That wouldn't be super out of place in India.
Is that counting relatives?
Nah, I'm not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.
If your sample is heavily biased, then the data from it is worthless.
Have they actually honored any ceasefire they've agreed to yet?
I would imagine it's based on social security numbers.
It's supposed to help with littering, not recycling. And I've never once seen a water bottle company advertise an attached lid as some sort of ground breaking benefit for the environment.
It's the difference between people who buy them just to show off, and those who buy them to have fun with them.
Doesn't the computer science industry as well?
Yes, that's the point. Everything this administration does is intended to hurt someone.
I think if it only takes a matter of weeks to go into full psychosis from conversation alone, they're probably already on shaky ground, mentally. Late onset schizophrenia is definitely a thing.
It had been 30 days, so I was in the clear
I've only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn't be arguing with someone who didn't understand the core concepts of the conversation.
The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.