this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
403 points (98.6% liked)
Academia
925 readers
7 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
hey are you doing that projection thing again? naughty
so you wanted to save the terrorists and help them keep the hostages
and you thought the best way to do that was defeat the democrats and help trump get elected
don't you think they would have had more leverage with the democrats than with trump?
I'm not the one who called all Gazans terrorists; you did and its a deeply racist sentiment. Once I get you to fully document this, I'll of course be reporting you for racism.
To be clear, you think all Gazans are terrorists? Or that they are all expendable?
I mean, if this was the voter that the Democrats were catering to, its obvious why the lost. Thankfully, the vast majority of Democratic voters aren't racist like this.
I mean if all you wanted to do was support genocide, why didn't you just go be a Republican? We could have stopped Trump if we could have gotten the candidate to oppose genocide. Obviously, as a defender of genocide, that was a deal breaker for you. But you had another pro-genocide option. So you could have still voted your racist, pro-genocide conscious and we still could have beaten Trump.
wooooooow i think you out-of-body projected there
such evasion, come on would it have been better for the gazans with harris as president?
Don't pretend to care about the people of Gaza. You literally just called them all terrorists and expendable.
You don't care about the people of Gaza and you never have. You exposed your true self not more than 2 replies back: It was less important for you for the Democrats to win the election, than it was that they keep a pro-genocide stance.,
You are pro-genocide, and if the party would have turned against that, it would have been a problem for you.
So it comes back to the first point which started this all: If Democrats are centering a racist and progenocide voters priorities, they will not win elections.
Thank you for giving us a lens into your thinking. You've even given me considerations I hadn't had before. Previously I assumed this "shut the fuck up and line up behind in support of genocide" approach to politics coming from your camp as based in fear. That you genuinely were afraid of Trump, of losing to Trump, of the consequences of that. I had offered you at least the charity that it wasn't something more nefarious.
But you've done the work for me. For you, it was never about beating Trump. It was always about keeping the Democrats supporting a genocide. When I have to make this point again, I'll be referencing this thread.
you sure did the work for trump by attacking the democrats, i don't think he's gonna thank you though, and the damage on the US might well be permanent
do you think the US would have been better off with Harris?
Who is it that you think your rhetoric is working on?
Since its become clear that your only point in silencing dissent within the party was to keep the candidates support for a genocide in place, every continuance you offer simply affirms the, now demonstrated to be fact, assumption that you criticisms were always in bad faith.
Have you been banned for this racism before? If I dig into the details of your account, will I find out that this is a consistent pattern of behavior from you?
Edit: Bing bing bing bing! We have a winner:
i've noticed with fundamentalists that they can't answer direct questions
they live in a myopic fantasy world and can't acknowledge the consequences of their actions
if you do they lash out with baseless accusations
Baseless? My poor child, just click back a few threads. Your words are the basis. The things you do are the basis. The part where you equated being Gazan with being a terrorist, in a racist manner: thats the racism.
When you do that thing: its called racism. And it seems, by looking at your account, that you've been banned not only once, but many many times for demonstrating this kind of racism. Here is a link to you being banned for this specific form of racism, well, regularly: https://lemmy.world/modlog?userId=346837
I didn't ban you for racism. I didn't even know you had been banned for being racist against Palestinians until you outed yourself here, by being racist, and I looked further.
But again, I must say thank you. As you continue to behave as you are behaving here, you gather support to me, and diminish support from yourself. I appreciate you doing the work of convincing people to abandon your approach to politics, because it means I have to do far less. If you were able to better disguise your motives, this could actually be challenging. Thankfully, you aren't that subtle.
what racism?
do you work in a cinema, with this amount of projection...
thanks to you people are too worried about trump and putin to care about whatever extremist cause you're peddling
Bruh you've been banned no fewer than 8 times for racism.
You interchangeably use the word "Gazan" and "terrorist".
Which is like, terrible. But please, if you want precisely 0 people to ever even consider your stance or politics in good faith, continuing putting yourself on display. Because its working. You'll have driven literally everyone away from your positions with this approach to rhetoric. My role in this is to keep you going, to continue to put yourself on display. Because from my perspective, the more people who understand that by adopting your approaches to politics and strategy, that they are supporting racism; that its not in good faith: the easier it will be to convince them that they need to reject racism and demand better from candidates in the future. I'll be able to win the rhetorical hearts and minds, because it will be impeccably clear that your entire approach to politics is a flimsy veil for your racism.
It will be far easier to convince people to demand more from their candidates when I can show, that those arguing for us to simply "get in line and shut the fuck up" were actually deeply racist and only doing so to ensure that the candidate maintained a pro-genocide stance.
Every reply you offer, it gathers strength to my cause.
hmm that's not what the logs show
you made the racist inference not me
you're projecting again and throwing accusations because that's your only way of handling tough questions
Just in case you wise up and start deleting your comments to hide your racism, I want to make sure I screen cap it and post it so it can stay on display in perpetuity:
lol, like i said you made the racist inference not me
tell me your thoughts on october 7th
Are you ready for your ban yet? Or do you have some more racist venom you need to get out first?
what are your thoughts on october 7th?
and like all authoritarian fundamentalists you will oppress any dissenting voices
even if they're not racist
i guess you have no opinion on october 7th, that's an easy one for you to answer no?
Edit:
Looks like you done son. Stay down next time I knock yo' ass out:
you stopped responding a long time ago because you can't
in one of the previous conversations i had talked about south africa. that was my favorite conversation i had; was actually in c/Palestine
i think a much more applicable case is northern ireland
do you see that as a path to peace?
You just a racist trying to keep the Dem's racist. You gave up the game son.
it's what you did 12 months ago that i am pointing out
everybody has a history as you have made clear
12 ago I was advocating the Democrats campaign in such a way the could win the election.
You were advocating that the Democrats stay racist, so that you could still vote for racism, even if it cost Democrats the election.
It was never about winning for you: It was about keeping the Democrats racist.
so you admit don't vote for the democrats same as now, less votes for democrats means a vote for who?
no racism you finally remember how you made gaza a race thing
you remeber that wow