this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
1386 points (95.5% liked)

Political Memes

8779 readers
2899 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

You're on a bus with 9 people. 1 guy takes up 2/3rds of the bus by himself. 3 people take up 90% of what remains, and the last 5 are stacked on top of each other on the last remaining seat.

The one guy with 2/3 of the bus says he wants to throw two of the other passengers off a cliff at random so he can have their seats. 2 of the 3 in the next segment think this is a terrible idea and say we should keep things as they are, with one voting for it because he thinks somehow everyone will benefit from the top guy having more space. The bottom segment votes 3-2 in favor of the idea, because they hate the people in the second group for taking up space they could use, and like the idea of possibly throwing them off a cliff.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] KingCake_Baby@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

What everyone forgets is that the actual voting already happened. The bus company, Cliff driving Committee, voted before the bus embarked. They voted for the bus driver to drive off the cliff to cut spending to maintenance and health insurance to the driver and bus. There only so much the riders can say at that point

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Pugjesus doesnt seem to understand that you can elect people with a D by their name who will vote with republicans on critical votes. But hey as long as the D team wins on election day, thats all that matters I guess, right Pug?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

I just knew the comments were going to be us tearing each other apart.

I'm just thinking out loud here. What if Progressives that are registered as Democrats changed their registration to independent? Also, stop sending them your money. We could organize it to happen over one week. Then keep it that way for 30 days. See how much power we truly have. If we can show the Democratic party that they would never win another election without us, maybe they would be more likely to listen.

We have to be careful though, I know this President is running roughshod over the Constitution with the blessing of SCOTUS and Congress but they don't have enough votes or State legislatures to amend the Constitution. If they get that, then that truly is the end of this experiment.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

I’m just thinking out loud here. What if Progressives that are registered as Democrats changed their registration to independent? Also, stop sending them your money. We could organize it to happen over one week. Then keep it that way for 30 days. See how much power we truly have. If we can show the Democratic party that they would never win another election without us, maybe they would be more likely to listen.

I mean, honestly, if you manage to coordinate action on that scale, you're probably better off either attempting to take over the Dems or start a third party entirely.

We have to be careful though, I know this President is running roughshod over the Constitution with the blessing of SCOTUS and Congress but they don’t have enough votes or State legislatures to amend the Constitution. If they get that, then that truly is the end of this experiment.

Next election isn't for a year and a half, and there's no guarantee that it'll mean anything. If you want to try anything radical in electoral terms, now's definitely the time to do so. The chances of failure substantially changing our position is... low, unlike previously.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 hours ago

We just saw Progressives not voting for Harris, which lost her the election. The Democrats ignored that.

The good part is that the Democrats have no plan right now. So if anything Progressives should register to primary in better candidates. Also donations, but to individual candidates. This is why New York mattered so much. If Progressives can win, then it is a huge problem for the neoliberals.

[–] Dogyote@slrpnk.net 24 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

Remember, no matter how beautiful, morally righteous, or gratifying your strategy is, you should really look at the results

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] splonglo@lemmy.world 8 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

A vote is not an endorsement, it's a move.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 7 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

"I voted for the cliff because I know the ice cream place is down below it and I wanted to get there faster." - Have to assume this person exists, but I'm not sure who they would be in the analogy. 🤔

Edit: Oh, I just had to scroll down a few more comments to find them.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Amazing how consistently they show up on here.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

MAGA FBI agents on Lemmy discouraging people from voting.

[–] ExhibiCat@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

The problem here is having only two choices.

Where I'm from we have coalition governments. It's very rare for one party to have a majority. So they have to argue for months and come to some kind of agreement with other parties. The good thing is that everyone can vote for what they really want. There's not really any 'lost votes'. The bad thing is that the coalition forming process is messy and slow and the result is much watered down. But I'd much rather have this than a two party system.

If I had been a US citizen I'd have voted for Harris though.

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 8 points 15 hours ago

The problem here is having only two choices.

Yeah, our system is fucked. Unfortunately, we play with the cards we have, not the cards we want.

[–] Coyote_sly@lemmy.world 19 points 20 hours ago

More like two options: one runs the bus off the cliff while the other sets it on fire. Sure, we'll live longer in the fire scenario. Maybe we can even put it out!

But I'm still looking for the fucking exit.

[–] Sibshops@lemmy.myserv.one 24 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

This is kind of a good analogy for ranked choice voting, to be honest.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TuffNutzes@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (4 children)

I bet a lot of people living in Germany in the '30s said "I don't do politics" too. Oops.

[–] nuko147@lemmy.world 6 points 12 hours ago

In Germany the Social Democratic Party (SPD) in the early 1930s prioritized legalistic resistance (e.g speeches, court challenges) over mass mobilization. They rejected general strikes against Hitler even after the Reichstag fire. Also there was No mass uprising when Hitler dismantled civil liberties, the people and the parties had no coordinated strike network.

Guess what happened. Guess whats happening now.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I bet a lot of people living in Germany in the '30s said “I don’t do politics” too.

Thats a wildly ironic statement. The last election held in Germany before the fascist took over was the highest voter turnout in the weimar republics history, over 86%. Theres so many parrellels between the end of the Weimar republic and the US right now, and you are talking about the period of time and the place that maga modeled their 2024 strategy after. And I think you're mistaken about the voters then as you are about voters now.

