this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2025
836 points (98.6% liked)

tumblr

4710 readers
477 users here now

Welcome to /c/tumblr, a place for all your tumblr screenshots and news.

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Must be tumblr related. This one is kind of a given.

  4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.

  5. No unnecessary negativity. Just because you don't like a thing doesn't mean that you need to spend the entire comment section complaining about said thing. Just downvote and move on.


Sister Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MuteDog@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Iif terrorists were actually that big of a threat they would simply blow up the massive security line out in front of security.

[–] NIB@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fun fact, in Europe you dont have to remove your shoes, yet noone has bombed any planes.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Flew back from Mexico last week and got to keep my shoes on. We all survived

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

That's because you got lucky and boarded an Airbus.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Unfortunately, it was a 737 Max. So maybe I got lucky.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, but only because they didn't let you bring a water bottle! Imagine what would happen if you could just carry liquid onto the plane!!1!1!1!

[–] paskaeu25@lemmy.world 26 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Ay least electronics in registered baggage is not a joke. Once we travelled with big group of scuba divers. And one diver had his torch in the cabin bag. It was wrapped into socks to prevent it from breaking. Some way the torch got turned on. (Scuba diving torches are really powerful, thus heat decently). As a result socks heated up and smoke appeared in the whole plane. Nobody had any idea where the smoke is coming from. The personnel was running back and forth trying to find where it comes from. Their arms were shaking. No result. Even though alcohol on board was only for extra charge, personnel started offering it for free to passengers (probably to calm them down).

Eventually one of scuba divers decided to check his cabin bag. After opening it the huge amount of smoke rushed out of the bag.

It ended up well. It's good that it wasn't in the baggage section of the plane, coz fire could have started in there.

So electronics in baggage prohibition is no joke.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 22 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I initially thought you meant like a cutting torch and was very concerned, but then remembered torch is also used to refer to flashlights/handheld lights lol

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

...Which is something that TSA would fully allow onto the plane and might not even qualify as "electronics" to be removed during checkin.

[–] WhatGodIsMadeOf@feddit.org 25 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

America thrives off of marketing a sense of security. That's one of the ways they gain ownership of your soul and humanity.

I hear they are eating cats and dogs.

[–] TheKMAP@lemmynsfw.com 12 points 19 hours ago

That's not dropping all the protocols, it's upgrading everyone to PreCheck

[–] atthecoast 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

In Schiphol Airport at least you keep your shoes on (not boots, shoes), and electronics can stay in your bag. The bag goes through a kind of MRI and that’s enough for them to see the difference vs older x-ray equipment. Pretty convenient

[–] Paper_Phrog@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Yes, but now we cannot bring our water anymore. Any idea why that changed?

[–] kossa@feddit.org 13 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Having kids was that moment for me. Let me tell you: with children you are allowed to take as much liquid as you want through security. Even boiling water, to prepare formula 😂

I was like "WHAT? Why do you take it away for other passengers?" Just so they have to buy shitty, overpriced beverages, or what?

[–] cactusupyourbutt@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

pro tip, you are allowed to bring empty bottles that you can fill up in the bathroom sinks

[–] kossa@feddit.org 1 points 1 hour ago

I know. More and more airports even have water dispensers for that reason. But I've been to airports, where I'd rather not drink the tap water, be it for the taps themselves, the water quality or the water taste.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago

That's because no parent would ever be a terrorist. What kind of a heartless monster would put their kids in danger?

terrorist organizations begin recruiting single mothers...

[–] 93maddie94@lemmy.zip 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It also varies from airport to airport. I get frustrated when I travel because I always get yelled at by TSA agents for following the directions of the previous airport. Some places want all devices out. Some only want laptops. Some want the bag of travel liquids out in their gallon bag. Some allow you to leave them in. But they all act like I’m supposed to know what their particular rules are.

[–] Kiernian@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is based on the TYPE of scanner each checkpoint has and that frequently differs from airport to airport.

The problem is, most of THEM don't even know that, so yeah, you appear mind-bogglingly stupid to them and they look needlessly arcane and possibly deliberately cruel and rude to you.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (5 children)

But... Don't they deal with people from all over the country and world constantly? Ignorance can't be an excuse at that point.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

It's the US, they don't really know about the rest of the world, and apparently a fair number of them aren't sure what New Mexico or DC actually are and whether people from there ought to be arrested or not.

[–] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

This is America. Ignorance is the goal.

