this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

World News

47658 readers
2435 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 5 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I wrote this on a lead-up article. Being against the use of landmines up until the point of "Well, it's different now because we need them" is hypocritical.

[–] mgnome@piefed.social 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That may be hypocritical, but having hostile neighbour, that itself doesn't respect any conventions (and Russians absolutely don't mind anti-personnel landmines among other things such as cluster munitions and chemical warfare) is a good stimuli to rethink ones principles.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 1 points 1 day ago
[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The world changed. Changing your opinion when the situation changes is smart, not hypocritical

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Yes, changing your opinion when there are new facts is smart.

The problem is that what changed was "Other nations are under threat of invasion and might benefit from landmines" to "Now we are also under threat." So, that's hypocritical. Landmines were always good for defense from invasion, so perhaps they should have been banned under more strict circumstances.

If you're only changing your position because now it affects you personally and not out of general principles, that's hypocrisy.

[–] count_dongulus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

This shows that the way to get rid of landmines is not to have countries sign a piece of paper. It's to give them a better alternative, whether it's literally peace, or another dirt-cheap area denial defensive weapon that isn't indiscriminate. Because the paper is worthless once real stakes are on the line.

I think autonomous drones will eventually supplant landmines. Whether that's better or worse, I don't know.

[–] Lembot_0003@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago

More mines near Russians, hurray!

[–] lnxtx 0 points 1 day ago