this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
29 points (93.9% liked)

Canada

8035 readers
882 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jadero@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Seems straightforward to me. It's pretty typical to permit testimony from those who were directly victimized. It's also pretty typical to permit impact statements from those indirectly victimized.

[–] TheMcG@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

Exactly what I was thinking. This just sounds like it would be a victim impact statement which serves very standard.

I also fail to see how it could possibly be considered irrelevant.

[–] MapleEngineer@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

But your honour it would be devastating to our case!

[–] baconisaveg@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

I think it would depend on what they're trying to charge him with.

[–] 44razorsedge@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Clowvnoy organizers fucked around and now don't want to find out. FTFY

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] Frederic@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

lock them up!

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I love when people who apparently work as writers get stuff like if/whether wrong.

Okay, I don't: they should know better.