this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
113 points (100.0% liked)

Bay Area

1472 readers
95 users here now

Discussion for all things Bay Area.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ileftreddit@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any time there’s some kind of bullshit like this it’s funded by people with too much free time and too much money. The rest of us are just trying to fucking get by

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

That's the point, unfortunately.

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Was curious what their objection was: https://www.savedowntownmenlo.org/

The city is required by the state to build certain amount of high-density, low-income housing near transit (in this case, Caltrain). The city is proposing using land already owned by them -- three parking lots next to a congested downtown strip.

FWIW, looks like the main objection might be losing those three parking lots than straight up NIMBY.

[–] brotahari@lemmy.world 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/emilyhoeven/article/menlo-park-affordable-housing-20390001.php

"“Hoping to squeeze large apartment buildings into narrow, heavily used downtown parking lots … is not a path to success,” Save Downtown Menlo organizer Alex Beltramo told me in an email. When I pointed out that the Menlo Park City Council has pledged to replace most, if not all, of the 556 parking spaces that would be impacted, Beltramo argued it wouldn’t be sufficient for residents and shoppers and replacing surface lots with parking garages would be “more difficult to navigate and far less convenient.”"

[–] Liz@midwest.social 6 points 18 hours ago

NIMBY always has an excuse. They need to convince fence-sitters they're reasonable. It's still NIMBY.

[–] BigDiction@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago

Helpful context. Was wondering why a local business group would be opposed to 700+ new customers - that’s where a lot of the current customers probably park.

At the same time, this is NIMBYism. The Bay desperately needs housing near transit at scale and it’s brutal to see every single project face this kind of resistance.

I grew up in SJ, lived in SF for 10 years, and moved to Detroit last year. My mom is “concerned” about the larger apartment buildings building up near Meridian and Fruitdale because “people won’t be able to see the mountains behind the big buildings”.

Well congrats mom. You got your spot but I and the other people making under 120k/year won’t be there to enjoy them.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Build on two lots instead and add a multistory parking garage on the third?

[–] Glemek@lemmy.world 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Build on all three, but put 2 levels of parking at each? This seems eminently solvable.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

The plan is probably already to include parking levels, but for the new residents.

[–] john_lemmy@slrpnk.net 16 points 1 day ago

It really screams grassroots movement when you have professionally designed merch

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Save Downtown Menlo (From the poors)

[–] DickFiasco@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

And I wonder why there's a shortage of affordable housing in this country.

[–] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

This "organic" messaging is paid for by the corps. Just watch. 🤔

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago