MultigrainCerealista

Yea the Diada that’s today

The un-independence day

I would like to extend my best wishes to all, even the haters and losers, on this special date, September 11th.

BAKE UP WEEDPLE

I’m not supposed to laugh at 9/11 but I’m allowed to hijack a jet in GTA who is the real monster

Jet memes don’t smelt 9/11 dreams

The people who died didn’t deserve to die but America deserved 9/11 does this make sense?

Can we please stop celebrating on this awful day, the diada of Catalonia when they lost their independence and became part of Spain you awful fucks

I think as a broadly applicable rule, the slower this conflict burns the better it is for Russia.

That’s not the same as saying the longer it burns since I think Russia has more interest in a permanent settlement than a continued war, but the slower it burns means cheaper for Russia in terms of western support fading away and Russian advantages in manufacturing of munitions being maximized.

I don’t see any reason for Putin to engage in a risky big arrow push at any stage of this war. He tried it at the beginning and got burned, since then it’s been favorable attrition warfare. Why would this strategy change?

3 favorites 😂

I don’t think what you’re saying is wrong, it’s more that I think it’s too convoluted.

Something like 75% of the worlds oil is in the Caspian basin and this explains most of the past 30 years of US war.

I think Iraq, Georgia, Ukraine, Crimea, Syria, it’s about that oil and the countries in proximity to it.

This stuff about “finance capital vs industrial capital” I dunno, it’s not wrong I just think it’s a bit too abstract high concept.

The wunderwaffe is a moving goal post. It’s always the next weapon that will change everything. The weapon that hasn’t yet been delivered is the secret ingredient that will change everything.

Currently this is the F-16.

The reasoning NAFO types engage in is that western weapons are exceptional and remarkable such that only a small number of them can counter much larger Russian forces.

“Wunderwaffen” is the term for this reasoning.

The more cynical view, our side of things basically, is that the west is only providing enough to keep Ukraine in the fight but not enough to win because the west benefits more from this conflict dragging out than it benefits from any peace settlement.

Ukrainian victory is not plausible without western forces actually deploying, and since the west is not actually willing to bleed for Ukraine, the objective of the west is to prolong this conflict for as long as possible in order to make Russia bleed as much as possible.

The mask slips pretty frequently as US senators or EU presidents boast about how “cheap” this war is because “it’s not US soldiers dying.”

The concept is known as a bleeding sore. The west wants to engage Russia in as expensive a conflict as possible in order to force Russia to expend blood and treasure in Ukraine, with the rationale being this makes Russia weaker in the medium term future.

Secondarily and specifically for the benefit of the USA, it forced europe to cut economic ties with Russia and broke apart the growing links between Germany and Russia which ensures Europe remains firmly under US vassalage. The loss of very cheap energy imports from Russia also dramatically undermines European manufacturing which rather directly benefits US manufacturing since the US is also pushing the EU into a trade war with China.