this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2025
594 points (98.5% liked)

News

30307 readers
3100 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

During a Tuesday hearing at the 9th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals, the DOJ urged a three-judge panel to issue an emergency stay of a lower court order and allow the Trump administration’s deployment of the California National Guard to continue in Los Angeles — going so far as to argue a president’s federalization of militia can’t be second-guessed by the courts, even if the chief executive mobilized forces from all 50 states and Washington, D.C., simultaneously.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 81 points 1 day ago

Tastes like fascism.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 129 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This is dictatorship. It's mild only because no one is fighting back. The moment someone tries the gloves will come off.

[–] jabjoe@feddit.uk 20 points 1 day ago

That is how they want everyone to feel so there isn't much fight back. However, I think if there was, and the gloves came off, it may also split Republicans and even Trumpers.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 106 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Telling the court that the court has no say. Bold move Cotton….

[–] bizzle@lemmy.world 41 points 1 day ago

I mean hes done it before with no consequences so we'll see

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So much to unpack there...

So the bestest president evah now caused a rebellion? Did that ever happen before to any president? Oh yeah, under trump 1 there was January the 6th, instigated and orchestrated by king Cheeto

And now there is another rebellion?

I mean, it's demonstrations but seeing that distinction is hard for smooth brain idiots

Then telling judges that they can't say no because else they can't stop a rebellion? I mean, you STARTED it, if you want to stop it's really easy: STOP BREAKING THE LAW!

And stop telling judges they can't do their job

[–] Dragomus@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

The keyword is rebellion...

But it is not really about current protests ... it is to have all lights on green when there actually IS a rebellion cooking so the response can be swift and far beyond proportions.

[–] Luouth@lemmy.world 73 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"BECAUSE WE SAID SO!! OKAY?!"

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 47 points 1 day ago

"Because once we have that power, we'll use it on you if you speak out."

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

That's what authoritarianism is (leaving off the "OKAY?!").

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 day ago

yea, that's how fascism works. "judges" are there to protect the state from the people, not the other way around

[–] albert180@piefed.social 38 points 1 day ago

Sounds like Dictatorship to me

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Rebellion is the American way, fight back

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 30 points 1 day ago

That's some incredibly intense kneeling they're doing right there. Who knew the DOJ was so good at kissing the floor?

[–] Bieren@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Whelp. Trump now has the means to get his 3rd term.

[–] card797@champserver.net 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

You are funny. He'll be dead before even giving the thought that he is running.

Welcome to fascism.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And Harvey Weinstein's lawyers say he's totally innocent too...

trumps been using the DOJ as his own lawyers, they're always gonna say he can do whatever he wants. Literally, they said nothing about this can be weighed on by any court:

“Our view is that this statute commits the decision whether to call up the forces to the president’s unreviewable discretion,” Shumate answered. “So no, there’s no role for the court to play in reviewing that decision.”

It two trump judges and one from Biden. And while the trump judges clearly disagree, they're gonna kick it to the SC.

Which is what was always going to happen here. Newsom isn't dumb enough to think a lawsuit would fix anything, he's just grandstanding because he wants to run for president.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 day ago

It two trump judges and one from Biden. And while the trump judges clearly disagree, they're gonna kick it to the SC.

SCOTUS is an appeals court, they rule on lower court findings.

A lower court can't "kick it to the SC". They have to make a ruling.

[–] crawancon@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

when there is no justice there is.....

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›