JackGreenEarth

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

At the BT Group (Bisexual and Trans Group)

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The vast majority of people think they should have the right to control others lives. Don't think people should be allowed to kill others? Trying to control others lives. Don't think people should be allowed to get gender affirming care? Trying to control others people's lives.

As for censorship of dissenting opinions, that is a real problem here on Lemmy, many people do seem to think that it's one rule for them when they censor opinions they disagree with, but when others censor their opinions, it's another rule entirely. How about just no censorship, people?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

The vast majority of people think they should have the right to control others lives. Don't think people should be allowed to kill others? Trying to control others lives. Don't think people should be allowed to get gender affirming care? Trying to control others people's lives.

As for censorship of dissenting opinions, that is a real problem here on Lemmy, many people do seem to think that it's one rule for them when they censor opinions they disagree with, but when others censor their opinions, it's another rule entirely. How about just no censorship, people?

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

No, but there's not shame in not being bi. Everyone is different and diverse in their own way, and that's beautiful. You should be true to who you are.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Wtf is this? Ukraine didn't invade Russia, it was quite clearly the other way around.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 6 points 6 hours ago

Sounds like a combination of homophobia/gay erasure and misogyny (I know what women want, not them) to me

 

If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
And you're over the age of majority in your country
If you identify as a man
Or you're over the age or adulthood in your religion
If you identify as a man
Or you're over the age of puberty
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
If you identify as a man
Then you’ll be a Man, my son!

Original - If by Rudyard KiplingIf you can keep your head when all about you
Are losing theirs and blaming it on you,
If you can trust yourself when all men doubt you, But make allowance for their doubting too;
If you can wait and not be tired by waiting, Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies, Or being hated, don’t give way to hating, And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:

If you can dream—and not make dreams your master;
If you can think—and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Triumph and Disaster And treat those two impostors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spoken Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools, Or watch the things you gave your life to, broken, And stoop and build ’em up with worn-out tools:

If you can make one heap of all your winnings And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss, And lose, and start again at your beginnings And never breathe a word about your loss; If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is nothing in you Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!’

If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with Kings—nor lose the common touch, If neither foes nor loving friends can hurt you, If all men count with you, but none too much; If you can fill the unforgiving minute With sixty seconds’ worth of distance run,
Yours is the Earth and everything that’s in it,
And—which is more—you’ll be a Man, my son!

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 15 hours ago

I want my government to provide enough for everyone, not that I would have to work hard and be lucky just so a few people in my family could have better lives.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Yes, I know they exist, I'm saying Firefox should adopt a better one by default.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I don't mean the colours, I mean the userChrome.css themes that actually change the css to make it look palatable.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee -5 points 2 days ago (5 children)

Firefox needs a better default UI theme. There are so many custom userChrome.css themes out there, they just need to adopt a good one as default - eg the GNOME styled theme.

New users get scared off that it looks old, even if the functionality is good, and even if they learnt the complex process to change the theme, it's both not straightforward, and there's no way they would even really know it's an option.

[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Yes, but only alternatives such as the Fediverse. Facebook owned social media is no better, and Bluesky has no guarantee it can't become just as bad in time.

 

As I was donning underwear
I saw a girl who wasn't there
She wasn't there again today
I wish that man would go away!

Original - Antigonish by William Hughes MearnsAs I was walking up the stair
I met a man who wasn't there
He wasn't there again today
Oh how I wish he'd go away!

(This is just one version, there are several variations on the theme)

 

::: How I got this (game spoilers for The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt) Finished the whole story except for the last quest where I enter the inn in White Orchard, and returned back to Skellige where the Nilfgaardian ships were parked. The ships were gone, but their lanterns remained. Finishing the game properly removed them. :::

 

Prompta purple swimming pool filled with purple water, stardew valley

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/52051083

 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/52051083

 
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/46352654

I love the game civ6, that's why the problems with it make me troubled and I want to suggest improvements. I've played through multiple playthroughs and here are some issues that stand out to me.

TLDR: Civ6's gameplay forces you to play in a very imperialist, chauvinistic, racist, and religious way to win.

Problsms

'Barbarians' (indigenous or native people, obviously stereotyped as always warlike), the tech tree that forces you to discover things in the way the Europeans discovered them, not just making you unlock actually necessary technologies before you unlock new ones, even more so with the civic tree as any policy or government can be developed in isolation, it doesn't need the preceding civ6 ones, also you can't have a democracy from the beginning if you want what's best for your people. You have to conquer other continents displacing or killing the natives, and the way it frames certain governments such as communism is disingenuous when they're really describing authoritarianism, and making that misunderstanding more widespread.

My suggested solutions/improvements

Abolish the civic tree. Let you establish any government or any policy ( you can still have policy slots but it's the same across all governments) at any time without culture cost. Governments could affect things like the happiness and productivity of your people, but not more than that. Rename 'barbarians' to natives or indigenous people and create more peaceful options for interacting with them, don't make them aggressive by default. Encourage cooperation with civilisations on other continents (such as lasting trade agreements that you don't have to renew every 30 turns) rather than encouraging settling everywhere on the map. Allow individual cities to get upgrades that allows producing multiple things at once rather than the only way to do so being creating multiple cities. Allow agnosticism or atheism as a 'religion' option and rename religion to 'philosophy' or 'ideology' or something like that. Having real historical cultures and leaders on a generated world doesn't really make sense so there should be fictional or generated civilisations and leaders as options too.

I don't mind if they keep the victory conditions they've got, scientific, religious (although ideological is a better term), military, although not cultural. If people want to play as murderous colonial maniacs they should be allowed to, they just shouldn't be forced into it and should have more peaceful options to play. The scientific victory should be collaborative, with multiple civilisations working together to advance scientific knowledge and improve human conditions (although the current goal of space travel is overly simplistic). Convincing the world of your ideology isn't a bad measure for success either, and conquering the world military is a kind of success, if not a very moral one. Culture victory is just a thinly veiled way of saying that only European culture is good and the way of proving your culture is best is attracting tourists, which is again overly simplistic.

view more: next ›