this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2023
307 points (99.4% liked)

politics

24228 readers
3005 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Maine’s secretary of state said she has received threats in the wake of her decision to remove former President Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment on Friday.

“I was prepared for the possibility of threats, and I really appreciate law enforcement and the people around me who have been incredibly supportive of my safety and security,” Shenna Bellows (D) said during a Friday appearance on CNN. “My safety and security is important, so is the safety and security of everyone who works with me and we have received threatening communications.”

“Those are unacceptable,” Bellows continued.

top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 67 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We should always expect violence from conservatives. Always. Any amount of resistance to conservative oppression will be met with violence and threats. This has been true throughout history.

Conservatism cannot be cured by pacifism. Expect violence and threats. Never let conservative violence stop you from doing the right thing.

[–] mercano@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Using violence, or the threat of violence, to affect the course of politics, that’s the definition of terrorisim, is it not?

[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 8 points 1 year ago

Not if you're a Republican, then it's "free speech" and "exercising your rights."

The only true terrorism is calling christofascist terrorism bad.

[–] macaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“We are witnessing, in real-time, the attempted theft of an election and the disenfranchisement of the American voter,” Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said. “Make no mistake, these partisan election interference efforts are a hostile assault on American democracy.”

Living up to the GOP (Gaslight Obstruction Projection) standards!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They are masters of DARVO. Everyone from those in the very elitist echelons of their party, to the fascist bullhorns that they call "news", right on down to the dumbest members of the base, who are at least capable of mumbling the DARVO talking points they are given to parrot.

[–] tpyo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Because sometimes I need a refresher on terms:

deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender

[–] omgarm 4 points 1 year ago

What's DARVO?

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Here's a thought, how about we flood her office with thanks? I mean if there are 10,000 thank you letters and 10 stupid, incriminating threat letters, wouldn't that be better?

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Likely unwise. I want the 10 illegals to get charged, not have the chances of overloading mail rooms and ability to adequately sift through it all be bogged down. 10,010 letters saying mostly great things make for an easier situation to miss the 1 who acts on the threat.

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course she did. The conservatives are throwing their hissy fit as per usual when they don’t get their way- which happens to be corruption to their benefit.

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 9 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Maine’s secretary of state said she has received threats in the wake of her decision to remove former President Trump from the ballot under the 14th Amendment on Friday.

“I was prepared for the possibility of threats, and I really appreciate law enforcement and the people around me who have been incredibly supportive of my safety and security,” Shenna Bellows (D) said during a Friday appearance on CNN.

On Thursday, Bellows said she had concluded the former president “over the course of several months and culminating on January 6, 2021, used a false narrative of election fraud to inflame his supporters and direct them to the Capitol to prevent certification of the 2020 election and the peaceful transfer of power.” Bellows’ decision made Maine the second state to take such an action, after the Colorado Supreme Court last week via a 4-3 ruling.

The weight of the evidence makes clear that Mr. Trump was aware of the tinder laid by his multi-month effort to delegitimize a democratic election, and then chose to light a match.”

Trump’s campaign has denounced the decision and called Bellows a “virulent leftist and a hyper-partisan Biden-supporting Democrat.”

“We are witnessing, in real-time, the attempted theft of an election and the disenfranchisement of the American voter,” Trump campaign spokesperson Steven Cheung said.


The original article contains 312 words, the summary contains 216 words. Saved 31%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there a legal procedure to voluntary tap own phone so all these things get tracked better and timely beforehand? If a public official knows they'd be soon targeted by a harassment campaign, might as well give up some privacy to ensure evidence against threatening individuals is collected as soon as possible.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yes, this would be a great way to draw some of them out and get them in prison, ideally. Not only would it keep them from joining an even larger organized violent effort, it would likely keep them from voting, too. win-win.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not surprising, given we are talking about the party/movement filled with fascists, oops, I mean, "law and order" types.