this post was submitted on 07 May 2023
0 points (NaN% liked)

askchapo

23078 readers
79 users here now

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer ~~thought-provoking~~ questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you're having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
PorkrollPosadist@hexbear.net
replaceable@hexbear.net
VILenin@hexbear.net
EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net
SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
khizuo@hexbear.net
Sulvy@hexbear.net
0
(CW: Ableism) Should we start banning ableist language here? (www.verywellmind.com)
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by stinky@hexbear.net to c/askchapo@hexbear.net
NSFW 2 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

We already do this with some slurs, right? We can start enforcing these words, too.

Not calling anyone out, I’ve been guilty of it too. And we don’t have to do it all at once. Like, we can start with these:

Ableist words and alternatives.

Stupid, R€tarded, Idiot(ic), Cretin, or Moron(ic): People say this to imply something, or someone isn't intelligent or worth their time, but the words refer to people with intellectual disabilities. Instead, say that a situation or person is frustrating, ignorant, dense, unpleasant, cheesy, or awful.

Dumb: This word refers to a person who doesn't speak verbally, but people often use it to mean that something or someone isn't intelligent or wise. It's listed separately from stupid and its synonyms because it references a physical disability instead of an intellectual one. Try using any of the non-ableist synonyms like irritating or uncool.

Crazy, Nuts, Mad, Psycho, or Insane: "Wow, that's crazy!" may not seem like a harmful statement, but if you think about someone with a mental health condition hearing that statement, it's easy to realize that it is. So instead of using one of those words, try outrageous, bananas, bizarre, amazing, intense, extreme, overwhelming, or wild.

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Oddity@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

It's already too restrictive, just leave it alone.

[–] edge@hexbear.net 1 points 2 years ago

but the words refer to people with intellectual disabilities

No, they don't. They haven't in a long time. They can be used in an ableist way, but most use of those words aren't. They're very different from stuff like the r word.

Instead, say that a situation or person is frustrating, ignorant, dense, unpleasant, cheesy, or awful.

That just sounds like a euphemism treadmill. But also I'd argue those words could also be used in ableist ways. Frustrating, dense, and unpleasant I could definitely see being used against autistic people (like me), but that doesn't mean they should be avoided in general, even to describe a person.

Dumb: This word refers to a person who doesn’t speak verbally

Does it though? Has anyone used it that way in the past few decades? Hell the way it's used has absolutely nothing to do with the inability to speak, it's unrelated.