this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
512 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24584 readers
2805 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

What the senator claimed was a difficult decision was just a case of backroom deals and abandoned principles.

When the Republican-controlled Senate passed the disastrous megabill on Tuesday, the deciding vote came from Sen. Lisa Murkowski. The Alaskan lawmaker, who has long claimed to be a moderate, got over the finish line the bill for Donald Trump’s priorities, which would send billions of dollars to ICE, extend tax cuts for the wealthy, kick large abortion providers out of the Medicaid program, and knock millions of low-income people off their health insurance.

Murkowski cast this vote just a week after she suggested in a podcast interview that she’d consider becoming an independent and caucusing with Senate Democrats. She cast this vote, which could shutter nearly 200 Planned Parenthood clinics, after repeatedly painting herself as “pro choice.” She cast this vote after Planned Parenthood called the bill a “backdoor abortion ban” and said it could eliminate one in four abortion providers nationwide.

As Bolts Magazine Editor-in-Chief Daniel Nichanian noted after the vote: “The Senate’s small-state ultra-bias is never more maddening than when one senator uses it to get benefits for her 740,000 constituents while openly acknowledging the bill she’s supporting will harm the nation’s 339 million other residents.”

top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fittedsyllabi@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

This is the problem with having old people decide on things. Anybody who has a grandmother or grandfather knows how many mistakes they make in a single day.

[–] burgerpocalyse@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

did you see her dead eyed rage directed at a reporter who dared ask her why she did it https://youtu.be/0uQMNRpjQ-A

[–] JuBe@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

(Go to 4:28.)

[–] johncandy1812@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 day ago

Her defiant reaction to the backlash was the worst part of it. She refuses to acknowledge people's ire. She ends up making the case that she did it for Alaskans at the expense of the rest of her country. That she knew it was wrong but didn't mind throwing everyone else under the bus.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 52 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Lisa fight

I’d like to say that Alaska will vote her out but Alaska isn’t known for being progressive or sane. People come here to hoard broken cars & ripped tarps in peace.

People come here to hoard broken cars & ripped tarps

Not to mention the enormous, life-changing $1700 per year of oil money everybody gets.

[–] keys42@literature.cafe 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Murkowski was literally primaried by a further right nut job, ran in the general as a write in, won and rejoined the Republicans. The only thing that will stop Alaskans electing her is death or retirement.

[–] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Well she hasn't had an election since RCV started, so hopefully we get a better Senator

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We're at the point that I'm not sure if this is an onion.

*nibble nibble*

Edit several hours later: oh shit this is not an onion. FML.

[–] Liberal_Ghost@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

As a former resident of Alaska I say that, yes that is true.

[–] RejZoR@lemmy.ml 79 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Have you seen the fucks cheering after it passed? Imagine knowing you're fucking over 15+ million people just so you can get a tax break. Disgusting as fuck.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago

Did you see them laughing while voting down the Democrats’ amendments? Straight up sociopathic.

[–] ReallyAngryNerd@europe.pub 92 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

She cares more about her career than about all the people that will die as a result of her vote. Edit: Just like all the others who voted for this btw.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 43 points 2 days ago

Not all of them, plenty of them voted for it because of the people it will harm as a result.

[–] BeNotAfraid@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Alaska got an exemption from Medicaid Cuts. I imagine her rationale was that she was protecting her constituents. Fucked everyone else though.

[–] tburkhol@lemmy.world 37 points 1 day ago

All she had to do was say 'no,' and she could have protected her constituents and 330,000,000 other Americans.

[–] mysticpickle@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 day ago

The "I got mine. Fuck you" mindset is pretty on brand for Republicans

[–] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Yeah but her constituents still have to deal with all the other shit in the bill too so it's not like she really did them any favors.

[–] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago

I guarantee she has a nice cushy lobbyist position lined up for Big Oil after pushing that bill through. She could give two shits about reelection with that fallback.

[–] Tiger@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 days ago

She’s a piece of shit.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Remember when republicans would harp on Grover Norquists Taxpayer protection pledge about swearing theyd never raise any taxes? Yeah way back in the old before times, like 2024. You never hear about that anymore.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

I don't want all this responsibility, I just wanted respect and a nice house. Why are these problems mine to deal with?!

[–] Wytch@lemmy.zip 10 points 2 days ago

These people shouldn't be elected, they should be studied. In a lab.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 7 points 1 day ago

Fuck that cunt!