ComradeVark

joined 3 years ago
[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Perhaps my wording is not quite right in my post: I'm not arguing that all BD releases include special features, but that it isn't a fault of the format. BDs absolutely have other perks. Most BDs, even TV shows, have the DVD special features copied over. If the BD release doesn't have them, then yes, imo it's probably not worth it.

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This has been done to streaming versions, but thankfully it's generally not possible with discs. The blu-rays you buy are pressed, not burned. They are read-only. Changes are only possible with re-releases, and this has happened. For example, the Criterion edition of Miller's Crossing is a different cut from what you would have seen in the theater, though they don't make that very clear.

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'm not sure what you mean about producing blu-ray discs - do you mean pressing the same kinds of discs movies come on? Sony isn't the only one, there are many, though the number is constantly shrinking. Blu-ray IS digital storage. It's easy to back up discs to hard disks. Going the other way, anyone can burn a BD-R, but of course that isn't quite the same as replication. But I don't think it really matters. In most cases keeping copies on hard disks and doing digital distribution is the better solution.

Encoding has improved massively, but just because it's possible to compress a movie to shit so that it's a 3GB file doesn't mean you should. Film is an art form, after all. Maybe a film is better on VHS, maybe it's better in 80GB 4K so you can still see the film grain - either way the presentation quality matters.

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)

You're right. It could be much better, but I also think you've got some confusion/lack of information on some of these issues. If for nothing else than to alleviate some of your suffering, let me explain.

  • ads: these are exceptions, not the rule. most discs do not have ads, fortunately. I'm curious what Blu-Ray you've seen ads on (Disney again?) - I don't think I've ever encountered a BD with ads.
  • players: Improvements in disc technology meant improvements to the players were also needed. Not much that could have been done there. Blu-Ray players are backwards compatible with DVD. Any thrift shop in a moderately sized city is going to have a whole shelf of players. There's no reason not to buy a BD player over DVD at the prices they go for. 4K players are a little more difficult, but once in a while refurb/used models can be had for good prices. It should last - it's unlikely we're going to see another new physical format. It's surprising that we even got triple-layer BD-100 discs for 4K.
  • region-locking: Yeah this sucks, but it can be bypassed. It's possible to buy region-free DVD/BD/4K players. Some labels have region-free discs, but they are an exception. ALL 4K DISCS should be region-free, it's one of the licensing requirements.
  • special features: You're wrong. Blu-Rays have lots of special features. If the DVD had them, the Blu-Ray version certainly does. Most of the ones that don't are not worth caring for. Streaming services sometimes have behind-the-scenes documentaries, but not the same extras discs have.

Torrenting is a great way to go, but as you seem to know, the physical copies are where most digital copies come from. Physical copies are better source material than anything streaming, and BD are better sources than almost any other (sometimes color timing or other nit-picky things can be better on DVD/VHS/LaserDisc editions). BD has support for higher video resolutions, lossless audio, more subtitle formats, more and multiple aspect ratios, and other smaller features. Some of these might not matter to you, some should. If you've only seen a pan&scan copy of your favorite movie and not the original aspect ratio, you're missing out.

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I’ve tried a few different scripts and manual installation, and imo the best solution for modding is to use mo2 through steamtinkerlaunch

 

One of the site taglines of lemmy-based link aggregator "hexbear.net" is "Running on Java Minecraft v0.9." This tagline caught my attention more than the endless number of other annoying taglines, because it doesn't make any sense.

It might seem absurd that a website could run on Minecraft at all. However, several popular mods such Dynmap,^1^ BlueMap,^2^ and JourneyMap^3^ can spin up http servers to show live maps of a Minecraft world. The most obvious problem, then, is the version number.

No version of Minecraft, Java-based or otherwise, has a version "v0.9." The "old" version of the Minecraft launcher has a version 0.9, and it is written in java.^4^ However, it is a launcher, it is not Minecraft! While it is theoretically possible a web server could have been integrated into the launcher, it does not have one.

Minecraft: Pocket Edition has a version "v0.9.0 alpha,"^5^ but this also has obvious problems. It does not follow the same versioning scheme as the tagline, nor could this version run a website. So, we must return to the father of them all, the original java-based Minecraft.

Starting with Minecraft Alpha all versions start at 1.0. Digging through the pre-alpha versions, the only similar version is Classic 0.0.9a. Again, the versioning scheme differs. This was also a "private test build" that is currently lost. It would be a disgrace if the admins of hexbear.net were hoarding this important piece of the game's history. At the end of the "multiplayer test" phase of Classic, a change of the versioning scheme was planned that would match that of the tagline.^6^ This started with 0.24_SURVIVAL_TEST,^7^ missing the tagline by a whopping 15 versions. Not even close.

So, we have seen that the version number doesn't make sense. However, the edition of Minecraft doesn't make sense either! When there was only one edition, the java-based version of Minecraft was known simply as Minecraft (although there were other working titles, such as cave game and Minecraft: Order of the Stone^8^). With the debut of Pocket Edition, which would become Bedrock Edition, the original was often referred to as Minecraft Java (not "Java Minecraft"). As more editions were added and unified as Bedrock, the original game was official dubbed Minecraft: Java Edition (sometimes Minecraft (Java Edition)) with version 1.12.2.^9^

The tagline is an outright lie. Wrong version, wrong edition. All we have left is "Running on," which is incidentally what this post is doing. Please, do your own research before believing any tagline on "hexbear.net."

  1. https://modrinth.com/plugin/dynmap
  2. https://modrinth.com/plugin/bluemap
  3. https://modrinth.com/mod/journeymap
  4. https://minecraft.wiki/w/Launcher_version_history
  5. https://minecraft.wiki/w/Pocket_Edition_v0.9.0_alpha
  6. https://minecraft.wiki/w/Java_Edition_Classic_0.0.23a_01
  7. https://minecraft.wiki/w/Java_Edition_Classic_0.24_SURVIVAL_TEST
  8. https://minecraft.wiki/w/Java_Edition_pre-Classic
  9. https://minecraft.wiki/w/Java_Edition_version_history
[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

It's possible you could find and buy the same one. Don't they export a lot of clothing through China? I suppose it could imported, in which case it's still possible.

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

They make great zomboid mods but mostly I just have fun whispering "filibuster rhymes" to myself in various silly voices

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I knew that I had seen one of these before, but I couldn't find it! Decided just to whip up my own. This one is obviously way more detailed than I could do with 10 minutes of The GIMP.

 

any day now

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 10 points 11 months ago

Will it run doom? We don't care. Will it run hexbear?

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 26 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As others have said, you're not the first to feel this way. I logged on yesterday for the first time in several months after thinking the same and I was pleasantly surprised at the level of activity. I've had mixed feelings about federation but feel like it paid off, though I mostly keep my feed to 'local'. Hell, 2024 might even be the year I finally make a post.

[–] ComradeVark@hexbear.net 6 points 2 years ago

i am about to gain 27 pounds

view more: next ›