this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
478 points (96.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

3022 readers
433 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

Yes, airbags are exempt items from the National Firearms Act. Your question genuinely doesn't make sense. What tax do you think applies to airbags? Property tax? Sales tax? No one is suggesting suppressors be "tax-exempt", especially because that term doesn't make any sense in this context.

[–] koper -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

"there is no valid argument [...] for [...] taxing suppressors"

This sounded like you were arguing that they should be tax-exempt.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The problem with your comment, yet again, is "tax-exempt" is a meaningless term in this context. What does that mean, exactly? Exempt from what tax?

[–] koper 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am merely trying to decipher your words. So why don't you just tell us what you mean?

Prior to this bill, the sale of a supressor would incur an additional $200 federal tax on top of whatever state sales tax was owed.

load more comments (2 replies)