this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
116 points (100.0% liked)
Bay Area
1474 readers
13 users here now
Discussion for all things Bay Area.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Was curious what their objection was: https://www.savedowntownmenlo.org/
The city is required by the state to build certain amount of high-density, low-income housing near transit (in this case, Caltrain). The city is proposing using land already owned by them -- three parking lots next to a congested downtown strip.
FWIW, looks like the main objection might be losing those three parking lots than straight up NIMBY.
Helpful context. Was wondering why a local business group would be opposed to 700+ new customers - that’s where a lot of the current customers probably park.
At the same time, this is NIMBYism. The Bay desperately needs housing near transit at scale and it’s brutal to see every single project face this kind of resistance.
I grew up in SJ, lived in SF for 10 years, and moved to Detroit last year. My mom is “concerned” about the larger apartment buildings building up near Meridian and Fruitdale because “people won’t be able to see the mountains behind the big buildings”.
Well congrats mom. You got your spot but I and the other people making under 120k/year won’t be there to enjoy them.
NIMBY always has an excuse. They need to convince fence-sitters they're reasonable. It's still NIMBY.
Build on two lots instead and add a multistory parking garage on the third?
Build on all three, but put 2 levels of parking at each? This seems eminently solvable.
The plan is probably already to include parking levels, but for the new residents.
https://www.sfchronicle.com/opinion/emilyhoeven/article/menlo-park-affordable-housing-20390001.php