KhanCipher

joined 4 years ago
[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

At least two members of the Academy leadership went so far as to suggest that the organization should apologize to the FBI for offending it. One opined that he didn’t think Roy, a full member of the Academy, should be allowed to present at all.

Fucking LIB

Like seriously, apologize for what? Hurting the feds feelings? Merely having a guy suggest that the feds may be (they do) jailing innocent people?

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

I guess by 2005 Halo had established its control scheme as the de facto standard for console FPS controls

It did a lot more than that, nearly every single developer was copying halo's homework no matter what kind of game they were developing. Making most games feel disposable, meant to just be experienced once then tossed into the bargain bin. All because Halo:CE sold stupidly well.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 11 points 2 weeks ago

If you really want to get into it the general rule for road travel has always been don't go too far outside of the state borders of the state on your license plates. It doesn't matter what state it is, having "unreasonably" (e.g. generally about 3 states away is about the point it starts) out of state plates has always increased your chances of being shaken down by the cops, mainly because they know you're very likely not going to be able to make the trip to traffic court so you can even attempt to contest your ticket.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, you should watch it.

At least because the antagonist is incredibly competent.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 22 points 3 weeks ago

Besides bad geopolitical takes, it's kinda just on cruise control at this point.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 5 points 3 weeks ago

The other thing here is that the conflict between the federation and the cardassians is generally portrayed as a relatively minor border conflict from the federation's perspective, and a full on war from the cardassian's perspective.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 9 points 3 weeks ago

It's been pretty clear that not a single writer knows what to do with S31 post DS9, though what do you even do with a thing that was created to be a foil to an idealistic to a fault doctor that plays in a heavily james bond coded holodeck program.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

Anytime I think about watching ENT, I usually make it a point to skip straight to season 3 if I do, as so many of ENT's problems imo are concentrated in the first two seasons.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Oh yeah, I completely forgot about that when writing this, that is much worse than the example I cited from TNG. I was mostly writing this because I wanted to rant about Dear Doctor.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The thing that really grinds my gears about it is the reason why Phlox doesn't want to give the Valakians the cure, that the Menk are on the cusp of evolutionary jump that can only be done when the Valakians die out. That's his reason out of any number of reasons he could've given instead, a lot of which being related to the living conditions of both species. The Valakians living in seeming luxury, while the Menk are effectively the underclass of the society. It'd be a reason that'd actually have something resembling defensible, and it'd be heavily stretching the definition of defensible, yet still sitting pretty firmly in morally offensive. As there would be so many much better ways to resolve the conflict here, but none of those resolutions can really be compacted into a 40 min episode.

edit: Actually, Phlox is right, but not for the fucking reason he thinks he is. The reason why the Menk would have that 'jump' Phlox says they'll have is after the Valakians die out then they'd have to start learning how to do all the shit that the Valakians did to upkeep, or in reality relearn all the shit that the Valakians had learned all over again.

 

It's about that time when I actually write down how awful the Prime Directive is generally written in trek (I'm going to call it PD from here on out in this post), but first I should lay down what the PD is, it's reasons for existing, and some of my thoughts on it.

The PD out of universe largely exists because of two things. The writers becoming aware that the lives they live were built upon the suffering of others, in this case more about becoming aware of the horrors of colonialism. The next reason being largely a reaction to the Korean and Vietnam wars, though mostly the latter, in a sense of don't stick your nose in other people's business. This is all looking very reasonable so far, like yes we should rules and guidelines to exploring and interacting with other civilizations. The problem is that the writers more often than not have no clue what the PD actually entails, and use it more as a literary device more often than not.

In TOS the PD is largely used as something for Kirk to brazenly violate to show how much of a man he is, and it always working out in his favor, which further proves how much of a man he is. From TNG onwards the PD starts becoming warped and distorted, the most egregious case (besides like all of VOY) of this was the TNG episode where the Enterprise accidentally does a first contact with pre-warp civilization when responding to a distress signal, finds that the two civilizations are in a supremely fucked up situation (one is abusing the other), and Picard decides that the best course of action was to take his ball and fuck off. This was so bad that Lower Decks lampshaded how fucked it was. Then from there on out, it gets dragged out to have our main characters have debates in the important meeting room on whether or not stopping a natural disaster from wiping out a civilization is "playing god" or not, which the answer almost always ends up becoming "The consequences of preventing their civilization from being wiped out, must be on some level better than just letting them die". Partly because I highly doubt any of us would walk away knowing we could've and had the means to do something, and didn't. Also partly because the audience would likely not forgive the characters for not doing anything as well.

The other part of the PD is the 'don't stick your nose in other people's business', and this regularly violated in trek as well. In TOS there's a episode where the Kirk and company are in a system where two civilizations are having a simulated war with each other, and as part of it the simulated casualties of said sim war have to... it's pretty obvious what they're supposed to do. This goes on until the away team that includes Kirk, Spock, and some others are declared as casualties, so of course Kirk goes fuck this shit, this is all stupid and forces the two civilizations to actually have peace talks about what to do now. And the enterprise leaves with it being said/implied that the federation sent out someone to help them and mediate the talks. Which at the end of it I don't think anyone could knock Kirk for violating the PD in this case.

