Source (Reddit), alternate frontend
this post was submitted on 02 Feb 2025
197 points (96.7% liked)
Fuck AI
2122 readers
362 users here now
"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"
A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
For anyone interested, there are some image poisoning tools out there to protect (glaze as example) your att or even attack (nightshade as examle) ai models directly
AFAIK it's very model specific attacks and won't work against other models. Their tool preserving art the same to human eye is great offering, and there's always rigorous watermarking (esp. with strong contrast) as an universally effective option.
Thank you very much for the additional details^^
Watermarking with strong contrast prevents ai from using the images in training? Since when?
It doesn't selectively prevents learning, instead it hinders overall recognition even to the human eyes to some extent. The examples I know is old, but artists once tried to gauge model's capability of i2i from sketches (there's few instances people took artists' wip and feed it to genAI to "claim the finished piece"). Watermaking, or constant tiling all over the image worked better to worsen genAI's recognition than regular noise/dither type filter.
Then people should actually ask for consent for using other's art as training data
Open source ai's shouldn't be training on art that isn't given to them either, should it? I get lemmy has a hard on for open source. But "open source" doesn't give people free reign to steal other people's work. If the art is freely offered I bet these tools wouldn't be run on them.