this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2025
321 points (93.3% liked)

Linux

56466 readers
1166 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I realized my VLC was broke some point in the week after updating Arch. I spend time troubleshooting then find a forum post with replies from an Arch moderator saying they knew it would happen and it's my fault for not wanting to read through pages of changelogs. Another mod post says they won't announce that on the RSS feed either. I thought I was doing good by following the RSS but I guess that's not enough.

I've been happily using Arch for 5 years but after reading those posts I've decided to look for a different distro. Does anyone have recommendations for the closest I can get to Arch but with a different attitude around updating?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Ah yes, the issue with modern Linux, the community.

I feel the shift to the current "git gud" style of blaming the user in any support has done more damage to Linux then any part of the software.

[–] freewheel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm amazed at the idea that in any technical community, an urging to gain more skill in your chosen environment could somehow be seen as negative.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would make a joke here about arch and gatekeeping but its not just an arch issue.

[–] freewheel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It is most certainly not. (He says, as he comes fuming out of yet another meeting about a ticket that could have been solved at Tier 2 if support would learn how to read a log)

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Oh pebkac is alive and well, no doubt about it. But expecting any level of expertise from an non commercial end user while simultaneously shooting down their questions is not going to help.

[–] freewheel@sh.itjust.works 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I absolutely agree, but here's the problem in this context:

  • OP isn't non-commercial. By their own words, they'd been doing desktop support for MacOS - plastic-wrapped and glittery, but still a *nix. Five years in, one's search-fu and tolerance for reading docs should be well developed.
  • Their question was answered by the page they found. OP's argument is they didn't like the tone used to reply to THAT post's OP and concluded from that tone that their expertise wouldn't be valued "in the way they would like". There's room to develop some grit here.
  • Arch isn't intended for inexperienced users, and that is made clear in the docs. "It is targeted at the proficient GNU/Linux user, or anyone with a do-it-yourself attitude who is willing to read the documentation, and solve their own problems." (https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_Linux#User_centrality) Getting this upset over a single package readjustment, no matter how badly it was communicated, tells me OP doesn't have a ton of experience with bare metal linux. There's just no way to sugarcoat that.

Arch gatekeeps on occasion, yes, but this isn't that. This is the simple rules of that particular distro. OP is free to find something that better fits their needs; and it appears they have.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 1 points 17 hours ago

I see no problems with someone showing frustration, and in this case I don't think arch should be proud of this example.

This is very much that, and why arch has the reputation it does. It will always be a fringe distro with the way the people (you included) shame and gatekeep.

[–] jumping_redditor@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

the community is the worst part of most things, the RTFM attitude is better than toxic positivity though

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sure, but when I am looking for an answer toxic positivity and RTFM are often the same thing. The number of times people jump up to defend the manual and glaze the program without even checking if the info is in the manual (or if the manual even makes sense at all) is way too high.

I used to have to work on new stuff all the time and would have to read whitepapers or engineering change docs on the daily, and no the tangled mess most Linux documentation is in does not count as a functioning source of information.

The part that still grinds my gears is why bother to type out nothing of value like RTFM at all? Forums are filled with terrible posts belittleing the question instead of just answering the question. Its not helping anyone and at least to me makes little sense.

[–] Flatfire@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I don't feel like this is a terribly recent attitude. It's definitely one I've encountered repeatedly over a decade or more of dipping my toes in the pool. It's not incorrect in a lot of circumstances, but it's very difficult to find support when no one wants to help you improve. There's always been a significant degree of ego in Linux user communities.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Not wanting to help would be better then this, its like they just want to "win" the support ticket. Its so terribly counterproductive.

[–] WhiteOakBayou@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

I agree, people were telling me to RTFM in support chats on irc 30 years ago.

[–] BullCrapDetekta33@lemmings.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

omg you guys are fragile af

I just had this exact same issue. I installed the package. Done.

No whining. It's one fucking line of code.

They are not tech support. Maybe call applecare.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Why even type this?

Do you feel better doing so?

This is not a support forum, this is not tech support, this is lemmy and other then giving a great example of what the OP is getting at what does your comment address?

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago

IMHO the actual problem here is the Arch moderator being an ass.

This happens in all operating systems from time to time. An update kills an app. Usually, the app is wildly out of date and hanging on to the last vestiges of a deprecated call that finally gets removed. I recently experienced this with V4L (for OBS virtual camera) and a kernel update in NixOS. Had one hell of a time tracking it down. It was one of the twice-yearly OS upgrades. Luckily, I had only updated one of my devices, and it still worked on the old one. After tearing apart the changes, I was finally able to specify V4L and a Linux kernel version. Immediately, the problem popped right out. The new kernel now needs a specific value passed for the expected video stream, where it used to use a default if it wasn't specified.

Apple breaks apps all the time. Windows does, but less so. The difference is usually before an update happens, Windows and Apple have had TONs of people testing on their own teams and their insiders people.

In the end, I just needed to roll back the kernel one revision until the V4L guys make the change, or I needed to recompile V4L myself with the option defaulted to something useful.

I don't think you can safely get away from this kind of issue. (app incompatibility on upgrade, not mods being an ass)

Debian or Mint seem to be pretty welcoming and easy going to get rid of the asshole issues, but chances are, you're going to break something eventually, and it's going to be super hard to figure out why and how to get around it.

[–] Marn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

If that happened to me I'd not want to deal with that again either.

