this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2025
343 points (99.4% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

6834 readers
1281 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Whaaaaat...?

The party who put a coal lobbyist in charge of the EPA for Trump's entire previous term did this...?

Nooooo.

/sarcasm

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (45 children)

This is what you voted for protest-non-voters.

[–] torch_and_blanket@sopuli.xyz 3 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

Oh, no doubt, but a worse foe lurks! Some people voted for Donald Trump.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Protest non-voters accounted for maybe 800k, while RFK accounted for 1.3m.

But sure, let's keep blaming voters instead of the Democrats that chose to represent Republican Lite™.

[–] seejur@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

Republican lite at this moment sounds a lot more refreshing than Republican nazi

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

No shit. Trump whispered sweet nothings to those outside his MAGAt base by appealing to affordability and peace. Since then, he's followed through on exactly none of that.

In the past, people like Obama at least lied to Americans about what they would deliver as president, while shortly thereafter doing the same as Trump. Democrats in 2024 couldn't even lie their faces off by speaking to the same points as Trump. Well, Kamala did after first when she brought Walz on board, but that quickly changed come the DNC where she said she wouldn't diverge one bit from Biden.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

I'm informing protest-non-voters what they actually voted for.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Ok, so protest non-voters accounted for 800k of the non-voting population in 2024.

Want to know how many didn't vote not because of protesting?

About 36% of eligible Americans didn't vote either D, R, or 3rd party in 2024. That's about 120 million Americans. 800k is less than 1% of 120mn.

You know these numbers, and you're still telling me that the protest non-voters were the issue: not that Democrats lost 8 million voters between 2020 and 2024?

Why do you think Democrats both failed to capture more voters despite the eligible voting population increasing from 2020 to 2024, and hemorrhaged their already existing base?

I'll wait for you to draw the conclusion that best suits your liberal comforts.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

How do you know how many people who didn't vote did so because of protest?

6 MILLION MORE PEOPLE voted for Biden than Harris. That's a lot of people who just magically disappeared for reasons other than protest by your count. They weren't just undecided swing voters, either, because Trump's votes barely changed at all between 2020 and 2024.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

You sure are assigning a lot of stuff to me. I am informing protest non-voters what they actually voted for.

[–] Resonosity@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Protest non-voters, if all aligning with Kamala, would not have made a difference in the 2024 election.

You informing them does as much good as informing the entire eligible non-voting population. 800k vs 120mn.

There is no need to draw attention to their movement here unless you also take issue with the larger voting block.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago

Boy more. Don't worry I'm informing protest-non-voters what they voted for for another 3.5 years. Ciao.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 6 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I totally feel this frustration, and I'm not US so it's kinda not my business, but I don't buy this argument.

Trump America is a horror show, for sure. But the status quo before Trump is also the foundations that allowed America to become a new facist state. Any real solutions need to be bigger than what middle of the road Democrats are offering.

That doesn't mean you shouldn't vote against Trump. But the system is clearly broken, stop blaming victims of it, and start blaming its perpetrators.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 9 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (2 children)

Status quo of Biden implementing Green energy, EVs, build back better, PACT act, chips act, student debt relief, Obama's healthcare. And you're equating this to .... status quo.... , and .... a foundation of a fascist state. ........

[–] DrunkEngineer@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Biden's "green" Infrastructure Plan is increasing carbon emissions though.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Green energy and infrastructure are two separate things. That you have to hammer them together to make a bad faith argument is telling.

In addition, it could potentially even undo some of the emissions reductions

Could. Potentially. And if you read how they did their figuring yeah it's no surprise they keep inserting words like "could". Then certain people read it and think that means "is".

But in any case green energy and infrastructure are two separate things.

And back to this post, what's Trump doing? Line item is Zero.

[–] houseofleft@slrpnk.net 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I'm 100% not equating Biden with Trump. I'm not trying to deny the comolete horror Trump is afflicting of US and non-US citizens right now.

I'm just saying, he's a symptom of a broken system. America will only come out of this situation if it recognises that it needs to make real and lasting change.

The non voters might not help, but they're at least acknowledging this reality. And putting them in the same camp as literal facists is not helping anyone.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

I'm not saying that you're equating Biden with Trump. I listing off all the accomplishments of the Dems that you are bizarrely trying to call status quo and whatever gymnastics to cram it into "foundations of fascism" something system.

And you are continuing to try to do this. The Dems were making "real" changes to improve society. But you're still trying whatever this mental gymnastics is.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 12 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Ha ha but You voted for Genocide!

/s

[–] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (5 children)

So did the protest non-voters, even moreso than the Democrat ones.

The non-genocide position was literally impossible to express no matter what you tried to do.

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

No it existed. Harris is on record saying she'd like to work towards peace talks.

Which is objectively better than option B: vote GOP "finish them off" and option C: literally doing nothing.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Okay, fine: to the extent that a non-genocide position existed, Harris was it.

But the real point is that even if a person disagrees with you about that, they still should've voted for Harris. She was at least objectively not more genocidal than Trump, and infinitely better on basically every other issue.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

But at least we didn't help hurrying along the most recent great extinction!

I wonder if anything we built will last for the next sentient species that arises.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›