The bills have greater value because you can carry more of them in less space and the savings in space can be used to pick up other objects.
this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2025
682 points (97.5% liked)
Greentext
6887 readers
1715 users here now
This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.
Be warned:
- Anon is often crazy.
- Anon is often depressed.
- Anon frequently shares thoughts that are immature, offensive, or incomprehensible.
If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The coins have greater value because you can put them in a sock and mug people, then get more money
Combine both with gold coins or, even more valuable, rhodium bars.
That is true imo. Don't want an evil woman with big tiddies as a gf
Ok but what if evil not as in the racist cat-kicker way but as in hot DC wizard of darkness way?
Anon realized they didn't have the required $100 consulting fee either in bills or in coins, so no obvious conclusions can be drawn from the conversation.
I legitimately love this stupid analogy.
Works for penises too.
A penis made of pennies
My penis is made of rai stones. You can look but don't touch.
load more comments
(3 replies)
The best tits are the ones someone decides to share with you.
<3
ACAB: All cup-sizes are beautiful
$100 in coins is way more valuable than bills. $100 in pennies is worth about $280 in scrap copper these days
Even though they're mostly zinc now?
You can sell them to Ea-nasir.
Apparently the calculator i used refers only to pre-1982 pennies. But those are still plentiful and can be found without issue
People are allowed to have their own preferences different from mine, but I'm always thrown off by the number of comments on the internet who insist they don't care about boob size.
Personally, I'm like the fake straight persona that Captain Holt puts on in Brooklyn 99: "I see a pair of thick, weighty breasts and all logic flies out the window."
For me, (a bi woman,) it depends on the context. If I'm surreptitiously checking out someone, then yeah, I have preferences. In practice, none of those preferences matter when I'm at motorboating distance from a partner's boobs. If I think of every set of boobs I have seen in that context, I can legitimately say I have no preference.
I don't know, I think that by the time it gets to that point, it's impossible to see the boobs as an abstract, aesthetically pleasing thing. Instead, I see them in the context of the entire person, and that feels infinitely more erotic. At first I thought that maybe it's a case of all the women I've slept with having boobs that fit their frame, but I don't think that's the case either. Big boobs on a small frame: Hot. Small boobs on a small frame: Hot. Big boobs on a large frame: Hot. Small boobs on a large frame: Hot. Wonky boobs on a medium frame: Hot.
Reflecting further, I think my mentality might be because some years ago, when I was tripping on 2CB, something clicked in me and I suddenly understood "beauty is in the eye of the beholder"; I realised that there was beauty and ugliness in everything, and I could just choose to see the beauty. It worked wonders for my own body confidence at the time, and I'm realising now that the sentiment has stuck with me deeper than I thought. I reckon that by the time I'm sleeping with someone, I've made an active choice to opt into seeing their beauty. If I weren't able to do that, I probably wouldn't get to the point of seeing them naked.
There's nothing more intoxicating than the clear absence of a penis.
Sincerely,
Matelt
load more comments
(3 replies)
There is also such a thing as too large of a breast.
Look up the largest breast record holder.
That’s too fucking big.
I think that the insistence of “not caring about boob size” is really saying “I like boobies in the typical size and shape range”.
Extremes would probably break this rule, but extremes are just that
load more comments
(4 replies)
Huh, I tend to feel bad for their mid to lower back in 5 to 10 years.
Why do you wait so long to feel bad for them?
Because I'm still young enough that somebody I'd be likely to date probably would have about that much time before such back problems would crop up... well, assuming they try to do at least a bit of physical activity every other day or so.
I guess if that last part was not the case, then the back problems due to uber booba would occur roughly presently, so, semi-touche on that.
You can't really tell from looks alone. I went to school with a girl who got a breast reduction at age 16 due to back problems. It didn't look crazy or anything or maybe she hid it well, but it was just some issue she had that no one knew about or would have guessed.
My old roommate back in the 90s did the same thing. She gave all of us "boys" a before photo before though lol. She was nice.
Her back problems got way better after.
Huh, that seems like a fairly rare occurence that you'd have to get it at age 16, but I do know that absolutely does happen.
... and/or me being from the US and your registered instance being... a Denmark instance?
Ya'll probably have actual healthcare over there, lol, and maybe such procedures are somewhat more common?
Yes, it was covered by health care. It's not common that early in life, but I think it makes sense to get it sorted out as soon as possible before it makes the issue worse. I have never thought much about it, but in hindsight I think it must have been hell for her to go through.
I agree, it does make sense to tackle something like that as a young adult / post pubescence teen, a human body generally tends to handle surgery recovery of pretty much any kind when its closer to age 20 than age 40... but the, I guess you'd call them 'social' downsides are massive, kids are often brutal and cruel to other kids for really, really stupid reasons.
load more comments
(8 replies)
These are my breasts, there are many like them, but these ones are mine
A friend was taking the piss out of NFTs once and I, not knowing what an NFT was at the time, misheard them as saying "non-fungible titties". We, all of us being very gay, found this hilarious because our experience of seeing breasts had shown us that breasts are indeed non-fungible.
Without me, my breasts are nothing, without my breasts, I am nothing.
Nah, without your breasts, you have value. Don't let cancer destroy your self-image.
A wise friend once said, "the best boobs are the ones you can touch."
load more comments
(7 replies)
I like smaller because I can fit more of them in my mouth. So far my record is still 1.
load more comments
(4 replies)
People ask guys if they're into tits or ass.
My answer has always been the same.
Legs.
Fit legs?
You're not gonna care about how big or small the t or a is or isn't.
If someone asked me, I'd say tits. But that's all tits. I don't discriminate.
Respectable answer.
...but lets test your lack of discrimination.
Porque no los tres? Eh?
load more comments
(2 replies)
view more: next ›