SevenSkalls

joined 1 year ago
[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

"Calls for violence against Jewish people"

They're literally just using people's best guesses about what intifada could mean to stoke fear and panic. It's like when they used the words sharia as a replacement for terrorism for awhile.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 5 points 3 days ago

So that and world news are both just hasbara?

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Haha 😂 well if it doesn't even out after a week or so you could always try something else lol

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

I think I have to save this comment because you've given me a lot to think about as someone in this situation. I really need to learn to commit to the process, though.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 39 points 4 days ago

The average American voter folks lol

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Even if he ends up being another AOC, this has been a great moment just seeing all the libs and chuds crash and burn in a torrent of tears. I love it. Let me enjoy it you doomers lol

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It's like history is a constant process or something, and while things do repeat, it's never quite in the same way because the processes still constantly move forward.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago

Idk what's so badly phrased about it. It's a good question. I myself have been wondering if there's any communists in Iran lately because of current events and what their opinions are.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 29 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Right? Like it's so beyond the most evil thing my imagination could conjure, it seems absurd. This must be what it was like when people discovered the concentration camps.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Ya there are some pretty big clues, like some communist jokes I don't think a chud would even know about it.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I have to be honest, he might now deserve a Nobel Peace Prize more than Obama.

Although now that I think about it, Obama didn't encourage a genocide or ethnic cleansing like Trump has.

[–] SevenSkalls@hexbear.net 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

In addition to what others have said, and maybe help explain the why, I don't think Iran really knows how to stand as alone and self-sufficient as the DPRK yet, which has been ostracized and sanctioned since it's founding.

On the other hand, Iran has always been a power player in the region and heavily involved in international politics. They traded with Russia and the British for a long time, and I think China as well. Then they developed a relationship with the US, who ended up helping establish the Shah, a Western puppet who sold off a bunch of his own country and was terrible in many ways, but did lead to even better Western relationships and a place in the neoliberal world order.

Their current isolation didn't really happen until after the Islamic Revolution, when the US started getting a little tired of the Shah too, and then Bush's axis of evil speech. All the huge sanctions are a relatively recent development, so not sure they've quite learned how to live when you're isolated like the DPRK has. Imo they should be making much better friends with Russia and China than the weak purely economic BRICS agreement.

Their revolution was also more religious, not class-based like a communist one would be, which I'm sure preserved a lot of the contradictions other people are mentioning, like reformist liberals or bourgeois who would love to be back in the Western sphere still having a lot of power, so they make deals like the nuclear treaty, even though any communist would know that even if the US didn't break it with Trump, they would have some other reason to either attack or sanction eventually. That's how imperialism works because that's how capitalism works. It doesn't mean don't make those treaties and diplomacy, but do it to give yourself more time to defend yourself militarily and build self-sufficiency, not with the expectation the West will let you join their club forever.

 

I'm watching the DNC, and it's made me even more aware of the power of liberal bourgeois democracies to let out a little revolutionary energy whenever it gets close to the edge, through concessional policies, like New Deal policies or whatever Kamala might do if she wins, or even the act of voting and campaigning itself. Do they have to go through a fascism phase first, or has there been a liberal bourgeois democracy that has successfully had a socialist revolution? Will it take new theory to figure it out?

38
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by SevenSkalls@hexbear.net to c/podcasts@hexbear.net
 

I'm about halfway done with the last season of the Revolutions podcast and up to date with Blowback. I'm probably going to be looking for another fun history podcast to listen to soon to throw into my rotation with The Dollop, to break up the pop culture, comedy, or news podcasts.

I recently listened to the Kissinger episodes of Behind the Bastards and they seemed pretty informative and funny. Also apparently it's by some old Cracked people, and I'm a fan of all those old Cracked content creators. But the first episode says it's about Stalin, so I'm guessing it's like in the progressive but lib direction? I don't mind, just want peoples thoughts on it before I decide to start or look for something else. How is it for people who have listened to it?

view more: ‹ prev next ›