this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
367 points (96.9% liked)

memes

14820 readers
4317 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] woodenleg_duck@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

There is also the comic version from Alarmingly Bad.

[–] anonymouse2@sh.itjust.works 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Odds don't mean shit when you win the die in a fireball lottery. Odds are zero if you don't play.

[–] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 4 hours ago

Says the one who hasn't yet had an aeroplane crash into their house

[–] fmtx@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 2 hours ago

The way that airline safety is positioned has always annoyed me. Back in the day they used to say, "Your odds of dying in a car crash are greater than dying in a plane crash." That statement never sat right with me because while the aggregate number of casualties is greater for car crashes than airline crashes, it doesn't address the survivability for the passengers of a single incident.

I forget the statistics, but depending on the type of car crash, passenger seat position mattered in a car, with higher mortality rates for the driver's side vs passenger side, and higher mortality for front seat vs back seat.

Now what about a single airplane crash? It doesn't matter if you are seated in first class, business class, economy, the flight deck, or in the cargo hold. Survivability rates for the entire plane are low for the entire plane in the event of a crash.

Yes, planes have less incidents compared to cars, but if a plane has a problem, it's going to be a big problem for everyone on board.

/rant

[–] PotatoesFall@discuss.tchncs.de 36 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

wouldn't that achieve the opposite?

[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 9 hours ago

No. We can change it to waaaaay way way lower chances.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago

The handguns are free with purchase of a flight ticket

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 2 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

Would there be more or less mass shootings if literally every adult had a gun

[–] ililiililiililiilili@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

There would be more homicides in general and waaaaay more suicide.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Most people would probably do more harm than good trying to stop a mass shooting with their own gun.

Right. People with a gun in the house are more likely to be injured or killed by a gun, not less.

[–] Nasan@sopuli.xyz 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

More until we reach convergence or critical mass and become singularity shooting.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

Yeehar bullets all the way down

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 12 points 9 hours ago

FAA funding cuts: hold my beer. 🍺

[–] missandry351@lemmings.world -1 points 6 hours ago

In USA this is not much comfort, shootings every hour and shit