ReluctantZen

They both claim things, but one side (Froot) has put forward receipts after a long time of being harassed over it and the other one hasn't. This doesn't smell like a 'both sides' case to me.

Regarding the charity thing, indeed, but:

• it was found out that the charity (Mermaids UK) might be doing unethical things
• it was going to be her own money, not charity donations from her viewers

I do think it would've been better if she then picked a different charity, but she was already getting harassed for even donating to a transfocused charity to begin with.

Wasn't the cheating thing likely a lie spread by her abusive ex?

Well then

Well , maybe this https://youtu.be/MwLbGcUMy6g

Thank you. Hatred, while understandable here, is not the answer. It'll only push "defectors" to more extreme corners.

If you want more people to join progressive sides, you can't ostracize them further. Show them that hatred doesn't solve anything. Fighting hatred with hatred is pointless.

It's also a distraction. The rich class wants the people to be divided. Being like "no you can never join our side" will do exactly that.

Niet netjes dat de aanbesteding onderhands gedaan is natuurlijk, maar alsjeblieft: liever geen marktwerking op het spoor.

I enjoyed it, but not more than the original. From what I remember, which is not as much as I thought, it became a bit of a slog for me either midway through or towards the end, which didn't really have a pay off like the first eps of the original did.

Payment processors being puritans again huh?

No, it took time to get Proton to where it is now. If it was released together with the Steam Deck, it just wouldn't have had as much game support. Proton already existing also made the SD that much more trustworthy. Proton's initial release was in 2018

Yes, otherwise the Steam Deck would probably not have as much game support as it did when it came out

Just a note before my comment: my reference is the Netherlands, which is struggling with too much cattle and too little land. I can imagine circumstances being different in Australia.

Methane is a worse greenhous gas than CO2 though (28 times more) and just growing more grass, which gets eaten pretty much immediately again, does not necessarily compensate for it. Tackling methane emissions is also a pretty effective short term improvement for global warming, due to it not being nearly as long in the atmosphere as CO2.

But methane is not the only problem with large amounts of cattle. The shit can actually become problematic in for the soil and water due to ammonia. This is a large problem in The Netherlands right now (and sadly we don't have politicians in power willing to make actual changes here). Biodiversity and water quality are going down significantly and a very big contributor is cattle farming.

And let's also not forget that the grass used is for optimizing growing cattle and producing milk (because the farmers get paid like shit). It's not a grass field full of flowers, herbs and other kinds of plants that are good for insect life. They're more or less green deserts.

Mooie en duidelijke uiteenzetting. Het zal helaas voor menig PVV stemmer niet veel uitmaken verwacht ik