this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
1120 points (97.9% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

33532 readers
3863 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 107 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Hey now, that's a misrepresentation of both the US and China.

China had way nicer locomotives in 96. It wasn't 1896.

And in the US, that guy would have either been replaced by a machine, or replaced by someone younger who won't be expecting the seniority and pay raises that being there for over 20 years usually gets you.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] caboose2006@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

US Train travel has actually gotten worse since 1996.

[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 4 points 2 days ago

Came to say this. If it had literally remained unchanged they'd still be doing pretty good.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Prior_Industry@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Hyperloop any day now!

[–] xantonin@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (2 children)

This is because public transportation is socialism and we can't have tax dollars going to that pretext for communism. Capitalism is far superior which is why we are instead spending over $150 billion on deporting immigrants, which will help promote a free and open capitalist market.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Weird to compare a brutal dictatorship which violates human rights on the regular vs a democracy which violates human rights a little less.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

a brutal dictatorship which violates human rights on the regular

Don't you think you're a little harsh on the US?

[–] teamevil@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

So far...give Trump time and he'll catch right up.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 82 points 4 days ago (1 children)

What hypercapitalism lobbied by big oil does to your country.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Honytawk 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Well, the most efficient form of government is a dictatorship, which nobody want except the dictator.

An inefficient government has groups investigating other groups to see if what they are doing is correct. This process takes time, so things move much slower. But is generally a much better protection against corruption.

[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You say that, but... Iraq was a dictatorship, and they weren't all that efficient at anything other than killing Kurds.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

That's because they're politically illiterate. The important difference is the economic model and its end goal. Is it to make a small elite super rich? Is it to meet the peoples' needs? The US is extremely efficient in creating a small class of super rich people (and by that I mean corporations too) while China is extremely efficient in switching to renewable energy and expanding high speed rail.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Well, the most efficient form of government is a dictatorship, which nobody want except the dictator.

I mean... some people do, but they're weird.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 46 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (5 children)

this is kind of an exaggeration, but still crazy to think about. in a way similar to when we think of space exploration in the 60s today.

we can achieve so much so fast when we actually put some effort into caring about it.

[–] mriswith@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

It's exaggerated and massively understated depending on location.

There are several metro areas in the US with over 1 million people that has zero metro/subway or light rail, some of them don't even have a passenger train connections or stations, or at most it stops by once or twice a day. Places like Columbus Ohio that has literally zero rail passenger rail for over 2m people in the metro area. If you want to take the train from there to NYC you'll have to spend a couple of hours on a bus to a different city first. And it's not like they never had it, they razed the train station in the 70s.

Other places that lack light rail or metro and have 1m+ people in the metro area: Tampa, San Antonio, Indianapolis, Oklahoma, Memphis, Richmond, Louisville, Rochester, etc. with many of them having a very bad outside passenger train connections. There are also a bunch of others that almost slipped by or did stay off the list over technicalities like having a single tram line going up and down main street or similar. Places like Orlando, Cincinatti, etc.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 16 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I wonder if the early proliferation of rural cars / mega expressways kinda fucked us. When your transportation network grows around trains, upgrading the trains/rails makes good economic sense. We just kind of spread out everywhere quickly and made the train locations somewhat irrelevant.

[–] newaccountwhodis@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

We just kind of spread out everywhere quickly and made the train locations somewhat irrelevant.

Do you know any US history

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I know enough that it wasn't so much lobbying as it was advertising to the to the US citizens that made cars more popular. Ford figured out how to make it affordable then a bunch of companies that stood to make money on cars bought up streetcars and shut them down in favor of busses, but that doesn't actually answer the demise of long distance rail.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

No the auto industry has lobbied against trains and similar projects. It’s not about the science but more about how our politicians have been selling their souls for centuries.

[–] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 5 points 2 days ago

Pretty much part of the plot from Who Framed Roger Rabbit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mniot@programming.dev 12 points 3 days ago

No, because cross-country trains and heavy use of them to move goods and people predates cars by quite a bit. Trains were a key component of the North winning the Civil War, for example.

Lots of existing train infrastructure needed to be torn out to make room for car infrastructure.

[–] Ronno 5 points 2 days ago

If anything, shouldn't that make it easier? The US has quite open and wide streets/roads. You have more space to build stations and rail tracks than for example Europe with much narrower streets/roads.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (13 children)

In Capitalist nations, the further we are from the era of peak Unions and in general civil society movements (which was just after WWII) the slower infrastructure improves from one year to the next, something visible not just in trains but at all levels (even National Health Services for those countries which have them).

The same thing will happen in China now that they're getting more Capitalist than Socialist.

It was never the Capitalist part doing the kind of improvements that benefit most people, it was the stuff outside Capitalism (that used it as a Trade Philosophy only) constraining it and guiding it for policy ends which were independent of Capitalism.

This slowing of improvements of course itself accelerated with Neoliberalism, since that stuff is mainly about making Capitalism the sole definer of policy, or in other words make Capitalism the entirety of politics, hence unconstrained and unguided by interests other than those of Money, so ever less policy was done for the greater good.

Capitalism is reasonably decent at optimizing Trade in the short and mid-term, but is completelly shit for non-Trade interests such as Quality Of Life, as well as for anything which doesn't have direct and reasonably immediate action-consequence links such as situations where negative effects are very delayed in time (for example, companies enshittifying their products but keeping on going for years on the inertia of brand name) or emergent in nature (i.e. things that appear due to the accumulation of the actions of many actors, such as Global Warming).

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Not just trains but all transportation services and systems is severely lacking in this country. Along with crumbling infrastructure and terrible build quality of cars and trucks and you got a recipe for disaster. But no one will care cuz Merica!

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

yeah it's so funny when people think the US has good car infrastructure, the truth is that the US just generally fucking sucks

yeah sure there's a lot of interstate highways which i guess you can consider good, but most people aren't using them for very large distances, most people are driving to and from work every day and that part is so hilariously miserable that i don't think people in the rest of the world truly believe it's a real thing that happens..

[–] WanderWisley@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Agreed! I live in a very rural part of the country and the conditions of the roads and highways are laughable.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 13 hours ago

not just that, but the design itself is often actively counterproductive, and the fact that driving is often the only way to get around means the roads are forced to handle an insane amount of traffic.

i like to say that the nordics are an example of actual car-centric design: the roads are simple and efficient and the other modes of transport are good enough, which means there aren't thousands and thousands of incompetent and unwilling drivers on the roads.

[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 57 points 4 days ago (4 children)

China 2060: ..... a space elevator

USA 2060: .... still the same rail service

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xorollo@leminal.space 9 points 3 days ago

That conductor is a total hottie tho

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 51 points 4 days ago (2 children)

yeah, anti public transit has several motivations, the most American is racism. if we have robust public transit, they can't be "whites only" and you can't force the not-whites to sit in the back. so right there. Then you have white land owning hegemony. Why do the busses only go downtown and not to the shopping center half way to the suburbs? because they don't want the filthy poors mucking up their white fort, if you let busses go up to the suburbs then THEY can get there and do all the things they get blamed for!! Lastly, profit motive. mass transit means people can choose to have a car or not. the powers that be are making a lot of money off cars and mass transit will upset the apple cart.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dan69@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

America: if ain’t broke don’t fix it Every other country: yah it’s time, what are our new requirements?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›