this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
213 points (98.6% liked)

World News

48116 readers
2154 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi told the European Union’s top diplomat that Beijing can’t accept Russia losing its war against Ukraine as this could allow the United States to turn its full attention to China, an official briefed on the talks said, contradicting Beijing’s public position of neutrality in the conflict.

The admission came during what the official said was a four-hour meeting with EU foreign affairs chief Kaja Kallas on Wednesday in Brussels that “featured tough but respectful exchanges, covering a broad range of issues from cyber security, rare earths to trade imbalances, Taiwan and Middle East.”

The official said Wang’s private remarks suggested Beijing might prefer a protracted war in Ukraine that keeps the United States from focusing on its rivalry with China. They echo concerns of critics of China’s policy that Beijing has geopolitically much more at stake in the Ukrainian conflict than its admitted position of neutrality.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] card797@champserver.net 2 points 1 hour ago

Europe had better figure that shit out. It's only gonna get worse without concrete steps to force an end to the conflict. They should vote on Ukraine EU entry and send in their own troops if affirmative.

[–] ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip 72 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

This flavor of candid admittance from a diplomat is not something I'm used to. I like it.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 hours ago

If this information is true and the Chinese officials weren't bullshitting, then leaking this doesn't sound like a good move on the European official end.

[–] Blackout@fedia.io 44 points 22 hours ago

The whole world is terrorized by assholes

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 50 points 22 hours ago (5 children)

Out of all the reasons China needs Russia to win this is the most bullshit one they could serve us. They are sided with Putin, supply him with military equipment and help him get around sanctions for oil. They need Putin's war economy to work so they can replicate it in South East Asia obviously.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Doesn't their economy have a way bigger production capacity than Russia's? Why would they want to replicate Russia's? China seems much more successful at manufacturing at scale.

[–] mgnome@piefed.social 29 points 22 hours ago

Taco Don already functionally stopped all aid and arms supply to Ukraine and trying his hardest to ignore Ukraine, and will probably chicken out from helping Taiwan defend itself too in case latter gets invaded.

So that's just China being asshole too and wanting Russia to succeed, because that'd mean you can take a dump on international laws and have benefits that outweigh repercussions.

If whatever remains of free democratic world won't get its shit together soon - we will just get picked apart eventually by those last iteration imperialists.

[–] Xanthobilly@lemmy.world 15 points 21 hours ago

Yah, if anything, this is even more reason Russia must not win, it can cripple China too.

[–] Ilovethebomb@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

Until now, the fact that the rest of the civilised world would wreck their economy through sanctions has stopped them doing that.

[–] Joncash2@lemmy.ml -5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Kallas, the person sitting across the table literally said a few months ago that the EU will turn on China after taking care of Russia. Wang Yi is just saying USA because the US is even more blatant. Why, if you were China would you let Russia lose if everyone on the other side of that table keeps saying they're going after you once Russia is done?

[–] ManixT@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Because fucking human lives are at stake? Should the US have allowed the Japanese conquest of China to continue because they felt like it?

No one is "going after" China. They want to murder Taiwanese people and steal their land. Just like the Russians in Ukraine.

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 31 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

They arent wrong in the sense that we need something to occupy Trumps attention with that doesnt cause too much damage. Problem is, the Ukraine war causes a bunch of fucking damage...

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 13 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

People tend to forget how afraid China is of USA. Last time Trump was in office Milley had to call China a couple of times to tell them USA was not going to implode and attack China.

Someone has to make hard decisions when other people won't make sane decisions. No one wants Trump to start WW3 with China. No one.

Remember what just happened when China hit the off switch on rare earth metals?

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 1 points 19 hours ago

Trump might want this

[–] Reverendender@sh.itjust.works 10 points 19 hours ago
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 19 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The deeper implications of this are... frightening, to say the least.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

The US has been the biggest long term enemy to the working populations of the world since the end of the WWII, including its own. Throw a pin on the map, and you're likely to hit a place that's been affected by a war started or fought by the US, or a place where the US has had a hand in destroying worker power in order to for American business to extract resources and labour for cheap, or a sanctioned place where working people are made to suffer in order to overthrow their government, or a combination thereof.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml -4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Russia will not cut off China especially with the western sanctions. That would be russia cutting off their nose to spite their face.

It seems China is hoping to weaken us imperialism and it would make sense they would wanna see a Russian Victory. That directly weaken US force projection and put a us proxy on its backfoot.

Edit:

Lots of conjecture yet no sources China really wants the US stable. I really don't think so.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

China wants USA stable and sane. Weak or strong USA isn't a priority right now.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Uh I don't think so. I think China wants to see the us position significantly weakened.

Why on earth do they want a stable Us?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 3 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

They probably want a stable and declining US rather than a bunch of fascists crashing the world economy.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Given that China has the world's seconds largest economy and they are trying to break into all of the foreign markets the US is currently in I don't think they care.

I'm sure some of them care about their portfolio but that's going to look great under Trump.

I think for them if the US goes full fascist it's a win-win.

As long as we're focused on our own internal politics and not messing with China or trying to disable their economy I really really don't think they care.

Edit: Do you guys at least have a source on this claim that China wants a stable us?

[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

But that's my point, if the US went full fascist, it would not stop and think only about its internal politics. Trump's stated goal is to pull the US out of all its entanglements and responsibilities and turn its full attention towards China and mess with it.

And I don't think Trump is good for portfolios either. It might be good for the portfolio of Trump and some other people, but even the average Wall Street guy is losing out. See TACO.

[–] dastanktal@lemmy.ml 0 points 16 hours ago

Right but they would still have time to respond on top of that it's not like the US is very close to China. And even if we did send her aircraft carriers in to go mess with China that would be a really hard fight for the United states. I don't think it would go well.

On top of the fact that China really wants the US position in the world to be weak. It would be very beneficial for China to be the strongest and take over that title because it sure as shit isn't going to Russia right now