frezik

joined 2 days ago
[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 46 minutes ago* (last edited 46 minutes ago)

Be the reason they had to put up a sign.

Maybe not in this case, though.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

I take a different line entirely. If you have $100k household income, and that's still not enough cover expenses for a family of four, then something is very wrong. By income distribution, 80% of the population makes $100k or less, and it's completely untenable for them.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

I'm having trouble finding a reference to median US living expenses, but you can cut the above number in half if you like. Multiplying it for a family of four won't necessarily be 4x, but it'll be more than 2x.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Why I change my own oil. Not because I save money--generally don't even before your time is factored in--but because I know how to put on an oil pan bolt without cross threading it.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Those figures won't be that far apart. It will somewhat, because higher incomes will have a bigger house and more luxurious car. However, they're putting more of their money into investments, not cost of living.

And I'll reiterate, that's the average for one person, not a family.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 13 hours ago (5 children)

As of 4th quarter 2024, average cost of living for a single person in the US is $4,948/month. Take that $8,333/month, chop off 20% for taxes, and you're already getting uncomfortably close to that number. For a family of four, I really don't see how those numbers work at all.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 14 hours ago (7 children)

It just needs to be clear and set close to the max fill line. If it's low and/or dark, it wasn't done right.

Alternatively, if you're in a place dedicated to oil changes, you can assume it wasn't done right.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 37 points 14 hours ago

Despite the administration’s crackdown and Johnson's suspicions, it’s not known whether the leak came from a member of Congress.

Given the clowns in charge, it's more likely the leak came from inside the White House.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, setting non-standard ports is sound advice in security circles.

People misunderstand the "no security through obscurity" phrase. If you build security as a chain, where the chain is only as good as the weakest link, then it's bad. But if you build security in layers, like a castle, then it can only help. It's OK for a layer to be weak when there are other layers behind it.

Even better, non-standard ports will make 99% of threats go away. They automate scans that are just looking for anything they can break. If they don't see the open ports, they move on. Won't stop a determined attacker, of course, but that's what other layers are for.

As long as there's real security otherwise (TLS, good passwords, etc), it's fine.

If anyone says "that's a false sense of security", ignore them. They've replaced thinking with a cliche.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 45 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

All by themselves, weather forecasting satellites justify every dollar put into space programs. The lives saved are incalculable. We are squandering that benefit for no reason whatsoever.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 14 hours ago

It's not the conclusions that are important. It's how snazzy the PowerPoint presentation is. If you pay them more, there will even be bar charts.

[–] frezik@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 14 hours ago

One of my favorite exchanges from the 2008 election:

Colbert: tell me about growing up with a silver spoon in your mouth on the south side of Chicago

Michelle Obama: we didn't have silver spoons. We had four spoons.

Colbert: but there were spoons, right?

view more: next ›