Emanuel

joined 2 years ago
[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 9 points 3 weeks ago

Please change the "No" vote count to 1.5

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 3 weeks ago

I finally got a decent megaminx. I used to dislike the event, thinking of it as "big 3x3", but I'm enjoying solving it more the I'd imagined.

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 2 points 3 weeks ago

This is crazy to me. Mine would never care enough to learn to solve even a 2x2.

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 43 points 3 weeks ago

They really do apply different rules to AES. China is expected to reinvent mathematics to prove 1 + 1 = 2 or else it is stealing Western research

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 68 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Supporting Palestine: Nazi, antisemitic

Doing a Nazi salute: erm, not a Nazi

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Alternatively, United Union

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 month ago

Thanks for posting this, this is great.

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 19 points 1 month ago

It's ok, I'll be proud for you

(It's actually a very good joke)

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 6 points 1 month ago

lol I ended up posting the abridged version of your comment. Thanks for reminding that other people exist that were excited about the announcement for Pathologic 3 and that are willing to wait another half decade to understand wtf the Changeling is all about

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 8 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It very much is. In summary, the original Pathologic had three characters you could play as. Pathologic 2 initially released as a sort of remake, with only one of the characters from the original playable, with the promise that the other two would be released posteriorly as DLC.

However, it has taken some years now (Pathologic 2 released in 2019) and the second route / character has only just been announced to be planned to be released in 2025. As I understand it, in order not to stunt their sales, what was originally planned to be DLC will be released as a new game (Pathologic 3), and I expect the final character / route will be released as Pathologic 4 or something of the sort.

While the original had 3 characters and 2 only has one, I do think that the world, characters and gameplay are much better realized in 2. The world is bigger, denser, more believable and weirder than it was in the first game. Which is why I believe that it's not necessary to wait for all three routes to come out in order to enjoy Pathologic 2. As it stands, even if the developers go bankrupt and no more games come out, I still think Pathologic 2 is one of the best games ever made and certainly one of the best stories ever told, regardless of medium. It is very much worth the purchase (or torrent, if you want to try it out) and does not require that you played the first game to understand and enjoy it.

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 10 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I just finished replaying Pathologic 2 and it once again reminded me that it is one of the best games ever made. It has a very different vibe from Inscryption and Outer Wilds, but I'd say they're all games that make me believe that games can be art, and, further, can do so by using game mechanics and other aspects unique to the genre to achieve that, other than "only" narrative devices.

[–] Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This page on jperm.net has videos in order of complexity, which, by itself, is a nice resource to use in a traditional CFOP progression. However, I like to use a PDF made by the same guy in the page, which I'll link here because for some reason he doesn't bother to make it more clickable or explicit on the page.

The way I use this document is by looking for alternate solutions if I find that my intuitive solution is not very effective (more than 8 moves per pair, more than one rotation per pair or one rotation in the middle of the solution for that pair).

Edit: I should note that I've discovered a number of what people call "F2L tricks" and algorithms that are not listed on the PDF. However, I see this document as a great resource and starting point.

 

I'm not one to post often. I'm not really one to rant to strangers online often, even. But, after migrating from r*ddit to lemmy, I've had this on my mind and this seemed like the place to vent.

I see discourse about tankies constantly on Lemmy. This struck me as odd. Why are these so called tankies such a threat? Why do I see people calling themselves left-wing and attacking tankies more voraciously than neoliberals and, sometimes, even fascists?

I think I know the answer, just as well as most people who will read this. These are the Zizeks of the world: people who do indeed think in a left-wing oriented way, but fail to recognise that they're also Western to the core and the biases that come with that.

I sincerely care about this much less than the actual reason I'm making this post. That is: why don't these people notice that their talking points, left-oriented as they may seem, always end up supporting US allies or attacking US enemies? I mean, do these people not see that Ukraine winning the war is a boon to the US, regardless of who is "right" in that conflict? Many other such cases, but I think I've made my point, or, rather, my confusion, clear.

That's it. That's the post.

 

Tentei fazer upload de uma imagem através de vários frontends (Thunder no Android, Photon e frontend default no browsee) de uma imagem nos comentários. Ela não ultrapassa o limite de 640kB. Existe alguma restrição nesse servidor de upload em comentário? Imaginei que talvez houvesse para barrar spam

9
First MagLev cube? (lemmy.eco.br)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Emanuel@lemmy.eco.br to c/cubers@lemmy.world
 

I was wondering earlier today what were the first cubes to achieve some milestones, such as the Guhong with torpedoes and such. After a quick search, it appears to me that the first cube to implement MagLev as the default was the MoYu Weilong WR M 2021, but I couldn't find any authoritative source on that, so I'm just left wondering.

Is anyone aware of any earlier cubes that implemented this technology?

Also, what is your earliest bought speedcube? It's pretty crazy to compare my Zhanchi to a WRM V9 in 2024, especially with remembering how stickered cubes were the norm back then.

 

So, I've been to my first comp (yay) and one of the events was one-handed. Now, I don't really practice the event that much, so I just kind of winged it and was happy to get a best time of 34 seconds.

I think this has got me invested in the event, so, rather than using the same cube for both regular 3x3 and OH, I'd rather have a looser, smaller cube for that. What are some of the best recommendations for a small 3x3 (like between 50mm and 54mm) in the current year?

 

Peço perdão ao time de moderação se não for o local adequado para perguntar isso. Também já adianto que não sou da computação, então posso estar me preocupando com um problema inexistente.

Conforme eu uso mais o Lemmy e vejo as comunidades que sigo crescerem, fico pensando em quão eficiente é o uso de recursos das instâncias individuais. Com isso, quero dizer: pelo que entendo, quando eu, usuário do lemmy.eco.br, me inscrevo em determinada comunidade em outra instância, uma cópia é criada no servidor de que meu usuário é nativo. Os posts, comentários e, mais importantemente, arquivos e imagens associados são clonados também, pelo que entendi.

Li em algum lugar que são 20 (ou um número qualquer, mas não todos) os posts copiados quando algum usuário se inscreve numa comunidade "nova" para a instância de que ele é nativo (significando: ele é o primeiro usuário da instância que se inscreve naquela determinada comunidade que está baseada em outra instância), o que deve ajudar um pouco, mas talvez isso nem seja o caso, já que foi só algo que li por aí.

Sei que a instância só vai fazendo cópias conforme os usuários se inscrevem por aí, então não existe uma cópia de todo "lemmyverso" em todas as instâncias, ao que entendo. Isso também exclui instâncias desfederadas, imagino.

Ainda assim, imagino que o uso dos recursos aumenta bastante conforme mais usuários participam, especialmente os chamados power users, que se inscrevem em múltiplas comunidades e obrigam a instância de origem a fazerem cópias de diversas comunidades.

Outra questão que pensei diz respeito a usuários inativos. Se alguém cria uma conta, se inscreve em determinada comunidade em que nenhum usuário da instância tenha se inscrevido antes e deixa de acessar a conta, esse usuário está criando um gasto à instância desnecessariamente.

Tendo em mente essas considerações e que eu talvez nem saiba do que estou falando, gostaria de saber o parecer de vocês, especialmente a administração da instância, sobre o que eu falo. Estou falando groselha? Entendi errado como funciona o Lemmy? E, se não, é sustentável um servidor que funcione nessa lógica a longo prazo? Existe algum "prazo" para deletar conteúdo antigo, para ajudar com armazenamento?

Agradeço desde logo a paciência com meu desconhecimento.

view more: next ›