this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
512 points (99.6% liked)

World News

48585 readers
2229 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boovard@lemmy.world 93 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Why not ban lobbying completely?

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because lobbying is also done be environmental groups, neighborhood groups, consumer activists, ... Ban lobbying would deprive a large set of the population of their voice

[–] traceur201@piefed.social 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

but it seems that this method of communication completely drowned out by moneyed interests

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 15 points 1 day ago

And if you kill it, money still finds its way somehow but the others don't. The problem is money.

[–] monogram 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This! only allow petitions as the method to steer law.

Power to the people needs money to be insignificant for the process of law

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lobbying is literally a form of petitioning.

[–] monogram 10 points 1 day ago

Except, instead of using democratic methods you use Money 💰

[–] tyler@programming.dev 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That would outlaw scientists lobbying the government to stop things like global warming and pollution. It would stop mom and pop shops from lobbying against things that are good for massive corps but bad for them.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Paid corporate lobbying should end.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So what defines corporate? What defines paid? You’re excluding mom and pop shops and even medium sized businesses from your definition. How are lawmakers supposed to know if their law is gonna harm specific industries if businesses can’t tell them?

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Paid is by definition anyone paid to do the lobbying. Corporate is definitely harder to define, but let’s say you’re only allowed to lobby on behalf of your own organization (or self)

And, better yet, let’s make every single lobbying effort public - Times, dates, people involved, and the subject raised (but perhaps not the outcome). Good legislation should happen in the open

[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So paid would include the owners (if it’s an llc or similar), it would include anyone sent by the owners even if it’s not their job title, etc.

I’m pretty sure you can request all that information as well, with a FOIA request.

[–] alexc@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

I concede this is complicated, but i think we can all agree that paid lobbying groups are a cancer on society.

[–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah agreed. I just don’t see how you exclude them without unintended consequences.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And when the EU writes a regulation like mandating USB-C chargers, they'll make sure the companies making phones are on board and get to have realistic timelines to implement these things. If you're going to regulate an industry you kind of need their expertise, unfortunately.

[–] kungen@feddit.nu 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You can still consult with various interest groups without allowing actually lobbying, but I get what you mean.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, ideally it should be government going to industry bodies, unions, etc if they need to know more about the topic they're trying to regulate instead of the current system where industry groups are basically writing laws.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

revoke lobbying access

Me, as an American: ...I can haz? Plez?

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Sorry, Amazon has billions more free speech tickets than you do

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

DO IT, Come on already!

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

Yes yes yes yes yes please

But don't just do it for Amazon, do it for all parties.

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hi, im Beff Jesoz and I have a company called Nozama and I'll give you 10 billion dollars to stop this.

[–] lemmyknow@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago

Beef Jeezos?! Omg, he real!