this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
818 points (95.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

8385 readers
2721 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JamesTBagg@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You can go buy those old washing machines. They're still out there. I got my washer and dryer used for 100 dollars each.

Nothing digital on them, all analog. Fixed a washer overflowing issue by replacing the $20 pressure level switch. Twice I've had to replace the heating element for the dryer, $20 bucks for those. Everything is replaceable with a flat head screwdriver and a youtube video.

Go buy those old washers and dryers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago (6 children)

If it's a side-loading washer, you're not supposed to close the door all the way when it isn't in use. That's why it smelled.

[–] 1D10@lemmy.world 8 points 23 hours ago

Pretty sure this is true for all modern washers, ours is top load and it says leave door open when not in use.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Your parents washing machine also cost more because it was made better. The best price I could find for a standard washing machine in 1980 was $289. To put that into perspective, according to CPI inflation that is the equivalent of about $1,100 today. As a proportion of median individual income, that's like $1,550 today. You can still buy a Speed Queen washer for consumers that costs $1,500 and will last a long time, but people largely don't because the shitty one costs less than half of that.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This the argument I have with clients on a daily basis, in regards to all kinds of manufactured goods. People are astoundingly awful at understanding and visualizing inflation and the value of a dollar over time, even people who are specifically educated on this point and even work with it as part of their jobs. Everyone has some threshold beyond which they absolutely won't countenance paying more than $X for Y, but this is always arbitrary and whenever the course of events drives the median price of whatever-it-is past that line they lose their minds.

Durable goods manufacturing is a race to the bottom because it has to be in order to overcome everyone's moronic preconceptions about what a product "ought" to cost. This isn't just a capitalist greed thing, although it's certainly that, too -- corners have to be cut, panels have to be made thinner, it has to contain more plastic and less metal, because otherwise it'll never be cheap enough for 99% of the population to agree to buy it and even then they'll all still bitch about how shoddily made it is. Year over year every manufacturer has to figure out how to make it cheaper to slide under MSRP. The manufacturers who take the opposite strategy inevitably wind up as niche players, because as much as people spout that they'd happily pay more for a better built thing, the flat out truth is they're all full of shit and to the nearest decimal point, none of them actually will if given the opportunity.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is it is rarely an easy proposition to just "pay more and get a better product" especially when it comes to home appliances.

In most big box stores every option will be shit. Companies know that there are consumers at every price point and so they have a product for every price print.

The problem is the expensive isn't really better, it's the same fridge with the same compressor as a cheap one except it has a wifi dongle or a tablet in the door.

Of course there are the Vikings and Thermidors and whatever but those are Velben goods that priced so high that you could get 5 to 10 of the cheap options for the price of one.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] mavu@discuss.tchncs.de 68 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You know the funny thing?

You can still buy appliances that last and have good service.

But you don't earn enough to afford them, like your parents did.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (5 children)

This is not the case. Washers used to be more expensive as a proportion of median income back then. According to this page a new Kenmore washer cost $289 in 1980. The median family income in 1980 was $21,023, so a new washer would cost 1.37% of a family's annual income. Compare to now, where the median household income is $83,150. As a proportion of median income, a $289 washer in 1980 would cost about $1500 today, which is about what a durable, well made washer with a 7 year warranty costs. Manufactured goods were largely more expensive compared to wages in the past.

[–] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 5 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Median income isnt the whole story as rent, transportation, medical, and other costs have increased at a greater rate so people dont have the money to buy the 1500 dollar washing machine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] notoftenthat@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boots_theory applies...

A Speed Queen set sure would be nice to have.

[–] decipher_jeanne@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Meh. Buy them second hand. Not even joking. As you said, good one last forever. while there's a bit of a logistics difficulty with second hand large appliances, you can also just rent a van for the day and ask a friend for help.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrEff@lemmy.world 25 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I want to start an appliance company that offers 10 year warranties with an additional 5 year replaceable parts availability promise. The designs will be simple, functionality simple with minimal quality of life improvements, and all repair manuals will be published on the website along with tutorial videos, while also banking on building a product that simply lasts longer.

I'm willing to bet that if that is what you advertise on, the longevity of the product at a minimal price, then the company should do fine.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You won't. You'll get annihilated by the next Chinese competitor who produces a piece of shit machine that breaks in 13 months like clockwork (and has a 12 month warranty), but sells for 1/2 or 2/3 of the price of your machine.

The average consumer is dogshit at conceptualizing the actual value of a product over its lifetime in proportion to its cost. They'll just see that the next machine on display at Best Buy or whatever looks modern and costs less to buy up front, and then they'll buy that one. When it breaks they'll bitch and moan on Facebook and Nextdoor and write ranty one star reviews everywhere, and then wheel right back to Best Buy and buy another machine just like it.

[–] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 day ago

At the end of the day these are commodity items. It's reasonable for consumers to buy whatever's cheapest from a reputable physical store and expect at least decent reliability.

The solution can't come from a manufacturer making a better product, because of the information asymmetry; the average consumer just can't be expected to spend hours researching every commodity item.

The solution has to be targeted legislative action with a clear goal of measurably improving the overall reliability of those commodities. Unfortunately lobbyists hate that because more reliability = less margin and fewer sales, and consumers don't often love it either because this kind of legislation directly translates to inflated prices (at least in the short term). There are still people bitching that you can't buy incandescent lightbulbs anymore... So regulators would rather play dead and hope nobody notices they are doing fuck-all.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AWistfulNihilist@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

This was unironically Maytag, they enshitified with the rest. The Maytag man was a real thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] duckCityComplex@lemmy.world 46 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Similar story for clothes dryers:

My parents' dryer had 2 knobs for temperature and run time, and a start button. Ran forever and dried clothes.

My dryer has like a dozen programmed cycles that rely on a moisture sensor that doesn't work and leaves clothes damp unless you use the manual time & temp settings, which takes several capacitive button presses on a circuit board that is likely to die before any of the actual mechanical components of the dryer. Also for some reason it has Wi-Fi.

[–] msage@programming.dev 2 points 16 hours ago

Wifi is there to avoid pressing the capacitive buttons.

[–] Idontevenknowanymore@mander.xyz 34 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"And for some reason it has Wi-Fi ." will be the last line in humanity's epitaph.

[–] exasperation@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago

The latest xkcd has one of my favorite hover texts of all time:

It's important for devices to have internet connectivity so the manufacturer can patch remote exploits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] silentbob@literature.cafe 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Why are appliances shit nowadays >:( i bought a house with 20-30 year old appliances that work fine, but decided to start upgrading so I bought a new washer and dryer. The new machines dont work nearly as well and I know they're not going to last even 10 years. We're already having issues with them 4 months later.

[–] tempest@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • they are often "cheaper" then what you would have paid in the 80s and they are built to that price
  • they are more efficient, which means every thing has tighter tolerances and thus more likely to break
  • they are more complicated due to the above which means more to break
  • with the above efficiently they use way less water but in my experience that means they clean worse
[–] LoreleiSankTheShip@lemmy.ml 2 points 17 hours ago

And also planned obsolescence

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 130 points 1 day ago (3 children)

You always have to leave the door open...

[–] HornedMeatBeast@lemmy.world 83 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I picked this up from my parents.

When I moved out, I lived with a flatmate for a few years and I left the washing machine door open after using it and my flatmate closed it.

I explained to her why I left it open and she just stared back at me. Not once had she ever thought of this and said it made so much sense. She is about 20 years my senior.

Certain habits seem to be so obvious, but unless handed down, someone may never even think of it.

Reminds me of that guy that never thought to let the shower water get warm before stepping in.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qx128@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago

Should’a bought a Speed Queen

[–] Distropia@endlesstalk.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

At least it's Wi-Fi connected.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I've repaired a few dryers, the new ones have the same aluminium drum like you would expect but for some godforsaken reason they're allowed to mount that drum in place on a plastic ring. The dial components and thermostats used to safely operate the heating elements are also much smaller, which is problematic given that gives them less capacitance for high voltage and heat causing them to fail easier.

But worst of all is that when they fail, not if but when, you can't just take the dial off and file the corrosion off the metal contacts, you have to order an entirely new board completely if they offer it at all. You can't just open the top and front panel with a few screws to take the drum out and do repairs, you have to unscrew every panel in order and detatch them from the additional internal chassis, and you're gonna need like 7 fucking arms to put the damn thing back together.

If I were in charge, these sort of blatant obsolences would be punishable with extradition and federal prison.

[–] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Spend a little more and get yourself a speed queen top loader and never replace it again.

But also … my Maytag (same brand as my parents that came with the house that was built in 82) high efficiency front loader has been reliable af too.

Just don’t get a washer from a brand that is just a tech brand that now makes washers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] glimse@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is like that fridge post from yesterday..

The difference is that...cheap washing machines didn't exist. Good modern washing machines last a long time while not wasting money and electricity.

You can't compare the only available appliances of the 70s to the bottom-of-the-barrel now

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (8 children)

No. That's not what's happening here.

And just for the record I am an appliance repair tech for the last 20 years.

Hands down appliances from the early 90s to about the 2010s are significantly better than new appliances today.

They are better in everyway. They were made under a different philosophy, they were made to be fixed.

When I stated my career in 2004 I would have a box of common parts that would break for each kind of appliance I would service. Fridge, washer, dryer ext. I wouldn't have to order a part for weeks. I would just drive down to the parts supplier stock up and move on to my next work order. Now all I do is order proprietary parts that are dedicated to one specific model number.

The materials and build quality of older appliances far exceeds that of new ones so much so that I am actually recommending to my clients that they try to find a used appliance rather than buy a new one because it'll probably last longer.

And I've had this argument so many times already on this platform the savings on energy are absolutely negligible. They can easily be ignored. To clarify the way they notate change in energy is by percentages so it'll appear that an appliance is saving 70% more energy but in reality that saving is stretched across 365 days which equates to maybe 25 to 30 cents of savings a day. Or it'll look like you're saving 400 kilowatt hours but again stretched across 365 days that's just over 1 kilowatt hour a day.

The only caveat is the fact that washers use less water which can actually turn into some kind of savings over the course of the year because your water heater will have to heat less water but that's about it.

Generally I fix appliances that are less than 10 years old most of those are refrigerators the extreme vast majority of those are Samsung appliances.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] LaunchesKayaks@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm so thankful my house came with a super old washer and dryer. They work so well. I had to replace the one vent hose thing for the dryer, but that's because my cat thought she could sit on it and it ripped out of the wall when she landed on it.

[–] 1D10@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

I'm not saying it is the case in your situation but sometimes very old appliances are so inefficient that it makes sense to replace them on energy savings alone, we had a fridge that I put a meter on to see what it cost us to run, it was a little over $100 more per year then the larger one I was thinking of buying So if this new one lasts 10 years or so it will have paid for itself.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›