What has made arch work for me is BTRFS filesystem with the grub module grub-btrfs. It gives you BTRFS snapshots you can load into at grub and with snapper and auto snap it will automatically create a restore point before updating.

It's worked flawlessly and thanks to BTRFS black magic the snapshots don't take up much storage space. I also recommend BTRFS assistant in the aur if you don't mind using a gui.

If you want an easy arch setup + friendly community forums + easy BTRFS setup I can't recommended EndevourOS enough.

[–] dajoho@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I got burned by something like this on Manjaro when a rolling update completely borked my graphics card. The devs reacted in a similar way and it made me realise that my priority is stability over bleeding edge and tinkering.

On that day I moved to Fedora. Stable as hell, no fuss. My main OS should just work and not kill itself.

I still love it but jumped over to Bazzite Gnome recently, which is like Fedora with a few bells on top, coupled with having a read-only root-filesystem (stability, man!). It also comes with distrobox, which will let you run arch natively in a container if you need the AUR.

[–] No1@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I had a similar moment of clarity after troubles with Manjaro and a couple other Arch based distros.

I really like the idea of a rolling release, but definitely nedd stability first.

I swung back the other way, and jumped on Ubuntu LTS. And gradually over time I ended up having to get updates from external repos etc, and ended up in the same position where updates broke things or didn't work.

Currently running Ubuntu, and I just do an upgrade to the latest release each 6 months - after waiting a month after release date for everything to settle down. The upgrades to new releases have gone smoothly, I get updates to newer versions of software, and it's been very rare anything breaks. Being a popular distro also means a big community to help with any issues as well.

Dammit, it's like I just wrote an ad for Ubuntu!

[–] Maragato@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I left Arch for the same reason but in relation to my system's graphics. If you are an end user, an operating system should work for you, not you for the system. I installed Tumbleweed 5 years ago and its snapper tool gives great peace of mind when using a rolling system. My advice, try Tumbleweed, its package manager (zypper) already supports parallel downloads and although it is slower than pacman, it is more complete in package and repository management (an example is what has happened in Arch recently with firmware packages and that requires manual user intervention because pacman cannot make those changes automatically).

[–] KiwiTB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

LMDE. Debian stability with the usability of mint. It works.... That's it. No gimmicks.

[–] bitwolf@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 days ago

I use Fedora its a good reliable in between distro if you like fast updates but want tested updates.

[–] theparadox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I switched from Manjaro to Bazzite on my gaming PC. I don't have time to read changelogs.

Things went fantastically so I put Kinoite on my laptop. I do a lot more random shit on the laptop so it's a bit more complicated but so far so good. Atomic distros take getting used to but it still feels less stressful than coming back to my computer after a few days and digging through like 100+ package updates and eventually saying "Fuck it" and just updating blindly.

[–] rolandtb303@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

yeah i had that happen to me too, didn't look in the update screen because updates before went with a breeze but i took another look after VLC wouldn't play anything, it was something with the VLC plugins and i needed to reinstall those, just had to do sudo pacamn -S vlc-plugins-all to get VLC to play video files back, but man, that should have been in the news imo.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 96 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (36 children)

Based on what you describe, I would strongly recommend going with OpenSUSE Tumbleweed. It's just as bleeding-edge as Arch, but all packages go through automatic testing to ensure they won't break anything, and if some manual actions are required, it will offer options right before update. Moreover, snapper in enabled by default on btrfs partitions, and it makes snapshots automatically before updates, so even if something breaks somehow, reverting takes a few seconds.

One small footnote is that you'll need to add separate VLC repo or Packman for VLC to have full functionality - proprietary codecs are one of the rare things official repos don't feature for legal reasons.

On Arch rant: I've always been weirded out by this "Arch is actually stable, you just have to watch every news post for manual interventions before every update, oh, and you better update very often" attitude.

Like, no, this is not called stable or even usable for general audience. Updating your system and praying for it not to break while studying everything you need to know is antithetical to stability and makes for an awful daily driver.

[–] kilgore_trout@feddit.it 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I upvoted you, I am a fellow openSUSE fan and contributor.

But I need to point out that if you install VLC from a repository outside of Factory, then it's not auto-tested.

Moreover, Packman is external to the openSUSE project altogether. If you use it, you are supposed to "just trust" that everything will be fine.

You are better off installing VLC through Flatpak.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (35 replies)
[–] brisk@aussie.zone 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been an Arch user for more than a decade and I'll usually be first in line to defend it from dodgy claims about unreliability.

But that forum response is bizarre. Literally the last two RSS items right now are about how splitting packages will require intervention for some users (plasma and Linux firmware). VLC is an officially supported package, and surely this change would impact almost every VLC user?

New opt-depends is a nice pacman feature, but it hardly implies that things have been removed from the base package.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peetabix@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm running EndeavourOS and waiting for something like this to happen.

[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I ran Endeavour OS for 3 years, and it had a habit of breaking to no return every couple of months. I still liked it, but just got tired of that issue. Cachy OS has been much better

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DonutsRMeh@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Cachy OS has been treating me very well. Perfect all around. Very helpful people and very nice. I am not going anywhere

[–] daggermoon@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago (6 children)

The same thing happened to me. The package was split into separate packages. Install the package vlc-plugins-all.

sudo pacman -S vlc-plugins-all

Problem solved

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›