this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
792 points (99.4% liked)

politics

21653 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 139 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What could possibly go wrong when you give the most important job in the world to the most unqualified person ever?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

…twice.

We gave it to the most unqualified person ever… twice.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

We need to dispense with this notion that Trump is "unqualified." He is very qualified for the job that he actually set out to do, and has been accomplishing it expertly.

It's just a different job than the one you think it's supposed to be.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Trump is overqualified to take us right into bankruptcy. He's been here so many times! Don't worry! Just ask for money from stupid people that have money!

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Unironically, yes. You wanna know why Trump's businesses kept going bankrupt? Because they were never meant to be sustainable in the first place. They were scams -- probably fronts for Russian money laundering -- and designed to have all the money extracted and then implode on purpose before law enforcement could start looking too closely.

And now he's doing the same thing with the entire goddamn country.

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't believe that for one second. They've got a Project 2025 playbook written by some smarter people that makes them almost look competent. But they aren't even doing that great of a job of it. The whole lot appear to be as dumb as a box of rocks from my PoV.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Consider the possibility that Trump's real goal is to destabilize the US, destroy its democracy and civil liberties, and turn it into a Russian-style oligarchy and vassal state of Russia.

Given that assumption, what mistake has he made that detracts from that goal?

[–] treadful@lemmy.zip -2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a bad assumption. I could just say the same thing with the hypothesis about him being dumb.

It also ignores the fact that he's not alone. He's got pretty much the whole government doing the thing. But I'm sure you'll say they're all looking to do the same thing.

I think his only goal is his own enrichment and power. I doubt he even cares about his legacy.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nonresponsive.

What mistake has he made that detracts from that goal?

I don't think you can name one. Prove me wrong.

[–] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 31 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I bet we could find someone less qualified.

It just would be difficult to find one outside of a hospital or care home.

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 43 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

You joke, but Texas last year had a representative missing for months. Come to find out that she was checked into a care home, still drawing paycheck.

One Source on the matter.

[–] YesButActuallyMaybe@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

I mean.. we can’t blame her for forgetting that she had one job after all now, can we?

[–] ubergeek@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

It just would be difficult to find one outside of a hospital or care home.

Hey now! Elon and Rubio are right there

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Doing nothing would be more qualified than what Trump is doing.

[–] raoulduke85@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago
[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Even they've at least experienced heath care for poor people.