this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2025
94 points (95.2% liked)

Global News

4237 readers
999 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) where title is not clear enough from which country the news is coming from.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Exclusive: Just 46 per cent of young men support abortion in all or most cases, almost half as many as older generations

Archived version: https://archive.is/20250615194152/https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/abortion-rights-uk-legal-men-poll-b2770356.html


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 7 hours ago

Choose wisely my daughter's

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 4 points 7 hours ago

These numbers are so sad. Based on the numbers their fathers probably supported it. I wonder if this a repercussions of more progressive men not breeding as much and raising sons not to be douches.

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I will never understand why the left engages people with this rhetoric. NO ONE wants to have an abortion. We are not fighting for your right to abort.

This is about your right to privacy, your right to receive adequate medical care, as well as proper sexual education regarding contraception.

Liberal areas with proper sex ed classes and adequate access to medical care for women have drastically lower abortion rates than conservative areas.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago

Had a girl at the bar ask me my opinion on abortion. (This was in the 90s for reference. I'd have a different answer now.)

"It's none of my business to have an opinion. I'm a man."

"Right fucking answer!"

And fuck we did!

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 hours ago
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

That's because they've been mindfucked by red-pilled social media since they were in the womb.

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Well, good thing they won't be the ones getting the abortions. Imagine if someone tried to tell them what they could and couldn't do with their bodies, that would be so crazy.

[–] Jimmycakes@lemmy.world 10 points 12 hours ago

Tell those young men to not get any abortions

[–] warm@kbin.earth 17 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

1000 people is such an irrelevant data set.

16-34 is such a massive age range, a 34 year old is completely different to a 16 year old.

Where was the poll even posted? Media like this is what's causing our problems. It's just cherry picking for headlines.

[–] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io -2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A sample size of 1000 people gives a margin of error of only 3%..

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

For random bias yes. Unfortunately, that age group are notoriously difficult to poll accurately. Without knowing how the polling was done, detecting systematic bias is difficult.

E.g. street polling on a Sunday morning, near a church, or mosque will get vastly different results to the same poll near the high street, on a Friday night.

Also relevant. https://xkcd.com/882/

Don't get me wrong, it's a worrying poll. Buta lot of studies like this disappear back into the noise, when studied by multiple groups.

[–] Bad_Engineering@fedia.io 1 points 9 hours ago

The study says they used online polling but didn't elaborate further so who's to say what biases there may or may not be. But generally ipsos does a pretty good job with their polling.

I do agree that most of these polls tend to end up being nothing burgers, but there has been a recent trend of younger males gravitating towords the right of the political spectrum. I mainly commented to point out that a sample size of 1000 is generally recognized to be large enough for accuracy.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 10 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Warren Farrell has been warning the world for 20 years that neglecting and marginalising young men is going to result in generations of angry men who have checked out of society and will turn to criminality. By every available metric from suicide to educational outcomes, boys and young men are suffering enormously. Drowning people do terrible things. Lashing out at society in the ballot box is going to be the least of our issues soon.

Despite this, I predict society will continue to blame them for their failures, marginalise them, mock them, and pretend that they're privileged. This is going to get worse until people are ready to have a serious society-wide discussion about how we can help young men succeed in the modern world.

[–] zedcell@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Waaaahwaahwaah

Fucking get a grip, women have had to deal with way more shit historically and contemporarilly and haven't become shit heel fascists and bigots. This is male supremacists upset at their power slipping away from them, and yearning to take a firm hand of the whip.

Women get raped and harassed, men get the weepies for not being able to fuck or get a job, turning them into fascist little hitlerites. Get a fucking grip.

[–] NeonNight@lemm.ee 8 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I think it’s funny how if you ignore the needs and wants of young men, you get an increase in angry criminals that drag society down. But if you ignore the needs and wants of young women, you get business as usual. Thats why so many men resist women speaking up. They think it takes their voice away; they don’t want to be treated like women, so they rebel. We need a new status quo that treats us as equals. Don’t shame young men, but people need to be teaching them to be better too.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works 2 points 13 hours ago

I don't think framing their issues in terms of women's issues is helpful. "But what about men" is just a unhelpful when dealing with issues for women. Feminism did great things to advance the interests of women, and it required coordination and struggle over many decades against a system which wasn't receptive to their needs. Now, each year, the U.S. spends close to $8B on women's initiatives spanning many areas from healthcare to education. If you're suggesting men need their own movement, perhaps you're right. Perhaps what we're seeing is the early formation of that. Messy, uncoordinated, and immature, as are all early movements.

In the mean time, I don't think "be better" is a resonant message. It was rightly dismissed when people said it to women in the 1960s and it should be dismissed now. These issues are structural and require structural solutions. I think a big part of this is economic. Men are taught from a young age (by men and women) that unless they make a lot of money, they're worthless. Society is offering fewer and fewer opportunities for men in traditionally blue collar industries to thrive. If we offer few opportunities and call them worthless for not succeeding, this is a recipe for societal instability.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Like this isn't by design?? Young men are swinging so hard because they are most eagerly vulnerable to manipulation. It isn't happening by accident, a quirk of circumstances or unintentional neglect.

[–] JasSmith@sh.itjust.works -1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I don't think young men are genetically predisposed to this. They are the product of the society in which they grow up. They're seeking help because no one else is there to help.

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

You don't think young men are genetically predisposed to seeking violent solutions and promoting violent rhetoric, more so than young women are? Because I think they very obviously are. I don't think that's remotely disputable. And I think that's being intentionally exploited.

There are LOTS of people "there to help". But you don't find them on 4chan, X, or Truth.social.

[–] pepperjohnson@lemm.ee 5 points 13 hours ago

Fuck these other men.

[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I'm so disturbed by how fashy gen z became

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 4 points 15 hours ago

Don't ignore the gender bias

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 61 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

This growing forced birth movement among young men is so fucking terrifying. I mean it's an entire generation of men who believe women should be chattel.

[–] NeonNight@lemm.ee 6 points 13 hours ago

The algorithms are all pointing them towards manosphere content that says shit like “your body, my choice”. Everything is a joke or entertainment now so you can have insane political beliefs “for the lols” that end up becoming their real opinions, and if you try to challenge them “you’re taking it too seriously/it’s just a joke/it’s not that deep”

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 21 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

incelism is a growing threat for the last 10 years, made worst by people peterson, rogan, shapiro and many grifters.

[–] P1nkman@lemmy.world 10 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

My (ex) best friend from childhood is now 39, single, has a kid, and is an incel who blames all his problems on women. And I mean literally: he can't keep a job because of women. He even lost his truck driver gig because of women! Not that he ever explained it, just complained that everything was caused by women.

We don't talk anymore.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Omg the number of guys like this who claim to have been set back or hurt somehow by positive discrimination (which they call “forced diversity”), but can’t conjure up a single concrete example when challenged and just segue into the next rant…

[–] Balaquina@lemmy.ca 32 points 23 hours ago (4 children)

Yeah, until their girlfriend gets pregnant.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 3 points 7 hours ago

Or worst say they'll help and then ditch after born.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 19 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, but that's reality. Reality doesn't factor into manosphere posturing.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I bet they are those type of men who run faster than roger rabbit at the first signs…

[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 3 points 15 hours ago

faster than roger rabbit

?

[–] thegr8goldfish@startrek.website 25 points 23 hours ago

You should have them really show their commitment by having them sign up for foster kids at the same time as registering this hot take.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 3 points 16 hours ago

Until it’s going to be theirs, naturally.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 2 points 17 hours ago

Fucking sickness. If they had to carry and birth, never would be a question or issue.