this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
276 points (97.9% liked)

ich_iel

2566 readers
435 users here now

Die offizielle Zweigstelle von ich_iel im Fediversum.

Alle Pfosten müssen den Titel 'ich_iel' haben, der Unterstrich darf durch ein beliebiges Symbol oder Bildschriftzeichen ersetzt werden. Ihr dürft euch frei entfalten!


Matrix


📱 Empfohlene Schlaufon-Applikationen für Lassmich


Befreundete Kommunen:

!wir_iel@feddit.org

!i_itrl@feddit.org

!ich_ial@lemmy.world

!zunftgemeinde@feddit.org


Sonstiges:

Zangendeutsch-Wörterbuch


Regeln:

1. Seid nett zueinander

Diskriminierung anderer Benutzer, Beleidigungen und Provokationen sind verboten.

2. Pfosten müssen den Titel 'ich_iel' oder 'ich iel' haben

Nur Pfosten mit dem Titel 'ich_iel' oder 'ich iel' sind zugelassen. Alle anderen werden automatisch entfernt.

Unterstrich oder Abstand dürfen durch ein beliebiges Textsymbol oder bis zu drei beliebige Emojis ersetzt werden.

3. Keine Hochwähl-Maimais oder (Eigen)werbung

Alle Pfosten, die um Hochwählis bitten oder Werbung beinhalten werden entfernt. Hiermit ist auch Eigenwerbung gemeint, z.b. für andere Gemeinschaften.

4. Keine Bildschirmschüsse von Unterhaltungen

Alle Pfosten, die Bildschirmschüsse von Unterhaltungen, wie beispielsweise aus WasistApplikaton oder Zwietracht zeigen, sind nicht erlaubt. Hierzu zählen auch Unterhaltungen mit KIs.

5. Keine kantigen Beiträge oder Meta-Beiträge

ich_iel ist kein kantiges Maimai-Brett. Meta-Beiträge, insbesondere über gelöschte oder gesperrte Beiträge, sind nicht erlaubt.

6. Keine Überfälle

Wer einen Überfall auf eine andere Gemeinschaft plant, muss diesen zuerst mit den Mods abklären. Brigadieren ist strengstens verboten.

7. Keine Ü40-Maimais

Maimais, die es bereits in die WasistApplikation-Familienplauderei geschafft haben oder von Rüdiger beim letzten Stammtisch herumgezeigt wurden, sind besser auf /c/ichbin40undlustig aufgehoben.

8. ich_iel ist eine humoristische Plattform

Alle Pfosten auf ich_iel müssen humorvoll gestaltet sein. Humor ist subjektiv, aber ein Pfosten muss zumindest einen humoristischen Anspruch haben. Die Atmosphäre auf ich_iel soll humorvoll und locker gehalten werden.

9. Keine Polemik, keine Köderbeiträge, keine Falschmeldungen

Beiträge, die wegen Polemik negativ auffallen, sind nicht gestattet. Desweiteren sind Pfosten nicht gestattet, die primär Empörung, Aufregung, Wut o.Ä. über ein (insbesonders, aber nicht nur) politisches Thema hervorrufen sollen. Die Verbreitung von Falschmeldungen ist bei uns nicht erlaubt.


Bitte beachtet auch die Regeln von Feddit.org

founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 33 points 4 days ago (2 children)

No, that's AfD. Linke are leftists, totally opposite of Putin

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -3 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Other than doing what Putin wants them to do.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)
[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 days ago

no weapons for Ukraine

no Ukraine in NATO

no NATO in general

demilitarisation of Europe

I think Putin wants all if these too

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

You want a citation for Putin not wanting weapons shipped to Ukraine?

For disarming Europe in general?

For them bringing in Russia into a European defense pact (fucking uberlol)

For cutting Turkey out of their defense alliances?

Okay bud, here you go:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/War

🤡

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 11 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Yeah their Außenpolitik sucks, but they aren't paid or controlled Putin freaks, that's the AfD and the BSW.

[–] Acinonyx@lemmy.sdf.org -1 points 4 days ago

they might not be controlled by Putin, but they might as well be. this only means that they're having positions favorable to Putin voluntarily and out of conviction.

whatever their motive might be, in the end it amounts to the same thing that BSW and AfD want as well.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social -1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"They just do everything in terms of foreign policy that Putin wants them to do, but that doesn't mean they do what the foreign dictator Putin wants?"

Do you hear yourself?

[–] PlexSheep@infosec.pub 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No, that's not what I said. I don't agree with their foreign policy, that being not wanting to give weapons to Ukraine or other countries, but their social policy is very progressive. Labeling them the effectively the same as BSW and AfD is just wrong.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I didn't say they were Nazis, though I think you could certainly make some snide comments on their pacifist hand-wringing being functionally indistinguishable from isolationism or, dare I say, nationalism in the end.

I said they were Putin's barking, cowardly lapdogs who even if they won a majority and got what they wanted domestically would just get their shit kicked in as Putin finishes his repeatedly stated irredentist goal of reconquering the Soviet/Imperial territories.

Which includes parts of Germany.

Their foreign policy gives democratic socialism a bad name, period. Socialists that won't fight fascism tooth and claw wherever it tries to spread deserve to fail.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Their policy on arms exports reads like an ambiguously phrased expression of misguided pacifism. They argue for negotiation and diplomacy, which isn't itself a bad idea, but it requires forcing Putin to the negotiation table in the first place.

Given they also condemn Putin's aggression, I don't think they're his friends, just naive when it comes to the reality of dealing with an autocratic imperialist whose legitimacy as ruler is founded in his appearance of strength.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

When an entire group of political creatures act like they don't understand basic human nature, it's because they're manipulating you.

They know. It's their job to know. They keep their jobs by knowing.

Especially when it's "socialists" acting like they don't understand the goals of fascists.

[–] luciferofastora@feddit.org 1 points 3 days ago

I don't think international relations is quite so basic as you make it out to be. I've read expert opinions months back already stating that the current rate of attrition would see Putin forced to negotiate sooner or later, but it's hard to call just when. Maybe his willingness to enter talks now indicates desperation while trying to bluff strength still.

In any case, they've made a case for blocking tankers and increasing economic pressure. They're not just looking to abandon Ukraine, simply advocating for ways that don't involve exporting more weapons, which is why I think it's not a matter of opposing goals, just disagreement on the means.

[–] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

No. Leftists are the most consistent against Putin. All parties have their co-opting agents, but the ratio and overall long term goals is what matters

This shouldn't be needed to be repeated, we're in a leftist social platform after all