this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2024
30 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13934 readers
622 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
sweet_pecan@hexbear.net
a_little_red_rat@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net
context@hexbear.net
Infamousblt@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
30
Discussion: Marxism as a Science. Does it Matter? (hexbear.net)
submitted 10 months ago by Antiwork@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
20 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Read this: I don't want this to turn into a struggle session so please do not engage in such a way.

Does Marxism being "scientific" matter? Or does this need to want to cling to science to prove its legitimacy actually hinder its effect? I've been wrestling with this question for the past day and I still don't have a concrete opinion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] redtea@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Thanks for this write up. It was useful and helped me think through some theoretical problems that I couldn't get my head around.