this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
710 points (99.3% liked)

memes

15323 readers
4740 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Underwaterbob@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 hours ago

Yeah, "spin" was a stupid thing to call it. We have a nice, hard definition of what "spin" is on a macro scale. Why take a complex property of matter that we don't have a name for, and give it the same name as a fairly common, easy-to-understand phenomenon? Extraordinarily smart people being idiots, honestly.

[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Imagine a woman in hot pants with thighs like a Robert Crumb dream woman.

I don't know if it helps with this problem though.

[–] P00ptart@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

NoU Imagine a cactus eating a deer.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

imagines a static cube

Ahhh....

[–] mechoman444@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Well... Technically they oscillate at a certain frequency.

[–] capuccino@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago (1 children)
[–] LiamMayfair@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

electrons be vibin

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 51 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I recall a Richard Feynman video where the interviewer asks him to explain how magnets work.

His answer amounts to "I can't explain that to you because if I gave you an accurate answer it would be too technical for it to make sense to you, and if I simplified it to the extent that you could understand, it would no longer be a meaningful answer."

[–] slackassassin@sh.itjust.works 11 points 21 hours ago

His point was that we don't understand the interaction between fundamental forces enough to say, if we were to try and answer the question accurately enough.

So, in one sense ICP was right that we don't know how magnets work. But also they were wrong that scientists be lying. They shouldn't have been pissed.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

All of the most-impactful minds in science were mocked by their contemporaries.

Think about it.

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Uuuh I have to remember that one

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (6 children)

That interview answer always seemed like a cop-out to me. You could make a comparison to gravity to explain how magnetism "just is".

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

A lot of Feynman quotes are ultimately just witty cop-outs IMO.

[–] porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I guess they are, there's for sure something to that, but at the same time these quantum or relativistic phenomena really can't be described accurately in simple words

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 7 hours ago

It's certainly unintuitive, but that makes sense; our intuition is formed from our experiences, and we have no experience with the domains that relativity and Quantum mechanics apply to.

[–] dgdft@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I expect Feynman’s answer, if he had a whiteboard and unlimited time, would’ve been to dive into Maxwell’s equations.

With that in mind, his answer makes complete sense. Good luck explaining coupled PDEs to people who aren’t mathy in a few sentences without visual aid. The analogy to the gravitational force isn’t on point; there’s a lot more to be said about how magnets tie to into E&M more broadly, compared to gravity.

Though you’re absolutely right that once you get deep enough into any topic in physics that the answer to “why?” inevitably becomes “it just be like that”.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

The analogy to the gravitational force isn’t on point; there’s a lot more to be said about how magnets tie to into E&M more broadly, compared to gravity.

Yeah, a proper answer would need to dive into how it relates to electricity for sure

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

I think OP's meme illustrates Feynman's point very well; there comes a stage where if the number of incorrect statements in your explanation outnumber the the correct ones, it's no longer a meaningful explanation.

[–] GraniteM@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Here's the video.

It's been a while since I watched it, so judge for yourself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 23 points 1 day ago
[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 123 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (26 children)

Whenever any of this comes up I remember that physics professor's speech on first day of quantum mechanics that got viral:

“Nobody understands quantum mechanics. The people who came up with it don't understand it. I will do my best so that by the end of this course you don't understand it either, and so you can got out to the world and spread our ignorance.”

Or something to that effect.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The Many Worlds Interpretation must be rejected because it makes sense and we've already agreed that Quantum Mechanics is not supposed to make sense.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Well put. I will never understand how Bohr managed to persuade so many scientists to commit themselves to not making sense.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I think the trick was to establish that disagreeing with the Copenhagen Interpretation makes you one of these idiots who can't comprehend Quantum Mechanics. Idiots like... Albert Einstein? Or... Erwin Schrödinger? You know, real morons.

load more comments (25 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›