this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2025
141 points (96.7% liked)

politics

24584 readers
2757 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 5 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

The guy who “finessed” the election for trump now wants to start a new political party…

The trump party can’t call out illegality any elections that this new party may “finesse,” without admitting to taking advantage of that same strategy last year.

This will probably all fail in a completely boring and unsatisfying way, but I’m still hoping for total collapse of both parties.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 2 points 57 minutes ago

Next: petulant billionaire rant threatens to take his ball and go home when nobody wants to join his club in his treehouse with a “No girls” sign over the door.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Amerika Party.

[–] etherphon@midwest.social 6 points 2 hours ago

Ok Ross Perot.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

Lol this man child is so out of touch with the reality that he thinks those who want out of a two party system would vote for a wanna be fascist giving a Nazi salute. He is in for a disappointment.

[–] TempermentalAnomaly@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

Wonder how Andrew Yang is feeling today.

[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

How many of the votes in favour of him creating a new party do we think are just Elon's bots?

[–] notarobot@lemmy.zip 1 points 52 minutes ago

Probably 0. He didn't need to because he asked his fanboys which of course were going to say yes

[–] CorruptCheesecake@lemmy.world 35 points 9 hours ago (4 children)

Elon is so basic. Of course he would use the most generic name imaginable.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 2 points 43 minutes ago

Teddy would never.

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 hour ago

I'm surprised it's not X party.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] vrojak@feddit.org 6 points 2 hours ago

The voters chose Trump after all, I think his assessment is pretty accurate.

[–] Zombiepirate@lemmy.world 36 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

Frankly, I'm a bit surprised he didn't call it the x party.

[–] ajoebyanyothername@lemmy.world 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Could call it American X. Although it needs to sound like it has some background, maybe mention history. American History X, perfect! Only positive associations there.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 39 minutes ago

As someone who hated how whiney and annoying he was in terminator 2, I love that movie for ending with Eddie furlong dying in a urinal.

[–] AFKBRBChocolate@lemmy.ca 5 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

When they said he was forming one, I assumed it would be that

[–] TexasDrunk@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

Xtreme Politics!

[–] sndmn@lemmy.ca 16 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe he's born with it or maybe it's ketamine.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Aww, honey, look. Baby fElon is doing something naive again!

[–] Hideakikarate@sh.itjust.works 21 points 10 hours ago

If we can get more widespread ranked choice voting because of this, that would probably be the best outcome. Second best outcome would be to split the red votes.

[–] hddsx@lemmy.ca 18 points 11 hours ago

I wish it the same success Tesla had in Europe this year.

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 24 points 11 hours ago

The American Party and the Republican Party are fighting for voters. While Polymarket users are betting on who will get the most votes in the elections.

[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 17 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

America party,

remind me what was the name of the nazi American party?

[–] madlian@lemmy.cafe 7 points 10 hours ago

They know nothing!

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The flies are breeding in the carcass.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

Ohhhh so that's where all those damn screwworms were going...

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 3 points 9 hours ago

I'm getting real Clive Palmer vibes from this.

[–] Star@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 8 hours ago

Good time to start a real progressive party maybe, as long as we're already fracturing.