this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2025
592 points (99.2% liked)

Games

40941 readers
1399 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Rules

1. Submissions have to be related to games

Video games, tabletop, or otherwise. Posts not related to games will be deleted.

This community is focused on games, of all kinds. Any news item or discussion should be related to gaming in some way.

2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

No bigotry, hardline stance. Try not to get too heated when entering into a discussion or debate.

We are here to talk and discuss about one of our passions, not fight or be exposed to hate. Posts or responses that are hateful will be deleted to keep the atmosphere good. If repeatedly violated, not only will the comment be deleted but a ban will be handed out as well. We judge each case individually.

3. No excessive self-promotion

Try to keep it to 10% self-promotion / 90% other stuff in your post history.

This is to prevent people from posting for the sole purpose of promoting their own website or social media account.

4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

This community is mostly for discussion and news. Remember to search for the thing you're submitting before posting to see if it's already been posted.

We want to keep the quality of posts high. Therefore, memes, funny videos, low-effort posts and reposts are not allowed. We prohibit giveaways because we cannot be sure that the person holding the giveaway will actually do what they promise.

5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

Make sure to mark your stuff or it may be removed.

No one wants to be spoiled. Therefore, always mark spoilers. Similarly mark NSFW, in case anyone is browsing in a public space or at work.

6. No linking to piracy

Don't share it here, there are other places to find it. Discussion of piracy is fine.

We don't want us moderators or the admins of lemmy.world to get in trouble for linking to piracy. Therefore, any link to piracy will be removed. Discussion of it is of course allowed.

Authorized Regular Threads

Related communities

PM a mod to add your own

Video games

Generic

Help and suggestions

By platform

By type

By games

Language specific

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EldenLord@lemmy.world 63 points 2 days ago

We got GoonerGate before the release of the Epstein files

[–] Boiglenoight@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Are we still doing phrasing also thank god they’re not coming for the ultra violence and graphic scenes of bodily dismemberment

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Can we crowdfund a big lawsuit against those responsible for this?

Or use cryptocurrency more

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Against banks? I love the enthusiasm but this is not the way. Banks as a whole have many of the best lawyers in the game on retainer (possession is 9/10ths of the law, and this industry banks on that and make bank.) The best crowdfunding campaign in history* is 800 million. The banks would be willing to spend at least that in their own defence.

*not including investments (nor blockchain)

Plus, a progressive lawsuit in this environment? Might backfire spectacularly - right now banks are cautiously picking on 'safe' targets. But with a green light from the supreme court the banks could go full Nazi. Yeah - there's nothing good I can reasonably expect here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 56 points 2 days ago

All my homies hate Collective Shout

[–] bbsm3678@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago (10 children)

I find it funny that a lot of the fediverse is anti-cryptocurrency, yet this is a perfect example of a problem cryptocurrency can solve. No one can stop you from transacting on a number of blockchains.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If it was used as an actual currency instead of an investment vehicle for speculators, that would help.

It also has zero protection from scams and fraud.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 48 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

In theory, crypto could be good for this, but crypto is used (and designed) more as an investment than a transaction tool.

Also, the issue here is not centralized currency under a government, it's centralized payment processing under monopolistic private companies. Crypto is not required to solve that, all that is needed is an alternative payment processor (in an ideal world, probably a public one run by that government, since in a modern world that seems like an essential service to me).

[–] FishFace@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's a good point, but a payment processor run by the government would also be under pressure (from voters) to wield its power to suppress marginal content.

Imagine a US-government-run payment processor right now - it would be blocking anyone that sells anything "woke" or "DEI".

[–] Mk23simp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I am a strong believer in democracy. I don't think that the answer to a bad government is to reduce the power of the government, because that power will inevitably go to undemocratic institutions. Only the government is accountable to the people. So even when the government is currently controlled by people I dislike, I still want more things to be brought under the power of the government rather than privatized.

The answer to bad government actions, in my view, is to fight for a more democratic government, and zealously advocate for good ideas among the voting population.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 17 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Crypto is so heavily regulated now, I don't even know how to procure any cause all the sites I have used years ago are just dead now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 46 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

I don't get it. Do payment processors want less money? Do they hate being entrenched and bringing in revenue just for existing? Do they want us to try and find alternatives to them?

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Holy fuck why did Collective Shout go full nuclear and go behind the platforms’ back and straight to the payment processors. Like they could have at least talk to the Itch.io people.

[–] pulsewidth@lemmy.world 49 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If they wanted any games banned all they had to do was talk to the Office of Film and Literature Classification (OFLC) in Australia, where they're based. Any of the games listed would have likely been added to the 'Refused Classification' list and thereby banned from sale and import in Australia. If they wanted them pulled from Steam or Itch entirely they could have talked to those platforms.

But they didn't want to raise objections through appropriate preexisting channels, they wanted to push their Christian-based ideology on the whole world by going Karen on the social media of all the payment processors.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Zexks@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

Hmmm. Could porn once again because the medium catalyst for bitcoin to take off.

[–] LikeableLime@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago (2 children)

How do platforms like Patreon and OnlyFans circumvent this? I know OF had issues with payment processors in the past but I'm not sure what changes they implemented to stay compliant. There must be some way for itch.io to keep these things on their platform while not pissing off the payment processors (who can go fuck themselves btw, this is completely unnecessary)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›