this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
92 points (100.0% liked)

Science

23467 readers
52 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

It essentially tells the body to produce certain proteins that stimulate the immune system – including a protein within cancer cells known as PD-L1 (Programmed Death-Ligand 1), which makes tumors become more visible to immune cells.

The researchers found a way to induce PD-L1 expression inside tumors using a generalized mRNA vaccine, essentially tricking the cancer cell into exposing itself, so immunotherapy can be more effective.

In this study on mice with melanoma, the vaccine was able to clear existing tumors that had proven drug-resistant. In other cancer models, including brain, skin and bone, the drug was even able to wipe out tumors without the assistance of any other treatment.

This approach is a little unorthodox in a field moving increasingly more towards personalized medicine with a precise target in the crosshairs.

Universal cancer vaccine is quite an ambitious and sensationalized headline. While treatment of glioblastoma is nothing to shake a stick at, there's a lot more studies in mice than there are successful drugs for people.

It seems limited in value if the cancer is calling from inside the house with immune cell cancers. It seems probable to me that any highly metabolic tissue could absorb some of the uh oh ligand encoded in the mRNA, become immune targets, and set of an autoimmune disease. This would be double jeopardy during cancer which would also be exhausting for your immune system.

Each cancer is a cell crashing the fuck out and I'm skeptical of anybody who has a cure for crashing out writ large. If the cell is weak to something, your other cells are weak to it too. I like the idea of a personalized treatment so you could say things like "my tumor is like my cells that are high in PEEPEE1 but they're unique in that they're also high in POOPOO2, so my treatment is

If PEEPEE1 AND POOPOO2{

Apoptosis(now)

}

[–] Carl@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago

This would be super cool but I look forward to reading about how a pharma company somehow got ahold of all of the research docs and buried them twenty years from now.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 25 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] sovietknuckles@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago

At the cost of US cancer patients no longer traveling to Cuba for a cancer vaccine, since they did it first a decade ago

[–] TheRogueKitten@hexbear.net 20 points 1 day ago (4 children)

For the low, low price of $999,999.99.

They'll monetize it so fast and hard.

[–] Sodium_nitride@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago

The Chinese, Russians and likely Indians will probably make so.ething similar, so it's not all doom and gloom.

At least the labor aristocrats of the west will be able to fly to these places for medical tourism, so all is well (/s)

[–] iie@hexbear.net 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I’m optimistic on that front. First, this is public-sector research, and second, the approach seems inexpensive and hard to copyright. A lipid nanoparticle is not that special; there are multiple ways to formulate them (some are native to your body), and already there are (I assume) multiple competing firms that can produce them cheaply in large quantities, thanks in part to the pandemic. As for the mRNA sequence packaged inside the nanoparticles, I think if you publish that sequence in a research paper it’s considered factual information that cannot be copyrighted? And furthermore, there are probably multiple valid sequences that would work, maybe even a large number of them. I can’t imagine anyone getting a monopoly on something like this, especially with the enormous demand for it.

*I’m not an expert though, and it just occurred to me that, by the same logic, insulin should be cheap, but iirc it costs hundreds a month in the US

[–] kristina@hexbear.net 7 points 1 day ago

The current study tests are actually priced around 2 mill so yk aim higher

[–] KoboldKomrade@hexbear.net 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"It """cost"""* us 10 trillion dollars to develop and 100000 per dose*. Sorry peasant, just reality works!"

*Subsidized by the government and profits of other patents they "obtained". *100000 per dose in America, $1 per dose everywhere else.

(Its so cool that my prescriptions would be 1k+ for the 4th most common, ~20 year old anti-depressant, and what is (basically) literal meth.)

[–] TheRogueKitten@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

..."And travel to other countries for use is illegal and results in 20 years for copyright infringement"

[–] CrawlMarks@hexbear.net 10 points 1 day ago

This is the third report I have heared of a mRNA nanotechnology based gene editing thrrepy come up o in the past few days. Did some lab just get some new grants or what? Did like a big journal just put out a quartlery issue?

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 21 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Elias Sayour has spent a decade working to harness the power of mRNA science in order to effectively treat cancer.

Welp, when he gets deported I hope he puts his talents to good use somewhere he'll be better appreciated. Like China.

Yes, we are in fact stupid enough to deport valuable talent.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

even a vaccine not specific to any particular tumor or virus – so long as it is an mRNA vaccine – could lead to tumor-specific effects

Basically, the vaccine would train the immune system to recognize general properties associated with a broad range of tumors.

[–] loomy@lemy.lol 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 day ago

it's still in development

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago

Florida finally doing something good for once?