this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2025
877 points (95.7% liked)

Political Memes

8745 readers
2899 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 14 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

poor kirsten :(, Only 2.5K away from a million. she must be so devo /s

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

yeah the kind that makes you publicly racist.

seriously i hope literally every single one of her constituents is calling her daily to resign. unbelievable how she was straight up KKK posting on that radio interview.

[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 34 minutes ago

yup. I was jk. I know she's a piece of shit.

[–] boaratio@lemmy.world 12 points 18 hours ago

New York resident here. Hakeem Jeffries has always sucked. As does Kathy Hochul. Complete garbage.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 6 points 16 hours ago

Not projection, just a flat out lie.

[–] LMurch@thelemmy.club 1 points 11 hours ago

Ah, Dan Goldman, why?? Damn it.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Ah, but if you said anything against the blue (but not in favor of red), you were the vile, evil... CENTRIST! (I.e. a label just applied to you to single you out for not blindly agreeing with the zeitgeist.) Seriously, the front page of Lemmy for a good while was just toxic political "VOTE BLUE NO MATTER WHO" and if you didn't agree, you were just a problem.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 13 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

The critical part of 'vote blue no matter who' is the voting part. That's the game plan short-term when it's election season.

That does not preclude criticizing the incumbents. Or even the candidates. But no matter how you feel about them, you vote for them to stave off misery, and encourage everyone around you to do the same.

Not voting for them sends a message, but it's the wrong message - and that message is that the populace prefers the GOP. Stop fascism in its tracks and vote blue. Fight for actual progress by doing what you can to forward actual progressive candidates and policies. Like NYC is doing right now.

It boggles my mind how people seem to be incapable of wrapping their head around that concept, and instead continue to insist that we shouldn't be voting for DNC candidates because


uh - it'll make things better??? Somehow??? At this point, the willful ignorance is starting to smack of sealioning.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Not voting for them sends a message, but it’s the wrong message - and that message is that the populace prefers the GOP

Hard disagree on that. That's assuming the intentions of the people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_are_either_with_us,_or_against_us

If you're argument is that we need to be doing what's right and pushing for progress, then why is that cast as something ONLY the "blue" can do? I don't know how old you are to see how many times the "blue" has absolutely failed at their job, failed the people, but for no other reason than they're in the right party, they keep getting voted in. But I've seen several "blue" presidents do anywhere from fuckall to the bare minimum in terms of progress/change.

There are other options to vote for that don't just include the GOP as you seem to suggest. The US isn't supposed to be just a 2 party system. It's supposed to be dynamic; these parties are supposed to die off when they no longer represent the people. If you want progress and change, but keep doing the same thing that doesn't seem to be all that progressive.... are you making any progress?

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 2 points 11 hours ago

Hard disagree on that. That’s assuming the intentions of the people.

No it's not. It's acknowledging the fact that campaigning politicians largely view people as one of the following:

  • With us
  • Against us
  • Someone we might be able to persuade to be with us
  • Not relevant

If you don't vote, they categorise you in that last one. It doesn't matter what's in your heart, what matters is how they perceive you. The only tool you have to change that is your vote.

[–] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

I don't know if you've been watching the current political climate in the USA, but 'anywhere from fuckall to the bare minimum' is drastically, ridiculously, absurdly better than what the GOP is doing when they are in power - and when first-past-the-post is the only voting method, and elections are as tight as they are, you can whinge all you want about the morality of voting for someone who doesn't actually represent your interests, but not voting blue helps the GOP win.

The system is broken, yes, but harm reduction is the name of the game when it's the only choice you are given.

Save the moralizing for primaries and local races. We've seen what happens when people withhold their vote, and what happens is fascism.

[–] smrtprts@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

FPTP voting results in 2 parties unfortunately. until the system changes, voting 3rd party does fuck all.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This this this this this.

I keep saying this refrain. The time to reform the party is after elections, until the primary (NOW). The time to vote for the party is during the election period. Sure, state your grievances anytime or all the time to get your politicians to listen. But handing the win to chaos to state your case gives the way to fascism.

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Not terribly helpful when the party just ignores us until the election when it's "too late."

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 3 points 14 hours ago

Well Mamdani is a sign that they (billionaires and establishment politicians) aren't just ignoring progressives (if that's what you mean by us), they are actively campaigning against reform, we are pushing back. I know it can feel helpless, but don't just assume nothing is happening.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

In the general election, that's what you should do. If establishment Dems don't back their nominee, it doesn't change how you should vote.