In the late 20s and early 30s the SDP (social democratic party-- the centrists in Germany) failed to address the rise of the conservatives and in some cases cooperated with them. They were the party who negotiated the treaty of versailles after vanquishing the left shortly before the treaty negotiations, which was disastrous for a lot of industries and created new classes of privilege, and an opening for the conservatives (NSDAP) to whine about money and make a stage show of austerity, just like GOP conservatives have been doing for years in the US. The actual financial burden of the treaty on Germany was manageable-- but unpopular, especially during a global depression when fear ran high.

The SDP dem centrists were seen as corrupt, weak, and indifferent to the struggles of their voters-- much as todays dems are. The SDP were fighting gentelmans games and writing sternly worded letters while the far right NSDAP systematically took power bit by bit. The SDP were fragmented and weak by internal division, and distracted by the center of the party fighting the left (the KDP)-- who were ostensibly allies but disliked each other. Do you see all the parrellels with 2024? I sure do.

Whats different than today is that the left back then were agitating for actual communism, whereas the US progressives today are more like republicans from the early 80s. Today's Progressives are 99.99% capitalists-- barely leftists at all by European standards, and they are just flatly not communists. There's less reason for US dems and the US left to come to blows, but they still do today, like an eternal clockwork. The German KDP were also generally unpopular, and tended to garner only single digit percentages in national votes. Much like today's progressives, but they were needed for centrists to win elections, same as today.

The fascists appealed to a muscular uniparty nationalism after labeling the centrists as weak and corrupt, and the KDP as nuts, especially after just battling the Russians-- exactly like trump is doing. Its not that German people said they "didnt do politics", its that the centrists lost the trust of the voters so enough of them sought the strength of a group that said they were sick of the centrists and leftists ineffective and perceived as corrupt bullshit. The KDP were also hated along with Hitlers NSDAP far right, who each had militia groups of WW1 veterans that took low level actions and intimidations against each other. Picketting, stinkbombs, fights, the occassional murder. I've left out the competing histories of antisemites and zionists, but theres a lot going on there too, although less important to the NSDAP's rise than the economic and trust issues of the parties themselves with the voters. But I will say that the eventual holocaust of Jews and Poles didnt just arise out of nowhere, there was a lot that led to it, some of it related to trade boycotts of all things, and people seldom talk about what politcs and disputes actually led to the murderous hatreds of the holocaust. They prefer george bush-esque "they hate us for our freedoms" or "no one knows why Hitler hated Jews" type of reductive avoidance of any investigation of facts.

So-- same as then-- dont blame the voters. Blame the doddering centrists leadership of then and today. Theres a reason that 85 year old German president Hindenburg who ran as a centrist and then made a deal appointing Hitler chancellor is ridiculed throughout history, same as Biden looks like he will be. A very reduced and dementia ridden Hindenburg died in office one year after appointing Hitler chancellor and was often ridiculed and doubted by voters in all parties, in exactly the same way Biden was/is. After he died Hitler consolidated the presidency with the chancellory and there was then no one to realistically challenge him. You'd think people would learn that trusting 86 year presidents like idiot Paul von Hindenburg -- Or Biden-- or trump to run a country doesn't work out well for the voters.

[–] Saleh@feddit.org 0 points 7 hours ago

Actually the turnout was the highest in that time and the conservative centrists and "progressive" centrists made sure to demobilize people and hand power to the Nazis.

[–] misteloct@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 12 hours ago

They also said "we didn't know", 2000 feet downwind of a human oven factory. "And if we did what could we have done?". Those people are still alive and they're not a small minority of even our country.

[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

FPTP is the real winner here. It's why we have Trump. Why can't we vote for proportional representatives or ranked choice?

[–] Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I believe there are three reasons our broken two party system stagnates and rots:

  1. Our slavery founders intended for our system to be a plutocratic republic that would resist change, not a democracy

  2. The purpose of every state is to maintain order which requires preserving itself

  3. Fixing our system would require our politicians to vote against their own interests, to risk their own power and status... This goes against every ideal that capitalists believe in. Capitalists believe that as long as they follow the rules, they are entitled to everything they can take. The fact that the rules were written by the rich to favor the rich is of no concern to them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trillnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 7 points 18 hours ago

im sure the illogical thinkers will start thinking logically any day now

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

Also

I only voted to drive off of a cliff as a joke. I wanted to trigger those sweet tooth ice cream eaters. I didn't want to die.

Someone told me about people, who regretted eating ice cream. What if you are allergic to milk, amd die from eating ice cream? What if ice cream is a recent creation by to make children and adults addicted to ice cream, to the rest of their lives? Driving off from a cliff is therefore preferable to ice cream, and someone told me only ice cream eaters will die in a fire.

[–] wpb@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

The "drive off the cliff" party vs the "drive off the cliff, but ever so slightly slower and also we'll wave some rainbow flags I guess" party. I know who I'm voting for!

[–] Grapho@lemmy.ml 6 points 19 hours ago

Also, I'm installing a bigger motor so you have a reason not to vote for the other party, because they'd get to go even faster

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›