this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025
478 points (96.9% liked)

Progressive Politics

3022 readers
433 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] koper -2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

"there is no valid argument [...] for [...] taxing suppressors"

This sounded like you were arguing that they should be tax-exempt.

[–] theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem with your comment, yet again, is "tax-exempt" is a meaningless term in this context. What does that mean, exactly? Exempt from what tax?

[–] koper 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I am merely trying to decipher your words. So why don't you just tell us what you mean?

Prior to this bill, the sale of a supressor would incur an additional $200 federal tax on top of whatever state sales tax was owed.