this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
94 points (99.0% liked)

Canada

10215 readers
660 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 55 points 3 days ago (4 children)

There is another potential problem for Poilievre. Critchley is right. Parachute candidates always face a potential backlash when they drop into ridings because they have lost their own seats. That’s because there is something fundamentally opportunistic and unfair about replacing a successful local candidate with an unsuccessful national one. Does Poilievre care about the riding or, as Critchley believes, is he just using it as the safest way to become an MP before Parliament is recalled?

This is a great point I’m surprised hasn’t been talked about more. Pierre is running on a party-over-country campaign.

[–] veeesix@lemmy.ca 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Also even if he does succeed, he’ll probably never outlive the “Parachute Pierre” nickname for the rest of his career.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 26 points 3 days ago

He even stole this poor kitty’s look.

[–] Sturgist@lemmy.ca 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Also even if he does succeed, he’ll probably never outlive the “Smöl Parachute ~PP~” nickname for the rest of his career.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago

Yup, to me he is creepy little pp.

[–] bowreality@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago

He won’t show up for the local debate either I heard. I would very much vote for somebody local if I were in that riding. Especially when he bumps somebody who got elected and then doesn’t care enough to show up.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

The riding he's running in would elect an aardvark if it was labeled "conservative". Who's on the ballot or what they stand for have little impact. The question is if it will be with 80 percent, or "just" 70.

Edit: I need to revise this since it's going to be write-ins. It holds true if writing "conservative" will count, but actually writing Pierre Poilievre would sorely test most voters.

[–] StillPaisleyCat@startrek.website 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

This local article and interview with the candidate who defeated Poilievre includes a photo of Poilievre’s former constituency office in his Carleton riding.

One has to wonder about the lack of signage on the actual office and apparent challenges in accessibility.

Le Droit article

[–] rekabis@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 days ago

Should he lose, his political career would be over.

That’s a full-chub, full-mast outcome if I ever heard of one.

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"Military vet" with a picture of a horse, I thought it was a veterinarian at first 🤷

[–] Sunshine@piefed.ca 5 points 2 days ago

Maybe the horse should run against PP as well 🤔

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 days ago

Yes, please.

[–] eatCasserole@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Tellingly, Poilievre blamed that loss in Carleton on being too honest

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

LOL He lost because we had a candidate that actually gives a shit about our riding, and is not human trash.