The flipside of this in TNG is the episode where the enterprise and crew is helping a civilization avert a natural disaster, and it's part of their culture that the inhabitants willingly euthanizing themselves after a certain age. This comes to provide the drama for the episode when one of the key people literally gets to that age, and is expected to do the thing while the crisis is still going. Like the I recall the civilization going out of their way to delete said guys work, and pretend he never existed in the first place if he didn't go through with it, he ends up going through with it and the civilization is saved, and nobody learned a damn thing from this. Great job writers, you made a civilization that's so stupid that they'll shoot themselves in the foot rather than survive, that's all I have to say on that.

Now what about the Klingon Civil War, yeah technically that's like it's whole own list of PD violations. I think K'mpec said it best about that whole thing, in TNG: Reunion he pretty much told Picard to his face "Look I know you've got your federation ideals to hold yourself to, but both of us know the federation is absolutely interested, regardless of the ideals they espouse, in the matter of who becomes the next Chancellor of the high council. Not for diplomatic reasons, but to not have a potential war with the Klingon Empire, and that's why I picked you to be the arbiter for picking the next Chancellor."

Now for ENT: Dear Doctor, fuck this episode, fuck Phlox for condemning a Valakians to extinction for the crime of allegedly keeping the Menk in 'evolution hell' (serious, that's the fucking reason), and fuck the writers for making this piece of fucking garbage the PD origin episode.

Alright, is the living situation between the Valakians and the Menk good. Fuck no, absolutely not, that much I know we can all agree on. The premise of the episode is that the Valakians have a genetic problem that is making them evolve into extinction. I'm sorry, but what? What the fuck is this shit, I'm pretty fucking sure it doesn't quite work like that. So questionable science aside, the Valakians have a problem, then throughout the episode Phlox finds a cure for it, and decides that it would be unethical to give the cure to the Valakians. Because he believes that the Menk are on the cusp of a evolutionary jump, a jump that can only done if the Valakians die out. Then due to exec meddling, he manipulates (he doesn't, but like fuck this episode) Archer into not giving the cure to the Valakians, originally it was supposed to be Phlox keeping the knowledge of the cure to himself. Then the NX-01 leaves, and we're supposed to cheer on the doc and Archer for being enlightened...

Where the hell do we even start with this episode, like legitimately where? Like we're mirroring the 'Picard takes his ball and fucks off' episode in TNG, except significantly worse because of the entire implied extinction of the Valakians, not to mention the strange leaps of logic, and the science that sounds very suspect. All that makes for episode that is not only bad to me, it's just flat out offensive on the moral plane.

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

It's good, only because it gives me time to reconsider watching ENT.

Yes in my opinion, having the worst prime directive episode out of any trek series damns it that much for me. Not to mention the other dumb shit, like why did we need a "red alert" origin episode?

[–] KhanCipher@hexbear.net 29 points 1 month ago

any Winnie the Pooh joke

You know, I almost have to wonder if anyone who makes those jokes has even watched like any of Winnie the Pooh, like at all. Like every single story has always been some problem comes to the Hundred Acre Wood and then Pooh and his friends come together despite their differences in strengths, flaws, and personalities to solve and fix the problem.

 

To preface this, I already know the abridged version of what all happens in the story, and I also know what the internet thinks of Ava. So I wanted to play it for myself and see if I can find these so called unforgivable sins the character does. I'm up to Eden-9 (rescue Jakobs planet, right after Maya gets merced), and I haven't really seen anything Ava does as offensively bad yet, and I feel everyone hasn't done anything out of character.

So essentially from what I've played so far, she hasn't really done anything deserving of hate yet.

 

Imagine using this energy for actually productive change, over being angry that you're being slightly inconvenienced.

Pretty much what happened is it wasn't advertised that you would need an epic games account to play the multiplayer, and people are angry about it for some reason. Likely because it's Epic, not because they had to make an account, though knowing Gamers they probably would be pissed about about having to make an account outside of steam too.

And it's funny because the one discord server I usually hang out on that has pretty chuddy people on it largely had a reaction of "Sure it sucks, but there's a lot bigger fish to fry in the games industry."

 

Like I grew up essentially being a homeschooled church kid (who was also abused too) living in a rural rural area, not like a suburb like actual countryside. The homeschooled part is kinda just more that my parents sorta given up on trying after 6th grade. The church kid part was mostly enforced by my parents to try to have a social outlet for me. But at the end of it I just don't know how to talk to people, which has its own set of negative consequences.

It gets worse when any resemblance of community around here is steeped heavily in religion of the evangelical variety. So even if I wanted to I couldn't do anything without being told some nonsense about how everything wrong with me is that I'm a 'lost sheep' that needs to reconnect with god. Including going to get therapy, because I've heard that some of the professionals here is on that BS too.

And the more I'm thinking about it, the more I feel like I'm completely screwed out of having a relatively normal life. Not to mention I found a way to unintentionally self sabotage the first relationship I had.

And this just turned into me rambling about my situation.

view more: next ›