People who didn't vote blue in 2024 actively chose a fascist regime. Anyone who doesn't vote blue in all the upcoming elections (with a Fetterman exception, but he should be primaried) is endorsing the MAGA movement.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Hard disagree. If we continue the narrative that the US is a 2 party system, actively rejecting and backing other parties in fear "the bad guy will win" (a sentiment and view shared with the Dem/Rep parties), then we've entered a endless loop that only as we've seen over the decades, is a race to the bottom. We elected Biden because we didn't want Trump and largely for no other reason. That's not a good reason. And Biden even commented that he was perhaps too old (his words).

And it's a fallacy, shared by the Dem/Rep, to fear-monger the "If you don't vote for MY party, then it's voting for the other party (the bad guys)". This was a false narrative that was spread this election and several before it, to prevent anyone else from opposing the status quo. A vote for 'not my party' is not a 'vote for the other party'. If I can't vote how I want (speaking broadly here for everyone), then my vote doesn't matter. And if my vote doesn't matter, then I'm not being represented. And if you're going to argue that, I'd like to point to the huge number of eligible voters who consistently don't vote. If we cast non-votes as a vote of no confidence, we'd see a big change in things. But doing that means Dem/Rep would lose the seesaw swings in power they have come to enjoy.

So no, you shouldn't just throw your vote blindly behind any side. Especially because the internet thinks you should (and again, that goes for Dem/Rep alike).

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

When the major party candidates include a literal fascist building concentration camps and sending people to torture prisons without due process and a wildly imperfect opposition party candidate, you for against the literal fascist.

People who chose not to vote for Harris because they weren't "excited" to vote for her chose not to stand in the way of Trump, and they are responsible for him winning the election.

If you didn't vote for Harris, you have blood on your hands and should be losing sleep over it.

[–] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I voted libertarian in the last election. Not because I thought they had any chance of winning, but because neither party had a candidate I would like to endorse and instead of not voting I gave it to the libertarians to help them stay over the threshold for the next election.

The two party system is going to be the death of America.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

You voted for Trump, and you have blood on your hands.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

Only if they're in a swing state. If they in a safe blue or safe red state, eh, have at it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] vxx@lemmy.world 75 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

With the current political climate USA is in, it might weaken him to get endorsements from the establishment.

Their masks are coming off. Voting in line with republicans and being vocal against anything progressive.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 day ago (8 children)

I was thinking the other day after NPR mentioned Elon's recent spat that he could fund other candidates in mid terms. If he endorsed Democrats that might do more harm than good lol.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

For sure. I would immediately be sceptical of any candidate, even progressives, if Elon endorsed them.

We'd end up with another Fetterman.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 138 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Huge correlation with AIPAC being their top donors, fyi.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] deddit@lemmy.world 68 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (16 children)

Okay, just hear me out for a second.... I completely agree they should endorse him, but rather than just saying they are irreverent (though this may actually be the case) I would like to know in clear and concise terms WHY they are waiting/failing to endorse the man whom was chosen by the people. I think knowing why they won't endorse him is very relevant to the discussion. Eith

TLDR; their silence is very telling.

[–] wheezy@lemmy.ml 3 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Honestly, I don't want their endorsement. Fuck em. This party is getting taken over by the left or we're burning it down.

I think they see the inevitable rise of fascism and don't want to get grabbed by Trump's brown shirts. They're liberals that are being scratched and looking for a safe place in the future.

They didn't even do their typical. "Oh we're against the bombing of Iran but because he didn't go through Congress". I literally was waiting to roll my eyes at all their liberal "following procedure for our war crimes" but they even stayed quiet about it mostly.

We had two parties. Fascist and Liberals. Now we just have fascist and Liberals looking for a safe place in the new power structures. They're kind of confused I think. A little caught off guard with how much Trump is following through on actual policy. They're use to both parties lying and giving working class dollars to the rich. The conservatives are no longer playing the game of politics they all use to love that got nothing done.

Fuck the party leaders and most of these shits in Washington. They have no place now. We don't need their endorsement.

We can win with the momentum. We don't need to win power back through votes. We just need to give this countries people enough hope to build class consciousness. Decades can happen it weeks.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (14 children)

I don't know about the rest of them, though I certainly have my suspicions, but with gillibrand it's very clearly just racism. That interview she gave was extremely telling.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If you primary these establishment fucks out you don't have this problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

It's always been the same fear mongering strategy dems and Repubs have always used. Today it's just very effective.

[–] blargh513@sh.itjust.works 80 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Why the fuck is schumer still in office?! Hes the very definition of a dickless, useless democrat. Fuck that guy, just get lost useless boomer, let someone who gives a shit take the seat.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 day ago

VBNMW was always "we want to give you a shitty candidate, you'll vote for it and you'll like it."

load more comments
view more: next ›