this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
232 points (99.2% liked)

World News

41603 readers
3792 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky says he remains "ready to sign" a US-Ukraine minerals deal despite leaving the White House without an agreement following a contentious meeting with Trump.

Speaking in London after a European leaders' summit, Zelensky emphasized that their fractious meeting only benefited Putin.

Refusing to discuss territorial concessions, he stated the "best security guarantees are a strong Ukrainian army."

Responding to calls from Senator Graham that he resign, Zelensky quipped he is "exchangeable for NATO" membership, saying this would mean he had "fulfilled my mission."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

It's kind of absurd that "western" leaders aren't chomping at the bit for that minerals deal. USA might think they'd get the minerals without putting in the required effort, but Europeans can't hope for that. Maybe we just actually can't deliver what's required for a good-faith deal?

[–] MichaelScotch@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It’s “champing” at the bit. Not chomping

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 6 points 14 hours ago
[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Meh, both are considered correct today. Might as well complain that almost every sentence in American English contains misspellings because it's different from British English.

[–] MichaelScotch@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

No, words mean something. Either use it correctly because you know what it means, or don’t use the saying at all. Use a different phrase.

[–] Docus@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

You’re just being pedantic now. Merriam-Webster among others say chomping is acceptable now. Language changes, keep up or shut up

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So, any thoughts on this Ukraine mineral deal situation? It's interesting that you chose to debate the difference between 'champing' and 'chomping' instead of engaging with the actual topic of the post and my comment.

[–] MichaelScotch@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I’m not choosing to debate anything. I’m just saying it’s champing, not chomping. No debate. I agree with you otherwise

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)