[–] OriginalUsername7@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

They're not thinking of it from your point of view, where you've come from any one of thousands of different airports with different rules.

They're thinking of it from their own point of view. Where they've been doing the same thing every day for years, with rules that don't change much if at all, and somehow every single motherfucker that comes through their line gets it wrong.

To be fair, having to repeatedly explain the same fairly simple rules over and over and over again to people who are just not getting it would wear pretty thin fairly quickly. But it's not really the fault of everyone else for not knowing that specific airport's specific rules.

[–] Doxatek@mander.xyz 13 points 21 hours ago

My last airport experience was being stuck in line while the TSA people extremely aggressively screamed at some very elderly Hispanic grandparents who didn't have great English or great hearing for a very long time. They genuinely were trying to do their best.

I get that it's frustrating or whatever but holy shit they do like power tripping stuff too I feel like. The elderly gentleman thought he was supposed to approach to show I.d. but they wanted him to go somewhere else and they treated him like he was going to be an active shooter or something.

[–] glitch1985@lemmy.world 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Everybody lies. Airport XYZ let me keep my fully assembled IED why is it an issue here.

[–] Robust_Mirror@aussie.zone 3 points 19 hours ago

You're right, the literally 1000s of people going through there daily all tell the same lie. I get you need to follow the protocols of your airport regardless of what another one does. But it would be pretty bloody obvious other ones actually are doing things differently.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 56 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A former congressman owned a stake in the company that made the scanners. That's why you go through scanners.

[–] Railing5132@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

Michael Chertoff. Second secretary of the dept of Homeland security. Talk about a conflict of interest.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Chertoff

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 94 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Years ago I had a short inter-country flight in the EU.

Forgot that I still had my swiss army knife in my jacket. Noticed before the scanners. Thought "fuck. oh well, worst case I'll leave it here".

The people at the scanners didn't say a word.

On the way back, I remembered the knife again. Again on front of the scanners.

This time they noticed.

"is that a pocket knife in the jacket?" "uh, damn. yes"

Guy checks out the knife. Hands it back to me "next time put it in the suitcase".

I put it into my jacket and get on the plane.

When we land, I grab my stuff, including the jacket from the overhead compartment.

Sometime taps me on my shoulder, I turn around and see a steward hand me my knife, grinning. It fell out of my jacket when I grabbed it

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Meanwhile, I get my dong dapped up every time I go through.

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I had a lady in Cairo working my breasts like she was taking the lids off jars. Hornk hornk hornk. All behind a curtain so my modesty was protected.

[–] SkaveRat@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Common check to see if you have fake screw-on boobs

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Maybe it happens more than we know in the middle east.

Any screw on boobies have to go in the trays, no exceptions.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lowered_lifted@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I'm old enough to remember flying before all that bullshit and we literally just pulled up to the plane on the tarmac and got on. You could arrive like ten minutes before takeoff. RETVRN

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

I visited the cockpit once on an international flight. JAL Tokyo-London. Just asked if I could, and sure of course.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThinkBeforeYouPost@lemmy.world 124 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

That's what nearly all the intrusion tests and studies have indicated. A big GOP created "make work" program of security theater.

https://www.vox.com/2016/5/17/11687014/tsa-against-airport-security

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

What if a terrorist organization just recruits a straight christian white dude. I doubt TSA would check him too closely.

[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 21 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

Hate to break it to you but straight Christian white dudes are pretty much THE demographic for domestic terrorist

Edit : I am a straight Christian white dude

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 9 points 19 hours ago

I am a straight Christian white dude

We get it you're looking for a job

You have to submit your CV and a cover letter as well as go on our website and fill out 500 little boxes all of which are answered by your CV.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (5 children)

The job of the TSA is not to provide security. Their job is to provide the illusion of security. They are basically living tranquilizers for the public.

[–] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 hours ago

It's also a nationwide jobs program as there almost no requirements to work there. They aren't actual law enforcement.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago

Shortly after the whole high-security thing started there was a UK military officer who had been in charge of counterterrorism somewhere like Belfast, who was an expert in homemade bombs. He said the whole three-ounces of liquid thing was complete bullshit. He knew the specific ingredients they were saying people could potentially mix to make explosives in an airplane restroom, and he said no, these substances would absolutely not blow up a plane or blow a hole in a plane. They had to be combined slowly and carefully, almost drop by drop, in a temperature-controlled vessel, or they would react too fast, creating a violent splash that would merely give the would-be terrorist serious chemical burns.

load more comments
view more: next ›