

But again, I must say thank you. As you continue to behave as you are behaving here, you gather support to me, and diminish support from yourself. I appreciate you doing the work of convincing people to abandon your approach to politics, because it means I have to do far less. If you were able to better disguise your motives, this could actually be challenging. Thankfully, you aren't that subtle.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what racism?

do you work in a cinema, with this amount of projection...

thanks to you people are too worried about trump and putin to care about whatever extremist cause you're peddling

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Bruh you've been banned no fewer than 8 times for racism.

You interchangeably use the word "Gazan" and "terrorist".

Which is like, terrible. But please, if you want precisely 0 people to ever even consider your stance or politics in good faith, continuing putting yourself on display. Because its working. You'll have driven literally everyone away from your positions with this approach to rhetoric. My role in this is to keep you going, to continue to put yourself on display. Because from my perspective, the more people who understand that by adopting your approaches to politics and strategy, that they are supporting racism; that its not in good faith: the easier it will be to convince them that they need to reject racism and demand better from candidates in the future. I'll be able to win the rhetorical hearts and minds, because it will be impeccably clear that your entire approach to politics is a flimsy veil for your racism.

It will be far easier to convince people to demand more from their candidates when I can show, that those arguing for us to simply "get in line and shut the fuck up" were actually deeply racist and only doing so to ensure that the candidate maintained a pro-genocide stance.

Every reply you offer, it gathers strength to my cause.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

hmm that's not what the logs show

you made the racist inference not me

you're projecting again and throwing accusations because that's your only way of handling tough questions

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just in case you wise up and start deleting your comments to hide your racism, I want to make sure I screen cap it and post it so it can stay on display in perpetuity:

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

lol, like i said you made the racist inference not me

tell me your thoughts on october 7th

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Are you ready for your ban yet? Or do you have some more racist venom you need to get out first?

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

what are your thoughts on october 7th?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

and like all authoritarian fundamentalists you will oppress any dissenting voices

even if they're not racist

i guess you have no opinion on october 7th, that's an easy one for you to answer no?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Edit:

Looks like you done son. Stay down next time I knock yo' ass out:

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

you stopped responding a long time ago because you can't

in one of the previous conversations i had talked about south africa. that was my favorite conversation i had; was actually in c/Palestine

i think a much more applicable case is northern ireland

do you see that as a path to peace?

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

You just a racist trying to keep the Dem's racist. You gave up the game son.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world -1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

it's what you did 12 months ago that i am pointing out

everybody has a history as you have made clear

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

it’s what you did 12 months ago that i am pointing out

12 ago I was advocating the Democrats campaign in such a way the could win the election.

You were advocating that the Democrats stay racist, so that you could still vote for racism, even if it cost Democrats the election.

It was never about winning for you: It was about keeping the Democrats racist.

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

so you admit don't vote for the democrats same as now, less votes for democrats means a vote for who?

[–] jimmy90@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

no racism you finally remember how you made gaza a race thing

you remeber that wow